Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 196 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| CRSR | $1.2B | — | 76.0× | 0.8× | 11.9% | 28.9% | 1.1% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 7.6× | 196 |
Peers = companies sharing CRSR's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $11.20 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 11.6%/yr for a decade (off $46M normalized FCF).
The market's 11.6% is more optimistic than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.11B shares · net debt $24M
mean 127.5% · volatility σ 226% · implied rate exceeded in 4/6 yrs
Central path = implied 11.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (226%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $35M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $97M covers the $11M due within a year 8.9× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-03-31 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~7.7% on $121M of debt.
Cash of $97M fully covers short-term debt of $6M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.47B 100.0% | $1.32B 100.0% | $1.46B 100.0% | $1.38B 100.0% | $1.90B 100.0% | $1.70B 100.0% | $1.10B 100.0% | $937.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.05B 71.1% | $988.8M 75.1% | $1.10B 75.3% | $1.08B 78.4% | $1.39B 73.0% | $1.24B 72.7% | $872.9M 79.6% | $744.9M 79.4% |
| Gross Profit | $425.9M 28.9% | $327.6M 24.9% | $360.3M 24.7% | $296.6M 21.6% | $513.9M 27.0% | $465.4M 27.3% | $224.3M 20.4% | $192.7M 20.6% |
| Research & Development | $69.1M 4.7% | $67.5M 5.1% | $65.3M 4.5% | $66.5M 4.8% | $60.3M 3.2% | $50.1M 2.9% | $37.5M 3.4% | $32.0M 3.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $354.7M 24.1% | $310.0M 23.6% | $285.3M 19.5% | $284.9M 20.7% | $315.7M 16.6% | $257.0M 15.1% | $163.0M 14.9% | $138.9M 14.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $423.8M 28.8% | $377.6M 28.7% | $350.6M 24.0% | $351.4M 25.6% | $376.0M 19.7% | $307.1M 18.0% | $200.6M 18.3% | $170.9M 18.2% |
| Operating Income | $2.1M 0.1% | -$50.0M -3.8% | $9.7M 0.7% | -$54.8M -4.0% | $137.9M 7.2% | $158.4M 9.3% | $23.7M 2.2% | $21.8M 2.3% |
| Interest Expense | $9.3M 0.6% | $13.2M 1.0% | $17.4M 1.2% | $9.6M 0.7% | $17.7M 0.9% | $35.1M 2.1% | $35.5M 3.2% | $32.7M 3.5% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $1.7M 0.1% | $3.3M 0.3% | $6.8M 0.5% | $374K 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$12.1M -0.8% | -$61.7M -4.7% | -$3.5M -0.2% | -$63.8M -4.6% | $114.6M 6.0% | $122.0M 7.2% | -$13.4M -1.2% | -$10.7M -1.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.8M 0.2% | $21.7M 1.7% | -$2.4M -0.2% | -$9.8M -0.7% | $13.6M 0.7% | $18.8M 1.1% | -$5.0M -0.5% | $3.0M 0.3% |
| Net Income | $16.0M 1.1% | -$85.0M -6.5% | -$3.0M -0.2% | -$54.0M -3.9% | $101.0M 5.3% | $103.2M 6.1% | -$8.4M -0.8% | -$13.7M -1.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.12 | $-0.95 | $0.03 | $-0.63 | $1.08 | $1.20 | $0.11 | $0.18 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.12 | $-0.95 | $0.03 | $-0.63 | $1.01 | $1.14 | $0.11 | $0.18 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 106.0M | 104.2M | 102.5M | 96.3M | 93.3M | 86.3M | 76.2M | 75.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 106.0M | 104.2M | 106.3M | 96.3M | 100.0M | 90.6M | 76.2M | 75.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 55th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 79.4 | 79.6 | 72.7 | 73.0 | 78.4 | 75.3 | 75.1 | 71.1 |
| Gross Profit | 20.6 | 20.4 | 27.3 | 27.0 | 21.6 | 24.7 | 24.9 | 28.9 |
| R&D | 3.4 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 4.7 |
| SG&A | 14.8 | 14.9 | 15.1 | 16.6 | 20.7 | 19.5 | 23.6 | 24.1 |
| Operating Income | 2.3 | 2.2 | 9.3 | 7.2 | -4.0 | 0.7 | -3.8 | 0.1 |
| Income Tax | 0.3 | -0.5 | 1.1 | 0.7 | -0.7 | -0.2 | 1.7 | 0.2 |
| Net Income | -1.5 | -0.8 | 6.1 | 5.3 | -3.9 | -0.2 | -6.5 | 1.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CRSR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.