Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 397 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 243 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC | $673.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 154 |
| XOM | $633.7B | 22.6× | — | 1.9× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| CVX | $344.7B | 28.1× | — | 1.8× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| RYDAF | $253.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| TTE | $187.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $144.0B | 18.1× | — | 2.4× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| STOHF | $99.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| VLO | $93.4B | 40.0× | 17.9× | 0.8× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| CNQ | $93.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 709 |
| MPC | $90.8B | 22.5× | 7.8× | 0.7× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EIPAF | $84.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| PSX | $82.2B | 18.8× | — | 0.6× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 8.9% | — | 2,041 |
| SU | $75.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 724 |
| SLB | $74.6B | 21.2× | — | 2.1× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| EOG | $72.9B | 14.7× | 7.1× | 3.2× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| BKR | $61.2B | — | — | 2.2× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 10.1% | — | 1,095 |
| IMO | $60.7B | 19.3× | — | 1.3× | -8.6% | — | 6.9% | 14.7% | 12.7% | — | 394 |
| LNG | $56.0B | 10.6× | 7.4× | 2.8× | 27.2% | — | 34.0% | 85.8% | 22.1% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| TRGP | $55.8B | 30.6× | 15.1× | 3.3× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| OKE | $54.9B | 16.1× | 11.9× | 1.6× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| FANG | $53.0B | 32.5× | 10.7× | 3.5× | 35.8% | — | 10.3% | 4.2% | 3.0% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| CVE | $52.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 437 |
| WOPEF | $42.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| CCJ | $41.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 970 |
| CNX | $4.9B | 8.7× | — | 2.2× | 76.8% | — | 28.3% | 14.6% | 9.7% | — | 397 |
Peers = companies sharing CNX's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.24B 100.0% | $1.27B 100.0% | $3.43B 100.0% | $1.26B 100.0% | $756.8M 100.0% | $1.26B 100.0% | $1.92B 100.0% | $1.73B 100.0% | $1.46B 100.0% | $760.0M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $37.5M 4.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.35B 60.2% | $1.26B 99.5% | $1.19B 34.7% | $1.32B 104.8% | $1.23B 163.2% | $1.70B 135.0% | $1.74B 90.3% | $1.23B 70.9% | $1.36B 93.3% | $1.17B 154.3% |
| Interest Expense | $170.6M 7.6% | $150.6M 11.9% | $143.3M 4.2% | $127.7M 10.1% | $151.2M 20.0% | $170.8M 13.6% | $151.4M 7.9% | $145.9M 8.4% | $161.4M 11.1% | $182.2M 24.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.5M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$88.0M -3.9% | -$126.8M -10.0% | -$19.9M -0.6% | -$151.5M -12.0% | -$158.4M -20.9% | -$163.1M -13.0% | -$126.3M -6.6% | $595.2M 34.4% | $20.7M 1.4% | -$172.7M -22.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $169.8M 7.6% | -$29.9M -2.4% | $502.2M 14.6% | -$69.9M -5.5% | -$137.9M -18.2% | -$174.1M -13.8% | $27.7M 1.4% | $215.6M 12.5% | -$176.5M -12.1% | -$34.4M -4.5% |
| Net Income | $633.2M 28.3% | -$90.5M -7.1% | $1.72B 50.1% | -$142.1M -11.3% | -$498.6M -65.9% | -$483.8M -38.5% | -$80.7M -4.2% | $796.5M 46.0% | $380.7M 26.2% | -$848.1M -111.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.48 | $-0.60 | $10.59 | $-0.75 | $-2.31 | $-2.43 | $-0.42 | $3.75 | $1.66 | $-3.70 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.98 | $-0.60 | $8.99 | $-0.75 | $-2.31 | $-2.43 | $-0.42 | $3.71 | $1.65 | $-3.70 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 141.5M | 151.3M | 162.5M | 189.5M | 216.0M | 199.2M | 190.7M | 212.3M | 228.8M | 229.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 160.4M | 151.3M | 192.0M | 189.5M | 216.0M | 199.2M | 190.7M | 214.6M | 231.0M | 229.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $34.54 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 9.4%/yr for a decade (off $315M normalized FCF).
The market's 9.4% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.14B shares · net debt $2.2B
mean -205.3% · volatility σ 601% · implied rate exceeded in 4/7 yrs
Central path = implied 9.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (601%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $524M buybacks = $524M returned on $534M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $779000 is below the $209M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~7.7% on $2.2B of debt.
Cash of $779000 is below short-term debt of $208M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 50th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax | 12.5 | 1.4 | -13.8 | -18.2 | -5.5 | 14.6 | -2.4 | 7.6 |
| Net Income | 46.0 | -4.2 | -38.5 | -65.9 | -11.3 | 50.1 | -7.1 | 28.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CNX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.