Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q2 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 82% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $18.5M dividends + $0 buybacks = $18.5M returned on $22.6M FCF.
4 consecutive years of dividend increases · 3%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 170%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-16
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 170% against ROIC 170% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 70.5 | 71.2 | 74.5 | 78.1 | 78.7 | 76.0 | 72.6 | 97.3 |
| SG&A | 9.0 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.6 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 10.1 |
| Operating Income | 29.5 | 28.8 | 26.2 | 19.7 | 21.3 | 24.0 | 27.2 | 2.7 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -8.2 | -3.5 | -10.0 | -16.3 | -9.7 | -11.3 | -4.4 | -34.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CLPR: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $30.8M is below the $153.6M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-06-30 (10-Q). The cash figure is from 2025-12-31, so the two are not the same balance-sheet date — the schedule has not been refiled since.
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-16
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $153.2M 100.0% | $148.8M 100.0% | $138.2M 100.0% | $129.7M 100.0% | $122.7M 100.0% | $122.8M 100.0% | $116.2M 100.0% | $110.0M 100.0% | $104.0M 100.0% | $93.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $149.0M 97.3% | $108.0M 72.6% | $105.0M 76.0% | $102.1M 78.7% | $95.8M 78.1% | $91.5M 74.5% | $82.7M 71.2% | $77.5M 70.5% | $74.4M 71.6% | $67.2M 72.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $15.5M 10.1% | $14.2M 9.5% | $13.2M 9.5% | $12.8M 9.8% | $10.6M 8.6% | $9.7M 7.9% | $9.2M 7.9% | $9.9M 9.0% | $9.9M 9.6% | $8.4M 9.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $149.0M 97.3% | $108.0M 72.6% | $105.0M 76.0% | $102.1M 78.7% | $95.8M 78.1% | $91.5M 74.5% | $82.7M 71.2% | $77.5M 70.5% | $74.4M 71.6% | $67.2M 72.3% |
| Operating Income | $4.2M 2.7% | $40.5M 27.2% | $33.2M 24.0% | $27.6M 21.3% | $24.2M 19.7% | $32.1M 26.2% | $33.5M 28.8% | $32.5M 29.5% | $29.5M 28.4% | $25.8M 27.7% |
| Interest Expense | $53.0M 34.6% | $47.1M 31.7% | $44.9M 32.5% | $40.2M 31.0% | $41.3M 33.6% | $40.2M 32.7% | $35.2M 30.3% | $32.8M 29.8% | $35.5M 34.2% | $38.1M 41.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — |
| Net Income | -$52.3M -34.2% | -$6.6M -4.4% | -$15.6M -11.3% | -$12.6M -9.7% | -$20.0M -16.3% | -$12.2M -10.0% | -$4.1M -3.5% | -$9.0M -8.2% | -$6.0M -5.8% | -$12.3M -13.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | -$1.38 | -$0.25 | -$0.45 | -$0.36 | -$0.51 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 16.1M | 16.1M | 16.1M | 16.1M | 16K | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 21 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-06-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSTL | $665M | 46.8× | 17.6× | 6.9× | 25.5% | — | 14.8% | 5.0% | 2.2% | 6.2× | 220 |
| CLDT | $654M | 100.4× | 9.6× | 2.2× | -7.0% | — | 5.1% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 3.1× | 176 |
| JBGS | $653M | — | 3.0× | 1.3× | -8.9% | — | -27.9% | -12.0% | -12.0% | -0.4× | 200 |
| UHT | $530M | 30.0× | 14.1× | 5.3× | 0.2% | — | 17.8% | 11.6% | 3.3% | 5.8× | 182 |
| FBRT | $516M | 9.7× | — | 1.9× | 20.9% | — | 30.5% | 5.7% | 5.7% | — | 240 |
| NXRT | $469M | — | 16.6× | 1.9× | -3.2% | — | -12.7% | -10.8% | -1.7% | 12.8× | 224 |
| BDN | $453M | — | — | 0.9× | -4.2% | 61.8% | -36.8% | -22.5% | -5.3% | — | 231 |
| FPI | $452M | 17.0× | 65.2× | 8.7× | -10.4% | — | 60.5% | 6.7% | 5.0% | 17.2× | 179 |
| TCI | $425M | 30.3× | 98.8× | 8.7× | 4.2% | — | 28.1% | 1.6% | 1.3% | — | 47 |
| FVR | $419M | — | 26.1× | 6.3× | 39.1% | — | -5.7% | -1.0% | -0.5% | 10.9× | 123 |
| LAND | $400M | — | — | 4.5× | 3.7% | 89.1% | 15.3% | 2.0% | 1.2% | — | 178 |
| CHCT | $379M | 165.5× | — | 3.1× | 4.7% | — | 4.2% | 1.2% | 0.5% | — | 169 |
| PINE | $322M | — | 19.6× | 5.3× | 15.9% | 86.0% | -4.4% | -0.9% | -0.4% | 11.7× | 144 |
| NLCP | $283M | 10.8× | 6.1× | 5.5× | 1.9% | — | 51.5% | 6.8% | 6.8% | -0.6× | 3 |
| NXDT | $260M | — | 15.4× | 3.0× | 3.3% | — | -151% | -18.6% | -18.6% | -0.5× | 124 |
| BRT | $255M | — | 16.5× | 2.6× | 1.5% | 99.8% | -12.3% | -6.7% | -6.7% | -1.8× | 112 |
| STRW | $182M | 21.4× | 7.9× | 1.2× | 32.4% | — | 4.9% | 62.6% | 0.9% | 6.3× | 77 |
| ACR | $163M | 346.7× | — | 2.0× | -4.2% | — | 35.0% | 6.6% | 1.4% | — | 67 |
| ELME | $156M | — | 1.3× | 0.7× | 6.2% | 63.3% | -5.4% | -1.2% | -1.2% | -0.1× | 157 |
| SEVN | $154M | 6.8× | — | 5.2× | -16.7% | — | 52.5% | 4.7% | 4.7% | — | 93 |
| FREVS | $139M | 39.5× | 13.3× | 4.7× | 2.2% | — | 12.0% | 10.3% | 2.3% | 5.7× | — |
| CLPR | $51M | — | 0.6× | 0.3× | 3.0% | 2.7% | -34.2% | 170% | 170% | -0.9× | 68 |
Peers = companies sharing CLPR's sector (Real Estate Investment Trusts) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2016 | 27.7% | 27.7% | -13.3% |
| FY2017 | 28.4% | 28.4% | -5.8% |
| FY2018 | 29.5% | 29.5% | -8.2% |
| FY2019 | 28.8% | 28.8% | -3.5% |
| FY2020 | 25.5% | 26.2% | -10.0% |
| FY2021 | 21.9% | 19.7% | -16.3% |
| FY2022 | 21.3% | 21.3% | -9.7% |
| FY2023 | 24.0% | 24.0% | -11.3% |
| FY2024 | 27.4% | 27.2% | -4.4% |
| FY2025 | 2.7% | 2.7% | -34.2% |
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a reit.
Ladder as of 2026-06-30 (10-Q); cash from the 2025-12-31 balance sheet; FCF from FY2025.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
At $3.19, free cash flow must compound -47.57%/yr for 10 years. It has no positive compounding record to compare against.
The cost of capital could not be computed for this company, so the requirement is solved at the published 10% default — a different rate would move it materially.