Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 254 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| CENTA | $2.4B | 15.1× | 8.2× | 0.8× | -2.2% | 31.9% | 5.2% | 10.3% | 5.9% | 3.6× | 254 |
Peers = companies sharing CENTA's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $38.55 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -4.2%/yr for a decade (off $324M normalized FCF).
The market's -4.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares · net debt $309M
mean -12.5% · volatility σ 88% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied -4.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (88%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.13B 100.0% | $3.20B 100.0% | $3.31B 100.0% | $3.34B 100.0% | $3.30B 100.0% | $2.70B 100.0% | $2.38B 100.0% | $2.22B 100.0% | $2.05B 100.0% | $1.83B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.13B 68.1% | $2.26B 70.5% | $2.36B 71.4% | $2.35B 70.3% | $2.33B 70.6% | $1.90B 70.4% | $1.68B 70.5% | $1.54B 69.5% | $1.42B 69.2% | $1.28B 69.8% |
| Gross Profit | $997.3M 31.9% | $943.7M 29.5% | $946.8M 28.6% | $992.3M 29.7% | $970.9M 29.4% | $796.6M 29.6% | $704.0M 29.5% | $675.4M 30.5% | $632.8M 30.8% | $553.0M 30.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $747.3M 23.9% | $758.3M 23.7% | $736.2M 22.2% | $732.3M 21.9% | $716.4M 21.7% | $598.6M 22.2% | $552.0M 23.2% | $508.0M 22.9% | $476.7M 23.2% | $421.9M 23.1% |
| Operating Income | $250.0M 8.0% | $185.4M 5.8% | $210.6M 6.4% | $260.0M 7.8% | $254.5M 7.7% | $198.0M 7.3% | $152.1M 6.4% | $167.3M 7.6% | $156.1M 7.6% | $129.4M 7.1% |
| Interest Expense | $57.7M 1.8% | $57.5M 1.8% | $57.0M 1.7% | $58.3M 1.7% | $58.6M 1.8% | $44.0M 1.6% | $42.6M 1.8% | $39.2M 1.8% | $28.2M 1.4% | $42.8M 2.3% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $24.9M 0.8% | $19.7M 0.6% | $7.4M 0.2% | $719K 0.0% | $415K 0.0% | $4.0M 0.1% | $9.6M 0.4% | $3.1M 0.1% | $147K 0.0% | $140K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$480K -0.0% | -$5.1M -0.2% | $1.5M 0.0% | -$3.6M -0.1% | -$1.5M -0.0% | -$4.3M -0.2% | $243K 0.0% | -$3.9M -0.2% | -$1.6M -0.1% | -$17.0M -0.9% |
| Pretax Income | $216.8M 6.9% | $142.4M 4.5% | $162.4M 4.9% | $198.9M 6.0% | $194.8M 5.9% | $153.7M 5.7% | $119.3M 5.0% | $127.4M 5.8% | $126.4M 6.2% | $69.6M 3.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $52.8M 1.7% | $33.1M 1.0% | $36.3M 1.1% | $46.2M 1.4% | $42.0M 1.3% | $32.2M 1.2% | $26.6M 1.1% | $3.3M 0.1% | $46.7M 2.3% | $24.1M 1.3% |
| Net Income | $162.8M 5.2% | $108.0M 3.4% | $125.6M 3.8% | $152.2M 4.6% | $151.7M 4.6% | $120.7M 4.5% | $92.8M 3.9% | $123.6M 5.6% | $78.8M 3.8% | $44.5M 2.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.58 | $1.64 | $1.92 | $2.29 | $2.81 | $2.23 | $1.63 | $2.39 | $1.57 | $0.91 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.55 | $1.62 | $1.88 | $2.24 | $2.75 | $2.20 | $1.61 | $2.32 | $1.52 | $0.87 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 63.1M | 65.7M | 65.5M | 66.5M | 53.9M | 54.0M | 56.8M | 51.7M | 50.2M | 49.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 63.8M | 66.9M | 66.8M | 68.0M | 55.2M | 54.7M | 57.6M | 53.3M | 51.8M | 51.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $155M buybacks = $155M returned on $291M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $882M covers the $62000 due within a year 14233.7× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-09-27 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~4.8% on $1.2B of debt.
Cash of $882M fully covers short-term debt of $62000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 69.5 | 70.5 | 70.4 | 70.6 | 70.3 | 71.4 | 70.5 | 68.1 |
| Gross Profit | 30.5 | 29.5 | 29.6 | 29.4 | 29.7 | 28.6 | 29.5 | 31.9 |
| SG&A | 22.9 | 23.2 | 22.2 | 21.7 | 21.9 | 22.2 | 23.7 | 23.9 |
| Operating Income | 7.6 | 6.4 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 8.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| Net Income | 5.6 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 5.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CENTA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.