Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +3.01% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| CSV | $652M | 12.7× | 5.4× | 1.6× | 3.3% | 35.1% | 12.3% | 20.2% | 19.8% | 0.0× | 158 |
Peers = companies sharing CSV's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 20%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $2M covers the $1M due within a year 1.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2019-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~508.2% on $6M of debt.
Cash of $2M fully covers short-term debt of $607000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $417.4M 100.0% | $404.2M 100.0% | $382.5M 100.0% | $370.2M 100.0% | $375.9M 100.0% | $329.4M 100.0% | $274.1M 100.0% | $268.0M 100.0% | $258.1M 100.0% | $248.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $270.8M 64.9% | $260.8M 64.5% | $258.2M 67.5% | $250.9M 67.8% | $246.4M 65.5% | $223.5M 67.8% | $194.5M 71.0% | $192.0M 71.7% | $181.3M 70.2% | $168.6M 67.9% |
| Gross Profit | $146.7M 35.1% | $143.4M 35.5% | $124.3M 32.5% | $119.2M 32.2% | $129.5M 34.5% | $105.9M 32.2% | $79.6M 29.0% | $75.9M 28.3% | $76.8M 29.8% | $79.7M 32.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $48.6M 11.7% | $59.0M 14.6% | $42.1M 11.0% | $37.5M 10.1% | $35.2M 9.4% | $27.3M 8.3% | $25.9M 9.4% | $30.8M 11.5% | $26.3M 10.2% | $27.9M 11.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | $27.3M 10.0% | $32.6M 12.2% | $27.9M 10.8% | $29.4M 11.9% |
| Operating Income | $97.7M 23.4% | $81.8M 20.2% | $81.0M 21.2% | $79.7M 21.5% | $93.7M 24.9% | $57.2M 17.4% | $47.4M 17.3% | $42.1M 15.7% | $48.9M 19.0% | $50.2M 20.2% |
| Interest Expense | $28.4M 6.8% | $32.1M 7.9% | $36.3M 9.5% | $25.9M 7.0% | $25.4M 6.8% | $32.5M 9.9% | $25.5M 9.3% | $21.1M 7.9% | $12.9M 5.0% | $11.7M 4.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $971K 0.2% | -$61K -0.0% | $1.4M 0.4% | $82K 0.0% | -$84K -0.0% | $152K 0.0% | $736K 0.3% | -$43K -0.0% | $1.1M 0.4% | -$18.0M -7.2% |
| Pretax Income | $70.3M 16.8% | $50.1M 12.4% | $46.4M 12.1% | $57.2M 15.5% | $44.3M 11.8% | $24.6M 7.5% | $22.4M 8.2% | $18.3M 6.8% | $32.8M 12.7% | $32.2M 13.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $18.8M 4.5% | $17.1M 4.2% | $13.0M 3.4% | $16.2M 4.4% | $12.3M 3.3% | $8.0M 2.4% | $7.4M 2.7% | $5.8M 2.1% | $13.1M 5.1% | $12.7M 5.1% |
| Net Income | $51.5M 12.3% | $33.0M 8.2% | $33.4M 8.7% | $41.4M 11.2% | $33.2M 8.8% | $16.1M 4.9% | $14.5M 5.3% | $11.6M 4.3% | $37.2M 14.4% | $19.6M 7.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.29 | $2.17 | $2.24 | $2.78 | $1.90 | $0.90 | $0.81 | $0.64 | $2.25 | $1.18 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.25 | $2.10 | $2.14 | $2.63 | $1.81 | $0.89 | $0.80 | $0.63 | $2.09 | $1.12 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 15.4M | 15.0M | 14.8M | 14.9M | 17.4M | 17.9M | 17.9M | 18.0M | 16.4M | 16.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 15.6M | 15.4M | 15.5M | 15.7M | 18.3M | 18.1M | 18.0M | 18.4M | 17.7M | 17.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $41.40 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.5%/yr for a decade (off $45M normalized FCF).
The market's 3.5% is in line with its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $4M
mean 16.2% · volatility σ 62% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 3.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (62%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 18% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $7M dividends + $0 buybacks = $7M returned on $40M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 39th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 71.7 | 71.0 | 67.8 | 65.5 | 67.8 | 67.5 | 64.5 | 64.9 |
| Gross Profit | 28.3 | 29.0 | 32.2 | 34.5 | 32.2 | 32.5 | 35.5 | 35.1 |
| SG&A | 11.5 | 9.4 | 8.3 | 9.4 | 10.1 | 11.0 | 14.6 | 11.7 |
| Operating Income | 15.7 | 17.3 | 17.4 | 24.9 | 21.5 | 21.2 | 20.2 | 23.4 |
| Income Tax | 2.1 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Net Income | 4.3 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 8.8 | 11.2 | 8.7 | 8.2 | 12.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CSV: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.