Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -0.79% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 1111 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLY | $1.05T | 51.0× | — | 16.1× | 44.7% | 83.0% | 31.7% | 77.8% | 29.9% | — | 4,193 |
| AKTX | $679.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | -61.1% | -61.1% | — | 1 |
| JNJ | $620.1B | 23.4× | — | 6.6× | 6.0% | 67.9% | 28.5% | 32.9% | 20.7% | — | 4,451 |
| ABBV | $435.4B | 104.3× | 31.4× | 7.1× | 8.6% | 70.2% | 6.9% | -129% | 6.6% | 4.2× | 3,895 |
| UNH | $374.0B | 31.2× | 21.4× | 0.8× | 11.8% | 88.7% | 2.7% | 12.0% | 6.8% | 3.9× | 2,891 |
| BDRX | $359.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| MRK | $321.1B | 17.6× | — | 4.9× | 1.3% | 74.8% | 28.1% | 34.7% | 17.9% | — | 3,594 |
| NVSEF | $289.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| AZN | $250.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,248 |
| AMGN | $219.7B | 28.7× | 18.3× | 6.0× | 10.0% | 67.2% | 21.0% | 89.1% | 13.1% | 3.5× | 3,014 |
| TMO | $217.8B | 32.6× | 28.5× | 4.9× | 3.9% | — | 15.1% | 12.6% | 7.0% | 4.9× | 2,481 |
| ABT | $183.9B | 28.4× | 19.5× | 4.2× | 5.7% | 56.4% | 14.7% | 12.5% | 10.5% | 1.0× | 2,964 |
| GILD | $163.5B | 19.4× | 18.1× | 5.5× | 2.4% | 78.8% | 28.9% | 37.5% | 17.9% | 2.4× | 2,218 |
| PFE | $146.7B | 19.0× | — | 2.3× | -1.6% | 74.3% | 12.4% | 9.0% | 5.1% | — | 2,838 |
| DHR | $141.1B | 39.5× | 29.3× | 5.7× | 2.9% | 59.1% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 5.1% | 3.4× | 2,083 |
| ISRG | $133.2B | 47.7× | 36.6× | 13.2× | 20.5% | 66.0% | 28.4% | 16.0% | 16.0% | — | 2,190 |
| SYK | $128.8B | 40.1× | 21.8× | 5.1× | 11.2% | 64.0% | 12.9% | 14.5% | 8.5% | 2.5× | 2,196 |
| CVS | $126.0B | 71.3× | 12.7× | 0.3× | 7.8% | 45.0% | 0.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 0.0× | 1,795 |
| VRTX | $123.1B | 31.6× | 26.9× | 10.3× | 8.9% | 86.2% | 32.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | — | 1,609 |
| MDT | $110.1B | 23.1× | 11.7× | 3.0× | 8.4% | 65.0% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 0.2× | 2,114 |
| GLAXF | $106.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| MCK | $102.7B | 22.9× | 16.2× | 0.3× | 12.4% | 3.6% | 1.2% | -219% | 109% | 1.0× | 1,946 |
| SNYNF | $101.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| HCA | $92.0B | 14.5× | — | 1.2× | 7.1% | — | 9.0% | -113% | 16.8% | — | 1,346 |
| ELV | $86.4B | 15.5× | 14.8× | 0.4× | 12.5% | 89.4% | 2.8% | 12.9% | 7.6% | 4.2× | 1,397 |
| CRVW | $33M | — | 1146.7× | 3.7× | 9.3% | — | -35.5% | 7.4% | 7.4% | — | 1 |
Peers = companies sharing CRVW's sector (Healthcare) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $2M is below the $9M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2017-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M 100.0% | $8.3M 100.0% | $9.7M 100.0% | $7.9M 100.0% | $7.8M 100.0% | $6.5M 100.0% | $6.3M 100.0% | $6.1M 100.0% | $6.3M 100.0% | $6.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | $28K 0.4% | $30K 0.5% | $103K 1.7% | $99K 1.6% | — |
| Research & Development | $2.4M 26.8% | $2.4M 28.5% | $2.5M 25.8% | $2.0M 24.9% | $1.7M 21.9% | $1.7M 26.3% | $1.4M 22.2% | $1.4M 23.4% | $1.6M 26.3% | $1.3M 21.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $2.4M 26.1% | $2.8M 33.3% | $3.2M 33.5% | $3.1M 39.2% | $3.2M 41.4% | $2.7M 41.9% | $4.1M 64.4% | $3.2M 53.0% | $4.0M 64.1% | $3.8M 62.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $9.1M 100.6% | $9.8M 119.1% | $10.4M 107.1% | $9.2M 116.1% | $8.9M 114.7% | $8.4M 128.9% | $9.5M 151.5% | $9.7M 159.9% | $12.9M 205.6% | $12.3M 205.6% |
| Operating Income | -$55K -0.6% | -$1.6M -19.1% | -$688K -7.1% | -$1.3M -16.1% | -$1.1M -14.7% | -$1.9M -28.9% | -$3.2M -51.5% | -$3.7M -59.9% | -$6.6M -105.6% | -$6.3M -105.6% |
| Interest Expense | $3.2M 35.6% | $3.2M 38.9% | $3.2M 33.1% | $6.3M 79.3% | $9.0M 114.7% | $10.6M 163.3% | $10.9M 172.4% | $12.5M 204.3% | $13.5M 215.1% | $12.6M 210.8% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $69K 0.8% | $55K 0.7% | $19K 0.2% | $497 0.0% | $138 0.0% | $400 0.0% | $761 0.0% | $3K 0.1% | $9K 0.1% | $17K 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$3.1M -34.8% | -$3.2M -38.2% | -$3.2M -32.9% | -$4.8M -60.4% | -$8.9M -114.5% | -$9.8M -151.1% | -$10.9M -173.2% | -$12.4M -203.8% | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$3.2M -35.4% | -$4.7M -57.3% | -$3.9M -40.0% | -$6.0M -76.5% | -$10.1M -129.2% | -$11.7M -180.1% | -$14.1M -224.7% | -$16.1M -263.7% | -$20.1M -320.4% | -$18.7M -312.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $6K 0.1% | -$29K -0.4% | $75K 0.8% | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | — |
| Net Income | -$3.2M -35.5% | -$4.7M -57.0% | -$4.0M -40.8% | -$6.0M -76.5% | -$10.1M -129.2% | -$11.7M -180.1% | -$14.1M -224.7% | -$16.1M -263.7% | -$20.1M -320.4% | -$18.6M -311.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.01 | $-0.01 | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | — | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 583.9M | 583.9M | 448.5M | 141.9M | 139.4M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | — | 448.5M | 141.9M | 139.4M | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $0.06 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 18.1%/yr for a decade (off $741678 normalized FCF).
The market's 18.1% is more optimistic than its 4-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.58B shares · net debt -$2M
mean -157.9% · volatility σ 10% · implied rate exceeded in 0/2 yrs
Central path = implied 18.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (10%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $796532 FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 1 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 71th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D | 23.4 | 22.2 | 26.3 | 21.9 | 24.9 | 25.8 | 28.5 | 26.8 |
| SG&A | 53.0 | 64.4 | 41.9 | 41.4 | 39.2 | 33.5 | 33.3 | 26.1 |
| Operating Income | -59.9 | -51.5 | -28.9 | -14.7 | -16.1 | -7.1 | -19.1 | -0.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | — | 0.8 | -0.4 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -263.7 | -224.7 | -180.1 | -129.2 | -76.5 | -40.8 | -57.0 | -35.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CRVW: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.