Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $15.74 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -0.9%/yr for a decade (off $574M normalized FCF).
The market's -0.9% is more conservative than its 7-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.41B shares (market data) · net debt -$364M
mean 905.9% · volatility σ 3767% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied -0.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (3767%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.34B 100.0% | $26.83B 100.0% | $22.53B 100.0% | $21.90B 100.0% | $19.38B 100.0% | $12.00B 100.0% | $6.78B 100.0% | $4.13B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.75B 63.4% | $18.06B 67.3% | $17.09B 75.8% | $18.05B 82.4% | $15.34B 79.1% | $9.16B 76.3% | $5.59B 82.4% | $3.27B 79.3% |
| Gross Profit | $1.59B 36.6% | $8.77B 32.7% | $5.44B 24.2% | $3.85B 17.6% | $4.04B 20.9% | $2.84B 23.7% | $1.19B 17.6% | $855.4M 20.7% |
| Research & Development | $505.3M 11.6% | $3.69B 13.7% | $4.47B 19.8% | $4.77B 21.8% | $2.84B 14.7% | $1.51B 12.6% | $894.4M 13.2% | $537.5M 13.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $294.9M 6.8% | $2.03B 7.6% | $2.12B 9.4% | $2.52B 11.5% | $1.84B 9.5% | $976.1M 8.1% | $592.5M 8.7% | $461.2M 11.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.43B 32.9% | $10.12B 37.7% | $10.51B 46.6% | $12.21B 55.7% | $10.47B 54.0% | $5.98B 49.8% | $2.69B 39.6% | $1.58B 38.4% |
| Operating Income | $160.8M 3.7% | -$1.34B -5.0% | -$5.06B -22.5% | -$8.36B -38.2% | -$6.43B -33.2% | -$3.14B -26.2% | -$1.50B -22.1% | -$729.0M -17.7% |
| Interest Expense | $21.5M 0.5% | $89.2M 0.3% | $164.9M 0.7% | $250.9M 1.1% | $155.5M 0.8% | $108.5M 0.9% | $46.5M 0.7% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $12.0M 0.3% | -$56.2M -0.2% | $331.2M 1.5% | $954.4M 4.4% | -$284.4M -1.5% | $140.3M 1.2% | $227.5M 3.4% | $189.9M 4.6% |
| Pretax Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -$78.4M -1.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.5M 0.1% | -$36.5M -0.1% | $78.7M 0.3% | $104.1M 0.5% | $95.3M 0.5% | $53.4M 0.4% | $35.9M 0.5% | $26.0M 0.6% |
| Net Income | $170.7M 3.9% | -$1.35B -5.0% | -$4.82B -21.4% | -$7.51B -34.3% | -$6.81B -35.1% | -$3.05B -25.5% | -$1.30B -19.2% | -$565.0M -13.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.41 | $-3.23 | $-11.67 | $-18.99 | $-17.87 | $-8.71 | $-3.99 | $-2.64 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.39 | $-3.23 | $-11.67 | $-18.99 | $-17.87 | $-8.71 | $-3.99 | $-2.64 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 323.2M | 233.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 323.2M | 233.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $118M buybacks = $118M returned on $949M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~1.6% on $1.4B of debt.
Cash of $1.7B fully covers short-term debt of $695M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 79.3 | 82.4 | 76.3 | 79.1 | 82.4 | 75.8 | 67.3 | 63.4 |
| Gross Profit | 20.7 | 17.6 | 23.7 | 20.9 | 17.6 | 24.2 | 32.7 | 36.6 |
| R&D | 13.0 | 13.2 | 12.6 | 14.7 | 21.8 | 19.8 | 13.7 | 11.6 |
| SG&A | 11.2 | 8.7 | 8.1 | 9.5 | 11.5 | 9.4 | 7.6 | 6.8 |
| Operating Income | -17.7 | -22.1 | -26.2 | -33.2 | -38.2 | -22.5 | -5.0 | 3.7 |
| Income Tax | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -13.7 | -19.2 | -25.5 | -35.1 | -34.3 | -21.4 | -5.0 | 3.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BILI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.84T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.13T | 43.0× | 38.5× | 23.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.92T | 44.6× | 34.4× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.75T | 28.2× | 19.9× | 11.3× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.63T | 72.3× | 64.6× | 25.6× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 121.7× | 57.4× | 27.7× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $804.3B | 186.2× | 190.3× | 23.2× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $485.4B | — | 60.6× | 9.2× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $435.8B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $414.4B | 275.1× | 286.8× | 92.6× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $348.4B | 61.5× | 33.0× | 3.1× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $347.0B | 65.9× | 55.4× | 18.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $336.4B | 49.0× | 38.7× | 11.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $316.6B | — | — | 1023.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $275.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $268.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $254.3B | 281.2× | 218.9× | 51.7× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $249.8B | 233.7× | 156.0× | 27.1× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| CRM | $241.0B | 33.3× | 26.0× | 5.8× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| TXN | $239.4B | 48.3× | 31.5× | 13.5× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $236.0B | 68.3× | 59.6× | 26.2× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| IBM | $233.4B | 22.3× | — | 3.5× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $226.6B | — | — | 30.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $193.5B | 36.0× | 14.5× | 4.4× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $185.4B | 71.3× | 121.2× | 22.6× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| BILI | $6.5B | 40.4× | 26.6× | 1.5× | 18.1% | 36.6% | 3.9% | 7.7% | 4.7% | 6.0× | 154 |
Peers = companies sharing BILI's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position