Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 355 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $9.20 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -2.1%/yr for a decade (off $223M normalized FCF).
The market's -2.1% is more conservative than its 7-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt $1.0B
mean 150.0% · volatility σ 387% · implied rate exceeded in 4/7 yrs
Central path = implied -2.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (387%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.32B 100.0% | $2.00B 100.0% | $1.67B 100.0% | $1.37B 100.0% | $1.25B 100.0% | $988.3M 100.0% | $854.4M 100.0% | $827.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.55B 66.7% | $1.29B 64.6% | $1.14B 68.2% | $949.7M 69.2% | $860.9M 69.0% | $650.3M 65.8% | $542.6M 63.5% | $549.8M 66.4% |
| Gross Profit | $770.4M 33.3% | $707.3M 35.4% | $530.2M 31.8% | $421.8M 30.8% | $386.2M 31.0% | $338.0M 34.2% | $311.8M 36.5% | $277.7M 33.6% |
| Research & Development | $16.0M 0.7% | $14.3M 0.7% | $12.0M 0.7% | $11.4M 0.8% | $11.2M 0.9% | $9.4M 1.0% | $7.6M 0.9% | $8.1M 1.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $396.0M 17.1% | $284.6M 14.3% | $216.3M 13.0% | $189.7M 13.8% | $167.1M 13.4% | $151.8M 15.4% | $127.1M 14.9% | $135.1M 16.3% |
| Operating Income | $357.4M 15.4% | $387.7M 19.4% | $287.3M 17.2% | $212.4M 15.5% | $168.0M 13.5% | $164.0M 16.6% | $162.5M 19.0% | $119.8M 14.5% |
| Interest Expense | $68.4M 3.0% | $58.3M 2.9% | $66.9M 4.0% | $49.2M 3.6% | $43.2M 3.5% | $54.7M 5.5% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $289.0M 12.5% | $329.4M 16.5% | $220.4M 13.2% | $145.6M 10.6% | $123.2M 9.9% | $109.3M 11.1% | $162.5M 19.0% | $119.8M 14.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $72.8M 3.1% | $82.9M 4.2% | $54.9M 3.3% | $29.6M 2.2% | $8.8M 0.7% | $9.2M 0.9% | $39.4M 4.6% | $23.7M 2.9% |
| Net Income | $216.2M 9.3% | $246.5M 12.3% | $165.5M 9.9% | $82.3M 6.0% | $27.6M 2.2% | $23.5M 2.4% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.70 | $1.89 | $1.24 | $0.88 | $0.70 | $0.60 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.68 | $1.86 | $1.23 | $0.88 | $0.70 | $0.60 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 126.9M | 130.3M | 133.0M | 93.5M | 39.5M | 39.4M | 0 | 0 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 128.5M | 132.3M | 134.1M | 93.8M | 39.7M | 39.5M | 0 | 0 |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $256M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 34%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $72M covers all $25M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2023-09-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~6.3% on $1.1B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 66.4 | 63.5 | 65.8 | 69.0 | 69.2 | 68.2 | 64.6 | 66.7 |
| Gross Profit | 33.6 | 36.5 | 34.2 | 31.0 | 30.8 | 31.8 | 35.4 | 33.3 |
| R&D | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| SG&A | 16.3 | 14.9 | 15.4 | 13.4 | 13.8 | 13.0 | 14.3 | 17.1 |
| Operating Income | 14.5 | 19.0 | 16.6 | 13.5 | 15.5 | 17.2 | 19.4 | 15.4 |
| Income Tax | 2.9 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 3.1 |
| Net Income | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 6.0 | 9.9 | 12.3 | 9.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BRBR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $870.8B | 40.0× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $407.3B | 50.5× | 31.1× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $384.5B | 29.4× | 25.3× | 8.0× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $343.4B | 22.4× | 16.2× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $303.2B | 26.8× | 17.7× | 7.5× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $186.6B | 22.7× | 15.2× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $118.2B | 17.1× | 13.7× | 5.1× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.7B | 33.0× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $71.9B | 19.5× | 10.4× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.4B | 33.4× | 19.6× | 3.5× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.2B | — | 16.2× | 5.2× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.9B | 20.6× | 14.4× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $41.8B | 38.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $41.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $41.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| SYY | $40.8B | 22.4× | 10.2× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KR | $39.7B | 39.5× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| EL | $35.4B | — | 803.9× | 2.5× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| HSY | $35.2B | — | 20.6× | 3.0× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| KVUE | $34.3B | 23.6× | 11.7× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| KMB | $32.9B | 16.3× | 10.4× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.1B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $28.4B | 18.9× | 8.4× | 0.7× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| DLTR | $23.7B | 19.2× | 11.0× | 1.2× | 10.4% | 36.3% | 6.6% | 34.2% | 20.7% | 1.1× | 819 |
| KOF | $23.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| BRBR | $1.2B | 5.5× | 5.8× | 0.5× | 16.1% | 33.3% | 9.3% | -47.6% | 34.3% | 2.9× | 355 |
Peers = companies sharing BRBR's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.