Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +0.80% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| BSET | $170M | 28.0× | 7.7× | 0.5× | 1.6% | 56.3% | 1.8% | 3.7% | 3.7% | — | 79 |
Peers = companies sharing BSET's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $19.62 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 10.9%/yr for a decade (off $5M normalized FCF).
The market's 10.9% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$41M
mean -201.1% · volatility σ 274% · implied rate exceeded in 1/6 yrs
Central path = implied 10.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (274%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 77% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $7M dividends + $2M buybacks = $9M returned on $9M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · 3%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $41M covers all $2M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2014-11-29 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.3M 100.0% | $329.9M 100.0% | $390.1M 100.0% | $485.6M 100.0% | $430.9M 100.0% | $337.7M 100.0% | $452.1M 100.0% | $456.9M 100.0% | $452.5M 100.0% | $432.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $146.6M 43.7% | $150.5M 45.6% | $183.6M 47.1% | $237.3M 48.9% | $209.8M 48.7% | $163.6M 48.4% | $179.2M 39.6% | $179.6M 39.3% | $177.6M 39.2% | $167.5M 38.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $177.6M 39.2% | $167.5M 38.8% |
| Gross Profit | $188.7M 56.3% | $179.4M 54.4% | $206.5M 52.9% | $248.3M 51.1% | $221.1M 51.3% | $174.1M 51.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $180.4M 53.8% | $187.5M 56.8% | $205.2M 52.6% | $218.1M 44.9% | $196.8M 45.7% | $176.4M 52.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | $7.8M 2.3% | -$16.3M -4.9% | -$3.1M -0.8% | $34.9M 7.2% | $24.3M 5.6% | -$17.5M -5.2% | -$595K -0.1% | $14.1M 3.1% | $27.0M 6.0% | $28.2M 6.5% |
| Interest Expense | $52K 0.0% | $30K 0.0% | $22K 0.0% | $38K 0.0% | $33K 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $6K 0.0% | $57K 0.0% | $234K 0.1% | $552K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.0M 0.6% | $2.7M 0.8% | $2.5M 0.6% | $302K 0.1% | $48K 0.0% | $232K 0.1% | $568K 0.1% | $431K 0.1% | $230K 0.1% | $120K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$994K -0.3% | -$744K -0.2% | -$1.9M -0.5% | -$1.1M -0.2% | -$1.5M -0.4% | -$740K -0.2% | -$1.7M -0.4% | -$2.3M -0.5% | -$2.3M -0.5% | -$2.0M -0.5% |
| Pretax Income | $8.8M 2.6% | -$14.4M -4.4% | -$2.5M -0.6% | $34.1M 7.0% | $22.8M 5.3% | -$18.0M -5.3% | -$1.7M -0.4% | $12.2M 2.7% | $27.9M 6.2% | $25.8M 6.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.7M 0.8% | -$4.7M -1.4% | $683K 0.2% | $8.7M 1.8% | $5.8M 1.4% | -$6.5M -1.9% | $188K 0.0% | $4.0M 0.9% | $9.6M 2.1% | $9.9M 2.3% |
| Net Income | $6.1M 1.8% | -$9.7M -2.9% | -$3.2M -0.8% | $65.3M 13.5% | $18.0M 4.2% | -$10.4M -3.1% | -$1.9M -0.4% | $8.2M 1.8% | $18.3M 4.0% | $15.8M 3.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.70 | $-1.11 | $-0.36 | $6.96 | $1.83 | $-1.04 | $-0.19 | $0.77 | $1.71 | $1.47 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.70 | $-1.11 | $-0.36 | $6.95 | $1.83 | $-1.04 | $-0.19 | $0.77 | $1.70 | $1.46 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | — | — | — | 9.4M | 9.8M | 10.0M | 10.3M | 10.7M | 10.6M | 10.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | — | — | 9.4M | 9.8M | 10.0M | 10.3M | 10.7M | 10.7M | 10.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 39.3 | 39.6 | 48.4 | 48.7 | 48.9 | 47.1 | 45.6 | 43.7 |
| Gross Profit | — | — | 51.6 | 51.3 | 51.1 | 52.9 | 54.4 | 56.3 |
| SG&A | — | — | 52.2 | 45.7 | 44.9 | 52.6 | 56.8 | 53.8 |
| Operating Income | 3.1 | -0.1 | -5.2 | 5.6 | 7.2 | -0.8 | -4.9 | 2.3 |
| Income Tax | 0.9 | 0.0 | -1.9 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.2 | -1.4 | 0.8 |
| Net Income | 1.8 | -0.4 | -3.1 | 4.2 | 13.5 | -0.8 | -2.9 | 1.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BSET: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.