Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.45% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 243 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC | $673.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 154 |
| XOM | $633.7B | 22.6× | — | 1.9× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| CVX | $344.7B | 28.1× | — | 1.8× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| RYDAF | $253.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| TTE | $187.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $144.0B | 18.1× | — | 2.4× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| STOHF | $99.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| VLO | $93.4B | 40.0× | 17.9× | 0.8× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| CNQ | $93.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 709 |
| MPC | $90.8B | 22.5× | 7.8× | 0.7× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EIPAF | $84.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| PSX | $82.2B | 18.8× | — | 0.6× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 8.9% | — | 2,041 |
| SU | $75.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 724 |
| SLB | $74.6B | 21.2× | — | 2.1× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| EOG | $72.9B | 14.7× | 7.1× | 3.2× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| BKR | $61.2B | — | — | 2.2× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 10.1% | — | 1,095 |
| IMO | $60.7B | 19.3× | — | 1.3× | -8.6% | — | 6.9% | 14.7% | 12.7% | — | 394 |
| LNG | $56.0B | 10.6× | 7.4× | 2.8× | 27.2% | — | 34.0% | 85.8% | 22.1% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| TRGP | $55.8B | 30.6× | 15.1× | 3.3× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| OKE | $54.9B | 16.1× | 11.9× | 1.6× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| FANG | $53.0B | 32.5× | 10.7× | 3.5× | 35.8% | — | 10.3% | 4.2% | 3.0% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| CVE | $52.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 437 |
| WOPEF | $42.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| CCJ | $41.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 970 |
| CAPL | $809M | 20.8× | 8.0× | 0.2× | -10.6% | 11.0% | 1.1% | — | — | 3.7× | 61 |
Peers = companies sharing CAPL's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $21.22 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 9.3%/yr for a decade (off $67M normalized FCF).
The market's 9.3% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt $690M
mean 9.5% · volatility σ 58% · implied rate exceeded in 3/9 yrs
Central path = implied 9.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (58%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.66B 100.0% | $4.10B 100.0% | $4.39B 100.0% | $4.97B 100.0% | $3.58B 100.0% | $1.93B 100.0% | $2.15B 100.0% | $2.45B 100.0% | $2.09B 100.0% | $1.87B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.26B 89.0% | $3.70B 90.3% | $4.00B 91.3% | $4.59B 92.4% | $3.30B 92.3% | $1.72B 89.0% | $1.99B 92.8% | $2.27B 92.9% | $1.93B 92.3% | $1.71B 91.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.93B 92.3% | $1.71B 91.7% |
| Gross Profit | $402.7M 11.0% | $398.3M 9.7% | $382.3M 8.7% | $375.8M 7.6% | $277.0M 7.7% | $212.1M 11.0% | $154.6M 7.2% | $172.8M 7.1% | $160.8M 7.7% | $155.6M 8.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $28.0M 0.8% | $28.8M 0.7% | $27.0M 0.6% | $25.6M 0.5% | $30.9M 0.9% | $21.0M 1.1% | $16.8M 0.8% | $18.0M 0.7% | $27.9M 1.3% | $24.2M 1.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $349.3M 9.5% | $332.7M 8.1% | $298.9M 6.8% | $280.9M 5.7% | $242.9M 6.8% | $180.7M 9.3% | $124.4M 5.8% | $146.4M 6.0% | $146.7M 7.0% | $139.6M 7.5% |
| Operating Income | $97.6M 2.7% | $70.6M 1.7% | $88.1M 2.0% | $96.0M 1.9% | $36.1M 1.0% | $115.6M 6.0% | $43.3M 2.0% | $35.0M 1.4% | $32.4M 1.5% | $32.2M 1.7% |
| Interest Expense | $48.1M 1.3% | $52.3M 1.3% | $43.7M 1.0% | $32.1M 0.6% | $18.2M 0.5% | $16.6M 0.9% | $27.0M 1.3% | $32.9M 1.3% | $27.9M 1.3% | $22.8M 1.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $577K 0.0% | $780K 0.0% | $790K 0.0% | $504K 0.0% | $544K 0.0% | $503K 0.0% | $524K 0.0% | $373K 0.0% | $439K 0.0% | $848K 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $50.1M 1.4% | $19.0M 0.5% | $45.1M 1.0% | $64.4M 1.3% | $18.4M 0.5% | $99.5M 5.1% | $16.8M 0.8% | $2.5M 0.1% | $4.9M 0.2% | $10.3M 0.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $8.3M 0.2% | -$3.4M -0.1% | $2.5M 0.1% | $714K 0.0% | -$3.2M -0.1% | -$7.9M -0.4% | -$1.2M -0.1% | -$2.7M -0.1% | -$18.2M -0.9% | -$453K -0.0% |
| Net Income | $41.8M 1.1% | $22.5M 0.5% | $42.6M 1.0% | $63.7M 1.3% | $21.7M 0.6% | $107.5M 5.6% | $18.1M 0.8% | $5.3M 0.2% | $23.2M 1.1% | $10.7M 0.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.03 | $0.52 | $1.06 | $1.63 | $0.57 | — | — | — | — | $0.22 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.02 | $0.52 | $1.05 | $1.63 | $0.57 | — | — | — | — | $0.22 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 38.1M | 38.0M | 38.0M | 37.9M | 37.9M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 38.2M | 38.2M | 38.1M | 38.1M | 37.9M | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (143%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $80M dividends + $0 buybacks = $80M returned on $56M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $3M covers the $0 due within a year 3137000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2016-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~6.9% on $693M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 63th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 92.9 | 92.8 | 89.0 | 92.3 | 92.4 | 91.3 | 90.3 | 89.0 |
| Gross Profit | 7.1 | 7.2 | 11.0 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 8.7 | 9.7 | 11.0 |
| SG&A | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Operating Income | 1.4 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.7 |
| Income Tax | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.4 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0.2 |
| Net Income | 0.2 | 0.8 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CAPL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.