Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.01% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 2 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| AMBO | $115M | 85.2× | 843.1× | 12.1× | 0.8% | 54.8% | 14.4% | 16.5% | 11.9% | 23.0× | 2 |
Peers = companies sharing AMBO's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.01 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 44.5%/yr for a decade (off $435000 normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares · net debt $2M
mean -90.3% · volatility σ 164% · implied rate exceeded in 0/2 yrs
Central path = implied 44.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (164%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$463000 FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 12%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~3.2% on $3M of debt.
Cash of $831000 fully covers short-term debt of $500000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M 100.0% | $9.4M 100.0% | $9.2M 100.0% | $14.8M 100.0% | $17.8M 100.0% | $120.2M 100.0% | $583.9M 100.0% | $531.5M 100.0% | $443.9M 100.0% | $412.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.3M 45.2% | $4.4M 46.9% | $6.7M 72.8% | $14.6M 98.1% | $15.4M 86.4% | $105.5M 87.8% | $388.9M 66.6% | $338.1M 63.6% | $256.4M 57.8% | $238.7M 57.9% |
| Gross Profit | $5.2M 54.8% | $5.0M 53.1% | $2.5M 27.2% | $284K 1.9% | $2.4M 13.6% | $14.7M 12.2% | $195.0M 33.4% | $193.4M 36.4% | $187.5M 42.2% | $173.3M 42.1% |
| Research & Development | $628K 6.6% | $438K 4.7% | $484K 5.3% | — | $2.3M 12.8% | $5.7M 4.7% | $3.8M 0.6% | $1.5M 0.3% | $6.3M 1.4% | $7.6M 1.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $3.4M 35.5% | $4.3M 45.3% | $5.3M 57.4% | $7.6M 51.4% | $7.9M 44.5% | $40.6M 33.7% | $194.4M 33.3% | $132.7M 25.0% | $142.3M 32.0% | $145.5M 35.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $5.1M 53.6% | $5.7M 60.8% | $6.8M 74.2% | $9.8M 65.8% | $11.1M 62.1% | $65.9M 54.8% | $292.7M 50.1% | $178.0M 33.5% | $185.2M 41.7% | $217.3M 52.7% |
| Operating Income | $112K 1.2% | -$722K -7.7% | -$4.3M -47.0% | -$9.5M -63.9% | -$8.6M -48.5% | -$51.2M -42.6% | -$97.7M -16.7% | $15.4M 2.9% | $2.3M 0.5% | -$44.0M -10.7% |
| Interest Expense | -$103K -1.1% | $63K 0.7% | $57K 0.6% | $101K 0.7% | — | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.3M 13.2% | $192K 2.0% | $1.1M 12.5% | $236K 1.6% | $1.4M 8.1% | $39.9M 33.2% | $10.2M 1.7% | $33.1M 6.2% | $53.2M 12.0% | $12.9M 3.1% |
| Pretax Income | $1.4M 14.4% | -$530K -5.6% | -$3.2M -34.5% | -$9.3M -62.3% | -$7.2M -40.4% | -$11.3M -9.4% | -$87.5M -15.0% | $48.4M 9.1% | $55.5M 12.5% | -$31.1M -7.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $6K 0.1% | -$839K -8.9% | $14K 0.2% | — | -$505K -2.8% | -$3.6M -3.0% | $12.9M 2.2% | $3.5M 0.7% | $9.6M 2.2% | $5.9M 1.4% |
| Net Income | $1.4M 14.4% | $309K 3.3% | -$3.2M -34.7% | -$14.3M -96.4% | $470K 2.6% | -$62.7M -52.2% | -$99.9M -17.1% | $45.0M 8.5% | $46.5M 10.5% | -$35.7M -8.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.02 | $0.01 | $-0.06 | $-0.19 | $-0.14 | $-1.41 | $-2.30 | $1.09 | $1.20 | $-0.93 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.02 | $0.01 | $-0.06 | $-0.19 | $-0.14 | $-1.41 | $-2.30 | $1.08 | $1.18 | $-0.93 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 57.1M | 57.1M | 56.3M | 49.5M | 46.7M | 44.4M | 43.5M | 41.3M | 38.8M | 38.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 57.6M | 57.1M | 56.3M | 49.5M | 46.7M | 44.4M | 43.5M | 41.7M | 39.3M | 38.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 52th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 63.6 | 66.6 | 87.8 | 86.4 | 98.1 | 72.8 | 46.9 | 45.2 |
| Gross Profit | 36.4 | 33.4 | 12.2 | 13.6 | 1.9 | 27.2 | 53.1 | 54.8 |
| R&D | 0.3 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 12.8 | — | 5.3 | 4.7 | 6.6 |
| SG&A | 25.0 | 33.3 | 33.7 | 44.5 | 51.4 | 57.4 | 45.3 | 35.5 |
| Operating Income | 2.9 | -16.7 | -42.6 | -48.5 | -63.9 | -47.0 | -7.7 | 1.2 |
| Income Tax | 0.7 | 2.2 | -3.0 | -2.8 | — | 0.2 | -8.9 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | 8.5 | -17.1 | -52.2 | 2.6 | -96.4 | -34.7 | 3.3 | 14.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AMBO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.