Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 526 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.22B 100.0% | $11.98B 100.0% | $10.66B 100.0% | $9.26B 100.0% | $8.36B 100.0% | $7.86B 100.0% | $7.46B 100.0% | $6.70B 100.0% | $6.17B 100.0% | $5.81B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $5.30B 47.3% | $5.42B 45.2% | $4.92B 46.2% | $4.30B 46.5% | $3.90B 46.6% | $3.66B 46.5% | $3.38B 45.3% | $3.10B 46.2% | $2.87B 46.5% | $2.68B 46.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.27B 11.3% | $1.25B 10.4% | $1.28B 12.0% | $1.53B 16.6% | $1.16B 13.9% | $1.04B 13.2% | $1.04B 13.9% | $927.9M 13.8% | $855.5M 13.9% | $814.1M 14.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $10.18B 90.8% | $10.61B 88.6% | $9.65B 90.5% | $8.81B 95.2% | $7.68B 91.8% | $7.10B 90.4% | $6.79B 91.0% | $6.10B 91.0% | $5.65B 91.6% | $5.30B 91.3% |
| Operating Income | $1.03B 9.2% | $1.37B 11.4% | $1.01B 9.5% | $447.0M 4.8% | $685.2M 8.2% | $754.4M 9.6% | $669.2M 9.0% | $602.4M 9.0% | $519.7M 8.4% | $506.0M 8.7% |
| Interest Expense | $212.0M 1.9% | $186.0M 1.6% | $172.9M 1.6% | $119.8M 1.3% | $92.4M 1.1% | $81.3M 1.0% | $97.0M 1.3% | $89.5M 1.3% | $82.3M 1.3% | $62.3M 1.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $13.0M 0.1% | $17.0M 0.1% | -$13.0M -0.1% | $31.0M 0.3% | $11.2M 0.1% | -$10.7M -0.1% | $7.2M 0.1% | $2.5M 0.0% | -$7.4M -0.1% | -$18.1M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $862.0M 7.7% | $1.22B 10.2% | $854.0M 8.0% | $368.0M 4.0% | $604.0M 7.2% | $662.4M 8.4% | $579.4M 7.8% | $515.4M 7.7% | $430.0M 7.0% | $425.7M 7.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $11.0M 0.1% | $284.0M 2.4% | $248.0M 2.3% | $97.0M 1.0% | $137.5M 1.6% | $53.5M 0.7% | $96.8M 1.3% | $96.9M 1.4% | $128.3M 2.1% | $164.8M 2.8% |
| Net Income | $850.5M 7.6% | $935.0M 7.8% | $605.7M 5.7% | $271.2M 2.9% | $466.6M 5.6% | $609.0M 7.7% | $482.6M 6.5% | $418.5M 6.2% | $301.7M 4.9% | $260.8M 4.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.92 | $7.28 | $4.61 | $2.04 | $3.46 | $4.40 | $3.43 | $2.94 | $2.05 | $1.74 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.90 | $7.25 | $4.59 | $2.03 | $3.44 | $4.37 | $3.41 | $2.91 | $2.03 | $1.72 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 122.1M | 127.8M | 130.4M | 132.2M | 134.1M | 137.7M | 140.1M | 141.9M | 146.0M | 148.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 122.4M | 128.3M | 130.8M | 132.7M | 134.9M | 138.7M | 141.2M | 143.2M | 147.8M | 150.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $71.90 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 4.3%/yr for a decade (off $759M normalized FCF).
The market's 4.3% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.12B shares · net debt $3.2B
mean 45.1% · volatility σ 151% · implied rate exceeded in 1/5 yrs
Central path = implied 4.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (151%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 27% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $276M dividends + $598M buybacks = $874M returned on $1.0B FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 16%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 17%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $728M covers the $78M due within a year 9.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2021-03-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~5.4% on $3.9B of debt.
Cash of $728M fully covers short-term debt of $19M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 633 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $33.13T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $405.3B | 46.3× | 32.2× | 6.0× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $399.8B | 46.8× | — | 8.7× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $298.4B | 44.8× | 21.3× | 3.4× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| ABBNY | $187.8B | 50.7× | 33.5× | 5.8× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $175.3B | 24.7× | 16.7× | 7.2× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $173.5B | 42.8× | — | 6.3× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| DE | $165.5B | 33.1× | — | 3.6× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| HON | $157.6B | 33.7× | 18.9× | 4.2× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| HTHIF | $153.6B | 0.7× | — | 0.0× | 3.9% | 25.2% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 7.4% | — | 2 |
| LMT | $132.3B | 26.9× | 17.0× | 1.8× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 18.4% | 2.4× | 2,807 |
| PH | $127.9B | 36.8× | 28.7× | 6.4× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| HWM | $117.0B | 78.5× | 51.2× | 14.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 18.4% | 1.2× | 1,399 |
| ADP | $109.5B | 27.1× | — | 5.3× | 7.1% | 46.0% | 19.8% | 65.9% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $107.8B | 37.3× | 26.5× | 5.1× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $106.3B | 81.5× | 50.3× | 10.4× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.5% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| GD | $103.9B | 24.9× | 18.1× | 2.0× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| PWR | $102.2B | 100.4× | 50.3× | 3.6× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 0.0× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $100.1B | 30.6× | — | 4.2× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| MMM | $96.6B | 30.4× | 18.4× | 3.9× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $95.1B | 33.2× | 15.3× | 6.8× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| EMR | $91.4B | 40.2× | — | 5.1× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $91.4B | 16.4× | 10.1× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| WM | $90.4B | 33.5× | 12.7× | 3.6× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| CMI | $89.7B | 31.7× | 16.9× | 2.7× | -1.3% | 25.3% | 8.8% | 23.9% | 23.9% | — | 1,877 |
| BAH | $8.7B | 10.4× | 9.9× | 0.8× | -6.4% | 52.7% | 7.6% | 77.0% | 16.9% | 3.3× | 526 |
Peers = companies sharing BAH's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 15-yr range · 26th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 15-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 46.2 | 45.3 | 46.5 | 46.6 | 46.5 | 46.2 | 45.2 | 47.3 |
| SG&A | 13.8 | 13.9 | 13.2 | 13.9 | 16.6 | 12.0 | 10.4 | 11.3 |
| Operating Income | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.6 | 8.2 | 4.8 | 9.5 | 11.4 | 9.2 |
| Income Tax | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | 6.2 | 6.5 | 7.7 | 5.6 | 2.9 | 5.7 | 7.8 | 7.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BAH: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.