Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.02% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $0.87 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -19.0%/yr for a decade (off $8M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt $2M
mean -284.5% · volatility σ 399% · implied rate exceeded in 0/5 yrs
Central path = implied -19.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (399%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 4 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $164.5M 100.0% | $142.8M 100.0% | $150.4M 100.0% | $152.0M 100.0% | $126.1M 100.0% | $89.4M 100.0% | $64.9M 100.0% | $48.9M 100.0% | $31.4M 100.0% | $29.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $128.2M 77.9% | $109.9M 76.9% | $115.9M 77.1% | $111.0M 73.0% | $85.9M 68.1% | $58.3M 65.2% | $41.2M 63.4% | $31.3M 63.9% | $18.7M 59.5% | $17.5M 60.2% |
| Gross Profit | $36.3M 22.1% | $32.9M 23.1% | $34.5M 22.9% | $41.0M 27.0% | $40.2M 31.9% | $31.1M 34.8% | $23.8M 36.6% | $17.7M 36.1% | $12.7M 40.5% | $11.6M 39.8% |
| Research & Development | $5.8M 3.5% | $7.2M 5.0% | $8.3M 5.5% | $8.0M 5.2% | $13.3M 10.6% | $10.4M 11.7% | $8.0M 12.3% | $7.8M 16.0% | $4.2M 13.5% | $5.6M 19.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $31.9M 19.4% | $25.1M 17.6% | $21.6M 14.4% | $23.0M 15.2% | $16.8M 13.3% | $16.3M 18.3% | $17.4M 26.8% | $5.9M 12.0% | $5.6M 18.0% | $5.0M 17.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $41.7M 25.3% | $35.5M 24.8% | $34.4M 22.9% | $33.6M 22.1% | $31.8M 25.2% | $27.9M 31.2% | $26.8M 41.3% | $15.9M 32.6% | $11.1M 35.4% | $10.9M 37.7% |
| Operating Income | -$5.4M -3.3% | -$2.5M -1.8% | $76K 0.1% | $7.4M 4.9% | $8.4M 6.6% | $3.2M 3.6% | -$3.1M -4.8% | $1.7M 3.5% | $1.6M 5.1% | $614K 2.1% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $366K 0.2% | $447K 0.3% | $157K 0.1% | $91K 0.1% | $96K 0.1% | $83K 0.2% | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$5.1M -3.1% | -$1.8M -1.3% | $770K 0.5% | $7.7M 5.1% | $8.3M 6.6% | $3.7M 4.1% | -$3.1M -4.8% | $2.6M 5.3% | $2.1M 6.7% | $2.1M 7.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $948K 0.6% | $161K 0.1% | $674K 0.4% | $3.0M 2.0% | $1.3M 1.0% | $835K 0.9% | $187K 0.3% | -$112K -0.2% | -$119K -0.4% | $269K 0.9% |
| Net Income | -$7.0M -4.3% | -$2.3M -1.6% | $193K 0.1% | $4.5M 2.9% | $6.8M 5.4% | $3.1M 3.4% | -$3.4M -5.3% | $2.7M 5.5% | $2.2M 7.1% | $1.8M 6.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.26 | $-0.09 | $0.01 | $0.21 | $0.39 | $0.20 | $-0.24 | $0.21 | $0.18 | $0.16 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.26 | $-0.09 | $0.01 | $0.21 | $0.39 | $0.20 | $-0.24 | $0.21 | $0.18 | $0.16 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 27.5M | 25.2M | 23.2M | 20.9M | 17.3M | 14.7M | 13.8M | 11.5M | 11.3M | 11.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 27.5M | 25.2M | 23.2M | 21.1M | 17.6M | 14.7M | 13.8M | 11.6M | 11.3M | 11.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $4M dividends + $0 buybacks = $4M returned on -$4M FCF.
3 consecutive years of dividend increases · -13%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~3.5% on $11M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $28M is below short-term debt of $30M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 25th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 7.4× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 63.9 | 63.4 | 65.2 | 68.1 | 73.0 | 77.1 | 76.9 | 77.9 |
| Gross Profit | 36.1 | 36.6 | 34.8 | 31.9 | 27.0 | 22.9 | 23.1 | 22.1 |
| R&D | 16.0 | 12.3 | 11.7 | 10.6 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| SG&A | 12.0 | 26.8 | 18.3 | 13.3 | 15.2 | 14.4 | 17.6 | 19.4 |
| Operating Income | 3.5 | -4.8 | 3.6 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 0.1 | -1.8 | -3.3 |
| Income Tax | -0.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| Net Income | 5.5 | -5.3 | 3.4 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 0.1 | -1.6 | -4.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CLPS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| CLPS | $24M | — | — | 0.1× | 15.2% | 22.1% | -4.3% | -12.7% | -8.2% | -7.7× | 4 |
Peers = companies sharing CLPS's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.