Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 353 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| AAP | $3.6B | 81.6× | 16.9× | 0.4× | -5.4% | 43.4% | 0.5% | 2.0% | 0.8% | 14.9× | 353 |
Peers = companies sharing AAP's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $3.1B covers the $0 due within a year 3123000000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-01-03 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $3.1B fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $59.55 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 23.5%/yr for a decade (off $61M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares · net debt $289M
mean -32.7% · volatility σ 103% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 23.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (103%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $60M dividends + $0 buybacks = $60M returned on -$298M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.60B 100.0% | $9.09B 100.0% | $9.21B 100.0% | $9.15B 100.0% | $11.00B 100.0% | $10.11B 100.0% | $9.71B 100.0% | $9.58B 100.0% | $9.37B 100.0% | $9.57B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.87B 56.6% | $5.68B 62.5% | $5.35B 58.1% | $4.92B 53.7% | $6.07B 55.2% | $5.62B 55.7% | $5.45B 56.2% | $5.36B 56.0% | $5.29B 56.4% | $5.31B 55.5% |
| Gross Profit | $3.73B 43.4% | $3.41B 37.5% | $3.86B 41.9% | $4.23B 46.3% | $4.92B 44.8% | $4.48B 44.3% | $4.25B 43.8% | $4.22B 44.0% | $4.09B 43.6% | $4.26B 44.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $3.57B 41.5% | $3.81B 41.9% | $3.81B 41.3% | $3.71B 40.5% | $4.10B 37.3% | $3.73B 36.9% | $3.58B 36.8% | $3.62B 37.7% | $3.51B 37.5% | $3.47B 36.3% |
| Operating Income | -$43.0M -0.5% | -$713.0M -7.8% | $39.0M 0.4% | $524.6M 5.7% | $822.4M 7.5% | $749.9M 7.4% | $677.2M 7.0% | $604.3M 6.3% | $570.2M 6.1% | $787.6M 8.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$48.0M -0.6% | -$55.0M -0.6% | -$86.0M -0.9% | -$64.4M -0.7% | -$39.9M -0.4% | -$98.9M -1.0% | -$39.4M -0.4% | -$49.0M -0.5% | -$50.0M -0.5% | -$48.8M -0.5% |
| Pretax Income | -$91.0M -1.1% | -$768.0M -8.4% | -$47.0M -0.5% | $460.2M 5.0% | $782.5M 7.1% | $651.0M 6.4% | $637.7M 6.6% | $555.3M 5.8% | $520.3M 5.6% | $738.8M 7.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$159.0M -1.8% | -$181.0M -2.0% | -$17.0M -0.2% | $99.7M 1.1% | $185.9M 1.7% | $158.0M 1.6% | $150.8M 1.6% | $131.4M 1.4% | $44.8M 0.5% | $279.2M 2.9% |
| Net Income | $44.0M 0.5% | -$336.0M -3.7% | $30.0M 0.3% | $464.4M 5.1% | $596.6M 5.4% | $493.0M 4.9% | $486.9M 5.0% | $423.8M 4.4% | $475.5M 5.1% | $459.6M 4.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.73 | $-5.63 | $0.50 | $7.70 | $9.32 | $7.17 | $6.87 | $5.75 | $6.44 | $6.22 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.73 | $-5.61 | $0.50 | $7.65 | $9.25 | $7.14 | $6.84 | $5.73 | $6.42 | $6.20 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 59.9M | 59.6M | 59.4M | 60.4M | 64.0M | 68.7M | 70.9M | 73.7M | 73.8M | 73.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 60.6M | 59.9M | 59.6M | 60.7M | 64.5M | 69.0M | 71.2M | 74.0M | 74.1M | 73.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 17.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.0 | 56.2 | 55.7 | 55.2 | 53.7 | 58.1 | 62.5 | 56.6 |
| Gross Profit | 44.0 | 43.8 | 44.3 | 44.8 | 46.3 | 41.9 | 37.5 | 43.4 |
| SG&A | 37.7 | 36.8 | 36.9 | 37.3 | 40.5 | 41.3 | 41.9 | 41.5 |
| Operating Income | 6.3 | 7.0 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 5.7 | 0.4 | -7.8 | -0.5 |
| Income Tax | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 | -0.2 | -2.0 | -1.8 |
| Net Income | 4.4 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 0.3 | -3.7 | 0.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AAP: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.