Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -8.97% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.5B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $544.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.1B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $200.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $165.9B | 20.9× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $126.2B | 31.3× | 10.8× | 0.9× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $124.6B | 53.3× | 23.6× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $116.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| EQNR | $110.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| PSX | $107.4B | 24.5× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| WMB | $86.6B | 33.1× | 17.6× | 7.2× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $83.3B | — | 12.5× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $78.7B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $78.2B | 22.3× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.7B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $68.4B | 22.4× | 14.0× | 4.0× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.1B | 33.5× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| LNG | $58.8B | 11.1× | 7.7× | 2.9× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| MPLX | $58.7B | — | — | 4.5× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.9× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| OKE | $58.4B | 17.1× | 12.4× | 1.7× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| BKR | $55.9B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $55.4B | 34.0× | 11.1× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| BOOM | $124M | — | 4.2× | 0.2× | -5.1% | 22.2% | -2.2% | -5.6% | -4.6% | 1.5× | 119 |
Peers = companies sharing BOOM's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $6.24 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -17.1%/yr for a decade (off $39M normalized FCF).
The market's -17.1% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $19M
mean -502.7% · volatility σ 1199% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied -17.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (1199%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-16
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $609.8M 100.0% | $642.9M 100.0% | $719.2M 100.0% | $654.1M 100.0% | $260.1M 100.0% | $229.2M 100.0% | $397.6M 100.0% | $326.4M 100.0% | $192.8M 100.0% | $158.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $474.6M 77.8% | $492.3M 76.6% | $507.1M 70.5% | $468.6M 71.6% | $200.6M 77.1% | $172.3M 75.2% | $252.6M 63.5% | $215.7M 66.1% | $133.4M 69.2% | $119.9M 75.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $133.4M 69.2% | $119.9M 75.6% |
| Gross Profit | $135.3M 22.2% | $150.6M 23.4% | $212.1M 29.5% | $185.4M 28.4% | $59.5M 22.9% | $56.9M 24.8% | $144.9M 36.5% | $110.7M 33.9% | $59.4M 30.8% | $38.7M 24.4% |
| Research & Development | $5.0M 0.8% | $5.8M 0.9% | $6.9M 1.0% | $6.8M 1.0% | $7.2M 2.8% | $7.9M 3.5% | $8.4M 2.1% | $7.2M 2.2% | $5.2M 2.7% | $4.6M 2.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $61.3M 10.0% | $61.4M 9.6% | $75.3M 10.5% | $76.1M 11.6% | $36.3M 13.9% | $29.1M 12.7% | $38.0M 9.6% | $38.5M 11.8% | $27.1M 14.1% | $22.1M 13.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $135.4M 22.2% | $281.8M 43.8% | $150.9M 21.0% | $155.5M 23.8% | $61.9M 23.8% | $57.8M 25.2% | $86.5M 21.8% | $73.3M 22.4% | $71.7M 37.2% | $44.0M 27.7% |
| Operating Income | -$110K -0.0% | -$131.3M -20.4% | $61.2M 8.5% | $30.0M 4.6% | -$2.4M -0.9% | -$996K -0.4% | $58.4M 14.7% | $37.4M 11.5% | -$12.3M -6.4% | -$5.3M -3.3% |
| Interest Expense | $6.5M 1.1% | $8.7M 1.3% | $9.5M 1.3% | $6.2M 0.9% | $304K 0.1% | $731K 0.3% | $1.6M 0.4% | $1.6M 0.5% | $1.6M 0.9% | $1.1M 0.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5K 0.0% | $3K 0.0% | $3K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.1M -0.2% | -$1.1M -0.2% | -$1.8M -0.2% | -$594K -0.1% | $152K 0.1% | -$233K -0.1% | -$169K -0.0% | -$1.2M -0.4% | -$1.4M -0.7% | $633K 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | -$7.7M -1.3% | -$141.0M -21.9% | $49.9M 6.9% | $23.2M 3.5% | -$2.6M -1.0% | -$2.0M -0.9% | $56.7M 14.3% | $34.6M 10.6% | -$15.3M -7.9% | -$5.7M -3.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.1M 0.7% | $11.0M 1.7% | $15.1M 2.1% | $9.4M 1.4% | -$1.5M -0.6% | -$548K -0.2% | $22.7M 5.7% | $4.1M 1.3% | $3.6M 1.9% | $797K 0.5% |
| Net Income | -$13.5M -2.2% | -$94.5M -14.7% | $26.3M 3.7% | $12.2M 1.9% | -$202K -0.1% | -$1.4M -0.6% | $34.0M 8.6% | $30.5M 9.3% | -$18.9M -9.8% | -$6.5M -4.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.90 | $-8.20 | $1.08 | $0.72 | $-0.26 | $-0.10 | $2.29 | $2.05 | $-1.31 | $-0.46 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.90 | $-8.20 | $1.08 | $0.72 | $-0.26 | $-0.10 | $2.28 | $2.04 | $-1.31 | $-0.46 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 19.9M | 19.7M | 19.5M | 19.4M | 17.6M | 14.8M | 14.6M | 14.5M | 14.3M | 14.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 19.9M | 19.7M | 19.5M | 19.4M | 17.6M | 14.8M | 14.7M | 14.6M | 14.3M | 14.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1M buybacks = $1M returned on $37M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~12.8% on $51M of debt.
Cash of $32M fully covers short-term debt of $3M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-16
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 19.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 66.1 | 63.5 | 75.2 | 77.1 | 71.6 | 70.5 | 76.6 | 77.8 |
| Gross Profit | 33.9 | 36.5 | 24.8 | 22.9 | 28.4 | 29.5 | 23.4 | 22.2 |
| R&D | 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| SG&A | 11.8 | 9.6 | 12.7 | 13.9 | 11.6 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Operating Income | 11.5 | 14.7 | -0.4 | -0.9 | 4.6 | 8.5 | -20.4 | -0.0 |
| Income Tax | 1.3 | 5.7 | -0.2 | -0.6 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| Net Income | 9.3 | 8.6 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 1.9 | 3.7 | -14.7 | -2.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BOOM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.