Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 4 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 37%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 4 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-03 · 17d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.2M 100.0% | $32.1M 100.0% | $53.5M 100.0% | $64.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $5.7M 37.2% | $10.6M 33.0% | $12.0M 22.4% | $13.5M 21.0% |
| Gross Profit | $9.6M 62.8% | $21.5M 67.0% | $41.5M 77.6% | $50.7M 79.0% |
| Research & Development | $7.6M 49.7% | $17.4M 54.1% | $27.7M 51.8% | $17.0M 26.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $21.4M 140.2% | $28.4M 88.4% | $46.0M 86.1% | $15.4M 23.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $39.7M 260.9% | $71.7M 223.3% | $120.6M 225.5% | $82.7M 128.9% |
| Operating Income | -$30.2M -198.0% | -$50.2M -156.3% | -$79.1M -147.9% | -$32.0M -49.9% |
| Interest Expense | $0 0.0% | $2.3M 7.1% | $10.6M 19.8% | $4.4M 6.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.5M 9.7% | $43.7M 136.2% | -$3.5M -6.5% | -$5.6M -8.7% |
| Pretax Income | -$28.7M -188.3% | -$6.5M -20.2% | -$82.6M -154.4% | -$37.6M -58.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $74K 0.5% | $718K 2.2% | $264K 0.5% | $143K 0.2% |
| Net Income | -$28.8M -188.8% | -$7.2M -22.4% | -$82.8M -154.9% | -$37.7M -58.8% |
| Per Share | ||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-3.81 | $-3.20 | $-59.38 | $-37.75 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-3.81 | $-3.20 | $-59.38 | $-37.75 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 7.5M | 2.2M | 1.4M | 1.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 7.5M | 2.2M | 1.4M | 1.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~6.3% on $36M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-03
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 21.0 | 22.4 | 33.0 | 37.2 |
| Gross Profit | 79.0 | 77.6 | 67.0 | 62.8 |
| R&D | 26.4 | 51.8 | 54.1 | 49.7 |
| SG&A | 23.9 | 86.1 | 88.4 | 140.2 |
| Operating Income | -49.9 | -147.9 | -156.3 | -198.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | -58.8 | -154.9 | -22.4 | -188.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ALURW: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 3 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.