Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 12 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$5M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -195%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $124K 100.0% | $21K 100.0% | $122K 100.0% | $3.5M 100.0% | $595K 100.0% | $17K 100.0% | $12K 100.0% | $78K 100.0% | $251K 100.0% | — |
| Cost of Revenue | $21K 17.1% | $53K 253.7% | $376K 307.8% | $2.1M 60.1% | $184K 31.0% | $11K 68.1% | $9K 74.8% | $65K 83.5% | $60K 24.0% | — |
| Gross Profit | $103K 82.9% | -$32K -153.7% | -$254K -207.8% | $1.4M 39.9% | $410K 69.0% | $5K 31.9% | $3K 25.2% | $13K 16.5% | $191K 76.0% | — |
| Research & Development | $7.7M 6241.9% | $8.4M 40590.1% | $7.3M 5992.4% | $6.8M 194.5% | $1.9M 323.0% | $389 2.3% | $53K 447.6% | $33K 41.9% | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.3M 5109.3% | $5.4M 26028.3% | $5.6M 4614.8% | $8.5M 242.5% | $2.4M 396.5% | $1.4M 8726.3% | $1.5M 13049.7% | $1.3M 1691.8% | $770K 307.0% | $667K |
| Total Operating Expenses | $14.1M 11351.2% | $13.8M 66618.4% | $13.0M 10607.2% | $15.4M 437.0% | $4.3M 719.5% | $1.4M 8728.6% | $1.6M 13497.3% | $1.3M 1733.7% | $770K 307.0% | — |
| Operating Income | -$14.0M -11268.3% | -$13.8M -66772.2% | -$13.2M -10815.0% | -$14.0M -397.1% | -$3.9M -650.5% | -$1.4M -8696.7% | -$1.6M -13472.1% | -$1.3M -1717.2% | -$580K -231.0% | -$667K |
| Interest Expense | $712K 573.4% | $616K 2973.9% | $144K 118.1% | $54K 1.5% | $19K 3.1% | $11K 64.6% | — | $4K 5.1% | $38K 15.0% | $3K |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$780K -628.1% | -$1.0M -4926.2% | -$563K -461.3% | -$30K -0.9% | -$21K -3.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$14.8M -11896.4% | -$14.9M -71698.4% | -$13.8M -11276.3% | -$14.0M -398.0% | -$21K -3.6% | -$10K -61.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | $800 0.6% | $800 3.9% | $800 0.7% | $0 0.0% | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | — | $0 |
| Net Income | -$14.8M -11897.0% | -$14.9M -71702.3% | -$13.8M -11277.0% | -$14.0M -398.0% | -$3.9M -654.0% | -$1.5M -8758.2% | -$1.6M -13479.7% | -$1.3M -1722.3% | -$617K -246.0% | -$670K |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-3.46 | $-7.82 | $-3.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-3.46 | $-7.82 | $-3.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 4.3M | 1.9M | 4.1M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 4.3M | 1.9M | 4.1M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 83.5 | 74.8 | 68.1 | 31.0 | 60.1 | 307.8 | 253.7 | 17.1 |
| Gross Profit | 16.5 | 25.2 | 31.9 | 69.0 | 39.9 | -207.8 | -153.7 | 82.9 |
| R&D | 41.9 | 447.6 | 2.3 | 323.0 | 194.5 | 5992.4 | 40590.1 | 6241.9 |
| SG&A | 1691.8 | 13049.7 | 8726.3 | 396.5 | 242.5 | 4614.8 | 26028.3 | 5109.3 |
| Operating Income | -1717.2 | -13472.1 | -8696.7 | -650.5 | -397.1 | -10815.0 | -66772.2 | -11268.3 |
| Income Tax | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0.0 | 0.7 | 3.9 | 0.6 |
| Net Income | -1722.3 | -13479.7 | -8758.2 | -654.0 | -398.0 | -11277.0 | -71702.3 | -11897.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AIMD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.