Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q2 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 33 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-06-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXP | $208.1B | 20.0× | — | 5.0× | 6.4% | — | 26.2% | 32.4% | 11.9% | — | 2,932 |
| COIN | $47.3B | 40.3× | 26.1× | 6.6× | 9.4% | — | 17.6% | 8.5% | 5.9% | -3.0× | 1,102 |
| BMNP | $23.1B | 7.4× | 50.8× | — | 84.1% | 5.1% | — | 4.0% | 4.0% | -1.1× | — |
| SOFI | $20.4B | 40.5× | — | 33.0× | 23.1% | 1.7% | 77.7% | 4.6% | 3.9% | — | 916 |
| CHYM | $11.4B | — | — | 5.2× | 30.7% | 88.0% | -46.2% | -72.1% | -72.1% | — | 272 |
| HUT | $10.4B | — | — | 44.2× | 44.8% | 54.2% | -96.2% | -15.9% | -15.9% | — | 417 |
| WULF | $6.9B | — | — | 40.8× | 20.3% | 39.2% | -393% | -471% | -20.4% | — | 493 |
| CIFR | $5.6B | — | — | 25.1× | 48.0% | 63.7% | -367% | -102% | -23.1% | — | 462 |
| DAVE | $4.7B | 27.2× | 23.8× | 8.5× | 59.7% | — | 35.3% | 55.5% | 55.5% | -0.4× | 336 |
| GPGI | $3.7B | — | — | 61.1× | -85.8% | 48.1% | -227% | -55.9% | -55.9% | — | 192 |
| CLSK | $2.7B | — | 4.9× | 3.5× | 102% | 55.2% | 47.6% | 16.8% | 12.9% | 0.9× | 411 |
| UPST | $2.3B | 53.6× | 52.2× | 2.3× | 64.0% | — | 5.1% | 6.7% | 2.0% | 17.4× | 366 |
| KEEL | $1.9B | — | — | 8.2× | 72.0% | -8.2% | -124% | -50.8% | -23.1% | — | — |
| WLTH | $1.7B | — | — | 4.6× | 18.2% | 89.6% | -11.5% | -6.8% | -6.8% | — | 137 |
| PGY | $1.5B | 19.6× | 4.4× | 1.2× | 26.1% | 42.4% | 6.3% | 17.0% | 17.0% | -0.8× | — |
| PWP | $1.2B | 33.3× | 15.6× | 1.6× | -14.5% | — | 4.7% | -27.9% | -27.9% | -4.2× | 161 |
| WD | $1.1B | 20.1× | — | 0.9× | 9.0% | — | 4.6% | 3.2% | 3.2% | — | 259 |
| RHLD | $924M | — | 6.2× | 2.0× | 9.9% | 56.3% | -1.3% | -91.1% | -3.1% | 0.1× | 120 |
| BUR | $786M | 12.8× | — | 1.9× | -24.3% | — | 15.1% | 2.6% | 1.4% | — | 237 |
| QFIN | $754M | 2.0× | 0.1× | 0.3× | 16.8% | 84.4% | 31.1% | 24.8% | 24.8% | -0.7× | 156 |
| WYFI | $610M | — | — | 7.7× | 66.2% | 60.2% | -31.2% | -5.1% | -4.9% | — | 127 |
| ABTC | $563M | — | — | 3.0× | 159% | 50.3% | -82.7% | -23.0% | -23.0% | — | 126 |
| FWDI | $560M | — | — | 30.8× | -9.0% | 28.5% | -918% | -11.4% | -11.4% | — | 3 |
| HKD | $544M | 3.9× | 71.5× | 4.0× | 566% | — | 71.3% | 36.8% | 18.5% | — | 17 |
| OPRT | $410M | 16.8× | — | 0.4× | -4.5% | — | 2.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | — | 132 |
| ATCH | $27M | — | — | 2.5× | — | — | 53.0% | -84.6% | 62.0% | — | 29 |
Peers = companies sharing ATCH's sector (Finance Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~50.3% on $16.1M of debt.
Cash of $7.5M fully covers short-term debt of $4.5M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $822K FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-12
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -85% against ROIC 62% — -147% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Income | — | — | -45.3 |
| Income Tax | — | — | -2.4 |
| Net Income | — | — | 53.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ATCH: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive EBIT.
Free cash flow has fallen short of reported profit in 3 of the last three years.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $6M | $6M |
| Share-based comp | $83,745 | $6M |
| Other non-cash & working capital | −$5M | $822,027 |
| Operating cash flow | $822,027 | $822,027 |
| Capex | $0 | $822,027 |
| Free cash flow | $822,027 | $822,027 |
| FCF after SBC | $738,282 | $738,282 |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2022 | 5.9 percent |
| FY2023 | 4.7 percent |
| FY2025 | 8.1 percent |
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.
Reported free cash flow is $822,027; after share-based compensation it is $738,282. The difference is a real cost that the cash flow statement adds back.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a bank.
Balance sheet at 2025-06-30. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
At $0.17, free cash flow must compound 18.11%/yr for 10 years. It has no positive compounding record to compare against.
The cost of capital could not be computed for this company, so the requirement is solved at the published 10% default — a different rate would move it materially.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 29 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-10-12
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.9M 100.0% | — | — |
| Total Operating Expenses | $15.8M 145.3% | $2.7M | $3.0M |
| Operating Income | -$4.9M -45.3% | -$2.7M | -$3.0M |
| Interest Expense | $8.1M 74.4% | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.0M 18.4% | $3.1M | $3.1M |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $10.4M 95.9% | $4.3M | $14.6M |
| Pretax Income | $5.5M 50.6% | $1.5M | $11.6M |
| Income Tax Expense | -$259K -2.4% | $726K | $537K |
| Net Income | $5.8M 53.0% | $795K | $11.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.