Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.40% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $21M covers all $15M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~5.2% on $14M of debt.
Cash of $21M fully covers short-term debt of $1M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| CWGL | $85M | 138.3× | 25.1× | 1.3× | -10.8% | 47.2% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 4.5× | 4 |
Peers = companies sharing CWGL's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 4 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $65.1M 100.0% | $73.0M 100.0% | $72.4M 100.0% | $74.2M 100.0% | $68.9M 100.0% | $64.1M 100.0% | $67.1M 100.0% | $67.8M 100.0% | $63.2M 100.0% | $64.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $34.4M 52.8% | $37.9M 52.0% | $38.7M 53.5% | $41.5M 55.8% | $38.9M 56.4% | $44.4M 69.3% | $42.0M 62.6% | $37.5M 55.3% | $32.0M 50.6% | $31.7M 49.0% |
| Gross Profit | $30.7M 47.2% | $35.1M 48.0% | $33.7M 46.5% | $32.8M 44.2% | $30.1M 43.6% | $19.7M 30.7% | $25.1M 37.4% | $30.3M 44.7% | $31.2M 49.4% | $33.0M 51.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $32.1M 49.3% | $34.2M 46.8% | $31.7M 43.7% | $30.5M 41.1% | $28.8M 41.8% | $25.6M 40.0% | $29.7M 44.3% | $27.0M 39.9% | $26.2M 41.4% | $10.7M 16.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | $29.7M 44.3% | $27.0M 39.9% | $26.2M 41.4% | $26.5M 41.0% |
| Operating Income | -$3.7M -5.7% | $68K 0.1% | $2.0M 2.7% | $2.0M 2.7% | $244K 0.4% | -$8.9M -13.8% | -$7.1M -10.6% | $1.7M 2.6% | $4.9M 7.7% | $6.2M 9.7% |
| Interest Expense | $741K 1.1% | $781K 1.1% | $826K 1.1% | $926K 1.2% | $1.0M 1.5% | $1.1M 1.7% | $1.1M 1.6% | $1.2M 1.7% | $910K 1.4% | $840K 1.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $4.6M 7.1% | $1.1M 1.4% | $2.3M 3.2% | -$511K -0.7% | $3.2M 4.7% | -$622K -1.0% | -$628K -0.9% | -$382K -0.6% | -$324K -0.5% | -$342K -0.5% |
| Pretax Income | $876K 1.3% | $1.1M 1.5% | $4.3M 5.9% | $1.5M 2.0% | $3.5M 5.0% | -$9.5M -14.8% | -$7.7M -11.5% | $1.4M 2.0% | $4.5M 7.2% | $5.9M 9.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $263K 0.4% | $270K 0.4% | $1.1M 1.6% | $381K 0.5% | $286K 0.4% | -$3.1M -4.8% | -$2.1M -3.1% | $366K 0.5% | -$993K -1.6% | $2.6M 4.1% |
| Net Income | $613K 0.9% | $851K 1.2% | $3.1M 4.3% | $1.1M 1.5% | $3.2M 4.6% | -$6.4M -10.0% | -$5.7M -8.4% | $995K 1.5% | $5.5M 8.7% | $3.3M 5.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.03 | $0.04 | $0.15 | $0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.28 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.03 | $0.04 | $0.15 | $0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.28 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 20.6M | 20.8M | 21.3M | 22.3M | 22.8M | 23.2M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 20.6M | 20.8M | 21.3M | 22.3M | 22.8M | 23.2M | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $351000 buybacks = $351000 returned on -$3M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 34th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 515.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 55.3 | 62.6 | 69.3 | 56.4 | 55.8 | 53.5 | 52.0 | 52.8 |
| Gross Profit | 44.7 | 37.4 | 30.7 | 43.6 | 44.2 | 46.5 | 48.0 | 47.2 |
| SG&A | 39.9 | 44.3 | 40.0 | 41.8 | 41.1 | 43.7 | 46.8 | 49.3 |
| Operating Income | 2.6 | -10.6 | -13.8 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0.1 | -5.7 |
| Income Tax | 0.5 | -3.1 | -4.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Net Income | 1.5 | -8.4 | -10.0 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CWGL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.