Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.19% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~3.7% on $173M of debt.
Cash of $130M is below short-term debt of $173M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.42B 100.0% | $1.29B 100.0% | $8.81B 100.0% | $8.40B 100.0% | $9.40B 100.0% | $8.85B 100.0% | $7.28B 100.0% | $5.39B 100.0% | $4.15B 100.0% | $3.39B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $368.4M 25.9% | $2.47B 191.6% | $2.41B 27.3% | $2.26B 26.9% | $3.28B 34.9% | $3.33B 37.6% | $2.77B 38.1% | $2.03B 37.7% | $1.92B 46.2% | $1.92B 56.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $294.7M 7.1% | $1.92B 56.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $107.5M 7.6% | $719.2M 55.7% | $855.9M 9.7% | $371.5M 4.4% | $525.8M 5.6% | $224.0M 2.5% | $215.7M 3.0% | $154.8M 2.9% | $116.6M 2.8% | $88.3M 2.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.41B 99.4% | $9.54B 738.8% | $9.02B 102.3% | $8.37B 99.6% | $9.39B 99.9% | $8.29B 93.7% | $6.89B 94.7% | $732.6M 13.6% | $3.89B 93.8% | $3.30B 97.3% |
| Operating Income | $8.1M 0.6% | -$114.8M -8.9% | -$206.4M -2.3% | $33.3M 0.4% | $7.0M 0.1% | $558.7M 6.3% | $383.7M 5.3% | $355.8M 6.6% | $256.3M 6.2% | $90.1M 2.7% |
| Interest Expense | $6.4M 0.4% | $39.0M 3.0% | $5.8M 0.1% | $56.9M 0.7% | $56.8M 0.6% | $66.1M 0.7% | $61.3M 0.8% | $13.1M 0.2% | $4.3M 0.1% | $0 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $8.4M 0.6% | $68.8M 5.3% | $82.1M 0.9% | $45.8M 0.5% | $62.9M 0.7% | $41.4M 0.5% | $42.6M 0.6% | $8.0M 0.1% | $13.3M 0.3% | $11.9M 0.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$257.3M -18.1% | $21.8M 1.7% | -$10.6M -0.1% | $613.6M 7.3% | — | — | — | — | — | $12.2M 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | -$28.7M -2.0% | -$93.0M -7.2% | -$217.0M -2.5% | -$580.3M -6.9% | -$154.0M -1.6% | $548.9M 6.2% | $348.3M 4.8% | $335.7M 6.2% | $264.6M 6.4% | $102.3M 3.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $1.4M 0.1% | $20.7M 1.6% | $12.0M 0.1% | $26.5M 0.3% | $55.3M 0.6% | $127.8M 1.4% | $71.1M 1.0% | $65.0M 1.2% | $54.3M 1.3% | $16.8M 0.5% |
| Net Income | -$34.6M -2.4% | -$185.2M -14.3% | -$278.4M -3.2% | -$653.3M -7.8% | -$219.8M -2.3% | $426.0M 4.8% | $281.9M 3.9% | $269.8M 5.0% | $209.1M 5.0% | $85.4M 2.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.20 | $-1.03 | $-1.56 | $-3.56 | $-1.02 | $2.27 | $1.62 | $1.59 | $1.29 | $0.58 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.20 | $-1.03 | $-1.56 | $-3.56 | $-1.02 | $2.23 | $1.57 | $1.50 | $1.19 | $0.53 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 173.5M | 179.7M | 178.5M | 183.3M | 216.4M | 187.3M | 173.9M | 169.9M | 162.1M | 149.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 173.5M | 179.7M | 178.5M | 183.3M | 216.4M | 191.0M | 178.9M | 179.3M | 176.1M | 163.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.96 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -38.4%/yr for a decade (off $164M normalized FCF).
The market's -38.4% is more conservative than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares (market data) · net debt $43M
mean -86.7% · volatility σ 154% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied -38.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (154%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 7% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $3M dividends + $1M buybacks = $5M returned on $45M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| BZUN | $172M | — | 5.4× | 0.1× | 10.2% | 74.1% | -2.4% | -6.6% | -5.0% | 4.3× | 67 |
Peers = companies sharing BZUN's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 37.7 | 38.1 | 37.6 | 34.9 | 26.9 | 27.3 | 191.6 | 25.9 |
| SG&A | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 9.7 | 55.7 | 7.6 |
| Operating Income | 6.6 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | -2.3 | -8.9 | 0.6 |
| Income Tax | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | 5.0 | 3.9 | 4.8 | -2.3 | -7.8 | -3.2 | -14.3 | -2.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BZUN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.