Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 313 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| COTY | $2.5B | — | 9.3× | 0.4× | -3.7% | 64.8% | -6.2% | -10.4% | -4.9% | 6.0× | 313 |
Peers = companies sharing COTY's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $257M is below the $1.2B due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-06-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~5.7% on $4.0B of debt.
Cash of $257M fully covers short-term debt of $4M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.83 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 1.7%/yr for a decade (off $477M normalized FCF).
The market's 1.7% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.87B shares · net debt $3.7B
mean 11.2% · volatility σ 90% · implied rate exceeded in 3/8 yrs
Central path = implied 1.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (90%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $406M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.89B 100.0% | $6.12B 100.0% | $5.55B 100.0% | $5.30B 100.0% | $4.63B 100.0% | $4.72B 100.0% | $6.29B 100.0% | $6.84B 100.0% | $7.65B 100.0% | $4.35B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.07B 35.2% | $2.18B 35.6% | $2.01B 36.1% | $1.94B 36.5% | $1.86B 40.2% | $1.99B 42.2% | $2.50B 39.7% | $2.72B 39.7% | $3.03B 39.6% | $1.75B 40.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3.61B 52.7% | $3.03B 39.6% | $1.75B 40.1% |
| Gross Profit | $3.82B 64.8% | $3.94B 64.4% | $3.55B 63.9% | $3.37B 63.5% | $2.77B 59.8% | $2.73B 57.8% | $3.79B 60.3% | $4.12B 60.3% | $4.62B 60.4% | $2.60B 59.9% |
| Research & Development | $123.0M 2.1% | $126.8M 2.1% | $105.2M 1.9% | $97.3M 1.8% | $96.5M 2.1% | $93.4M 2.0% | $98.5M 1.6% | $108.1M 1.6% | $139.2M 1.8% | $47.7M 1.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $3.10B 52.7% | $3.16B 51.7% | $2.82B 50.7% | $2.88B 54.3% | $2.36B 51.0% | $3.12B 66.1% | $3.47B 55.2% | $3.81B 55.6% | $4.04B 52.8% | $2.03B 46.6% |
| Operating Income | $241.1M 4.1% | $546.7M 8.9% | $543.7M 9.8% | $240.9M 4.5% | -$48.6M -1.0% | -$1.24B -26.2% | -$3.69B -58.7% | -$155.5M -2.3% | -$420.9M -5.5% | $254.2M 5.8% |
| Interest Expense | $227.0M 3.9% | $251.6M 4.1% | $261.1M 4.7% | $241.2M 4.5% | $231.8M 5.0% | $233.3M 4.9% | $252.0M 4.0% | $222.7M 3.3% | $219.6M 2.9% | $112.9M 2.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $16.6M 0.3% | $16.1M 0.3% | $15.4M 0.3% | $7.2M 0.1% | $3.5M 0.1% | $5.4M 0.1% | $19.2M 0.3% | $13.6M 0.2% | $4.4M 0.1% | $4.1M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$371.7M -6.3% | -$90.2M -1.5% | $419.0M 7.5% | $409.9M 7.7% | $43.9M 0.9% | $11.6M 0.2% | -$31.8M -0.5% | -$27.7M -0.4% | -$18.5M -0.2% | -$30.4M -0.7% |
| Pretax Income | -$344.8M -5.9% | $204.5M 3.3% | $704.8M 12.7% | $426.8M 8.0% | -$239.8M -5.2% | -$1.47B -31.1% | -$3.95B -62.7% | -$394.5M -5.8% | -$658.0M -8.6% | $138.8M 3.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $5.4M 0.1% | $95.1M 1.6% | $181.6M 3.3% | $164.8M 3.1% | -$172.0M -3.7% | -$377.7M -8.0% | -$54.8M -0.9% | -$32.2M -0.5% | -$259.5M -3.4% | -$40.4M -0.9% |
| Net Income | -$367.9M -6.2% | $89.4M 1.5% | $508.2M 9.1% | $259.5M 4.9% | -$201.3M -4.3% | -$1.01B -21.3% | -$3.78B -60.2% | -$168.8M -2.5% | -$422.2M -5.5% | $156.9M 3.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.44 | $0.09 | $0.58 | $0.08 | $-0.40 | $-1.33 | $-5.04 | $-0.23 | $-0.66 | $0.45 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.44 | $0.09 | $0.57 | $0.08 | $-0.40 | $-1.33 | $-5.04 | $-0.23 | $-0.66 | $0.44 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 870.9M | 874.4M | 849.0M | 820.6M | 764.8M | 759.1M | 751.2M | 749.7M | 642.8M | 345.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 870.9M | 883.4M | 886.5M | 834.1M | 764.8M | 759.1M | 751.2M | 749.7M | 642.8M | 354.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 15.2× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 39.7 | 39.7 | 42.2 | 40.2 | 36.5 | 36.1 | 35.6 | 35.2 |
| Gross Profit | 60.3 | 60.3 | 57.8 | 59.8 | 63.5 | 63.9 | 64.4 | 64.8 |
| R&D | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| SG&A | 55.6 | 55.2 | 66.1 | 51.0 | 54.3 | 50.7 | 51.7 | 52.7 |
| Operating Income | -2.3 | -58.7 | -26.2 | -1.0 | 4.5 | 9.8 | 8.9 | 4.1 |
| Income Tax | -0.5 | -0.9 | -8.0 | -3.7 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -2.5 | -60.2 | -21.3 | -4.3 | 4.9 | 9.1 | 1.5 | -6.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on COTY: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.