Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 250 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $51.06 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 21.4%/yr for a decade (off $48M normalized FCF).
The market's 21.4% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt $69M
mean 1.7% · volatility σ 98% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied 21.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (98%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.73T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.16T | 43.3× | 38.7× | 23.9× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.69T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.2× | 57.6× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $485.1B | — | 60.6× | 9.2× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $435.9B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $412.6B | 273.9× | 285.5× | 92.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $354.4B | 62.6× | 33.5× | 3.1× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $343.7B | 65.3× | 54.9× | 18.6× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $323.4B | — | — | 1045.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $271.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $265.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.6B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $239.5B | 48.3× | 31.5× | 13.5× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $237.5B | 32.8× | 25.7× | 5.7× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $232.7B | 22.2× | — | 3.5× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $223.5B | — | — | 30.4× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $201.7B | 37.5× | 15.1× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $187.8B | 72.2× | 122.8× | 22.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| COHU | $2.5B | — | — | 5.6× | 12.7% | — | -16.4% | -9.5% | -6.9% | -15.5× | 250 |
Peers = companies sharing COHU's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $9M buybacks = $9M returned on $11M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $227M covers the $11M due within a year 20.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-27 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~0.7% on $296M of debt.
Cash of $227M fully covers short-term debt of $11M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-16
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 64.7 | 60.6 | 57.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D | 12.5 | 14.8 | 13.5 | 10.4 | 11.4 | 13.9 | 21.1 | 20.4 |
| SG&A | 21.4 | 24.5 | 20.3 | 14.3 | 16.2 | 20.8 | 31.9 | 27.3 |
| Operating Income | -6.6 | -9.0 | 0.5 | 22.7 | 15.4 | 6.8 | -17.8 | -15.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | -0.5 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| Net Income | -7.1 | -11.9 | -2.2 | 18.9 | 11.9 | 4.4 | -17.4 | -16.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on COHU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-16
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $453.0M 100.0% | $401.8M 100.0% | $636.3M 100.0% | $812.8M 100.0% | $887.2M 100.0% | $636.0M 100.0% | $583.3M 100.0% | $451.8M 100.0% | $352.7M 100.0% | $282.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | $364.2M 57.3% | $353.5M 60.6% | $292.5M 64.7% | $209.3M 59.3% | $182.1M 64.6% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $140.7M 39.9% | $94.8M 33.6% |
| Research & Development | $92.2M 20.4% | $84.8M 21.1% | $88.6M 13.9% | $92.6M 11.4% | $92.0M 10.4% | $86.2M 13.5% | $86.1M 14.8% | $56.4M 12.5% | $40.7M 11.5% | $34.8M 12.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $123.6M 27.3% | $128.0M 31.9% | $132.2M 20.8% | $131.4M 16.2% | $127.0M 14.3% | $129.2M 20.3% | $142.9M 24.5% | $96.8M 21.4% | $60.7M 17.2% | $55.2M 19.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $522.7M 115.4% | $473.4M 117.8% | $593.0M 93.2% | $687.2M 84.6% | $685.7M 77.3% | $632.7M 99.5% | $635.7M 109.0% | $481.5M 106.6% | $315.0M 89.3% | $279.0M 98.9% |
| Operating Income | -$69.8M -15.4% | -$71.7M -17.8% | $43.3M 6.8% | $125.6M 15.4% | $201.5M 22.7% | $3.3M 0.5% | -$52.3M -9.0% | -$29.8M -6.6% | $37.7M 10.7% | $3.0M 1.1% |
| Interest Expense | $2.1M 0.5% | $618K 0.2% | $3.4M 0.5% | $4.2M 0.5% | $6.4M 0.7% | $13.8M 2.2% | $20.6M 3.5% | $5.0M 1.1% | $54K 0.0% | — |
| Pretax Income | -$62.4M -13.8% | -$64.9M -16.2% | $45.8M 7.2% | $126.7M 15.6% | $192.3M 21.7% | -$13.2M -2.1% | -$72.1M -12.4% | -$31.9M -7.1% | $35.4M 10.0% | $6.0M 2.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $11.9M 2.6% | $4.9M 1.2% | $17.7M 2.8% | $29.9M 3.7% | $25.0M 2.8% | $666K 0.1% | -$3.1M -0.5% | $631K 0.1% | $2.2M 0.6% | $2.7M 1.0% |
| Net Income | -$74.3M -16.4% | -$69.8M -17.4% | $28.2M 4.4% | $96.8M 11.9% | $167.3M 18.9% | -$13.8M -2.2% | -$69.7M -11.9% | -$32.2M -7.1% | $32.8M 9.3% | $3.0M 1.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.59 | $-1.49 | $0.59 | $2.01 | $3.53 | $-0.33 | $-1.69 | $-1.01 | $1.18 | $0.11 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.59 | $-1.49 | $0.59 | $1.98 | $3.45 | $-0.33 | $-1.69 | $-1.01 | $1.14 | $0.11 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 46.7M | 46.9M | 47.5M | 48.2M | 47.4M | 41.9M | 41.2M | 31.8M | 27.8M | 26.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 46.7M | 46.9M | 48.0M | 48.8M | 48.5M | 41.9M | 41.2M | 31.8M | 28.9M | 27.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position