Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 3,059 of 5,944 reporting institutions (100th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
Peers = companies sharing AMD's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $5.5B covers all $2.5B of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2022-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.1% on $3.2B of debt.
Cash of $5.5B fully covers short-term debt of $874M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $482.05 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 42.1%/yr for a decade (off $3.4B normalized FCF).
The market's 42.1% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 1.63B shares · net debt -$2.3B
mean -271.7% · volatility σ 1045% · implied rate exceeded in 4/7 yrs
Central path = implied 42.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (1045%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1.3B buybacks = $1.3B returned on $6.7B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.64B 100.0% | $25.79B 100.0% | $22.68B 100.0% | $23.60B 100.0% | $16.43B 100.0% | $9.76B 100.0% | $6.73B 100.0% | $6.47B 100.0% | $5.25B 100.0% | $4.32B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $17.49B 50.5% | $13.06B 50.6% | $12.22B 53.9% | $13.00B 55.1% | $8.51B 51.8% | $5.42B 55.5% | $3.86B 57.4% | $4.03B 62.2% | $3.47B 66.0% | $3.32B 76.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3.51B 66.7% | $3.27B 75.8% |
| Gross Profit | $17.15B 49.5% | $12.72B 49.4% | $10.46B 46.1% | $10.60B 44.9% | $7.93B 48.2% | $4.35B 44.5% | $2.87B 42.6% | $2.45B 37.8% | $1.79B 34.0% | $1.00B 23.2% |
| Research & Development | $8.09B 23.4% | $6.46B 25.0% | $5.87B 25.9% | $5.00B 21.2% | $2.85B 17.3% | $1.98B 20.3% | $1.55B 23.0% | $1.43B 22.1% | $1.20B 22.8% | $1.01B 23.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $4.14B 12.0% | $2.73B 10.6% | $2.32B 10.2% | $2.34B 9.9% | $1.45B 8.8% | $995.0M 10.2% | $750.0M 11.1% | $562.0M 8.7% | $516.0M 9.8% | $466.0M 10.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $13.46B 38.9% | $10.82B 42.0% | $10.06B 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | $3.69B 10.7% | $1.90B 7.4% | $401.0M 1.8% | $1.26B 5.4% | $3.65B 22.2% | $1.37B 14.0% | $631.0M 9.4% | $451.0M 7.0% | $127.0M 2.4% | -$373.0M -8.6% |
| Interest Expense | $131.0M 0.4% | $92.0M 0.4% | $106.0M 0.5% | $88.0M 0.4% | $34.0M 0.2% | $47.0M 0.5% | $94.0M 1.4% | $121.0M 1.9% | $126.0M 2.4% | $156.0M 3.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $577.0M 1.7% | $181.0M 0.7% | $197.0M 0.9% | $8.0M 0.0% | $55.0M 0.3% | -$47.0M -0.5% | -$165.0M -2.5% | $0 0.0% | -$9.0M -0.2% | $80.0M 1.9% |
| Pretax Income | $4.17B 12.0% | $2.02B 7.8% | $508.0M 2.2% | $1.20B 5.1% | $3.67B 22.4% | $1.28B 13.1% | $372.0M 5.5% | $328.0M 5.1% | -$15.0M -0.3% | -$459.0M -10.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$103.0M -0.3% | $381.0M 1.5% | -$346.0M -1.5% | -$122.0M -0.5% | $513.0M 3.1% | -$1.21B -12.4% | $31.0M 0.5% | -$9.0M -0.1% | $18.0M 0.3% | $39.0M 0.9% |
| Net Income | $4.33B 12.5% | $1.64B 6.4% | $854.0M 3.8% | $1.32B 5.6% | $3.16B 19.2% | $2.49B 25.5% | $341.0M 5.1% | $337.0M 5.2% | -$33.0M -0.6% | -$498.0M -11.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.67 | $1.01 | $0.53 | $0.85 | $2.61 | $2.10 | $0.31 | $0.34 | $-0.03 | $-0.60 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.65 | $1.00 | $0.53 | $0.84 | $2.57 | $2.06 | $0.30 | $0.32 | $-0.03 | $-0.60 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 1.62B | 1.62B | 1.61B | 1.56B | 1.21B | 1.18B | 1.09B | 982.0M | 952.0M | 835.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 1.64B | 1.64B | 1.63B | 1.57B | 1.23B | 1.21B | 1.12B | 1.06B | 952.0M | 835.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 62.2 | 57.4 | 55.5 | 51.8 | 55.1 | 53.9 | 50.6 | 50.5 |
| Gross Profit | 37.8 | 42.6 | 44.5 | 48.2 | 44.9 | 46.1 | 49.4 | 49.5 |
| R&D | 22.1 | 23.0 | 20.3 | 17.3 | 21.2 | 25.9 | 25.0 | 23.4 |
| SG&A | 8.7 | 11.1 | 10.2 | 8.8 | 9.9 | 10.2 | 10.6 | 12.0 |
| Operating Income | 7.0 | 9.4 | 14.0 | 22.2 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 7.4 | 10.7 |
| Income Tax | -0.1 | 0.5 | -12.4 | 3.1 | -0.5 | -1.5 | 1.5 | -0.3 |
| Net Income | 5.2 | 5.1 | 25.5 | 19.2 | 5.6 | 3.8 | 6.4 | 12.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AMD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.