Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +2.46% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| CXDO | $205M | 41.4× | 41.9× | 3.0× | 12.0% | — | 7.4% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 0.0× | 103 |
Peers = companies sharing CXDO's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
$111000 of principal comes due within a year. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2023-09-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $6.63 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 14.3%/yr for a decade (off $6M normalized FCF).
The market's 14.3% is more conservative than its 2-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt $114000
mean 66.0% · volatility σ 25% · implied rate exceeded in 2/2 yrs
Central path = implied 14.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (25%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $9M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $68.2M 100.0% | $60.8M 100.0% | $53.2M 100.0% | $37.6M 100.0% | $28.1M 100.0% | $16.4M 100.0% | $14.4M 100.0% | $11.9M 100.0% | $10.2M 100.0% | $9.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | $4.9M 30.2% | $4.4M 30.1% | — | $549K 5.4% | $3.6M 39.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $549K 5.4% | $632K 6.9% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.9M 28.5% | $3.0M 32.8% |
| Research & Development | $5.7M 8.4% | $5.6M 9.1% | $4.9M 9.1% | $4.0M 10.5% | $1.4M 5.0% | $1.2M 7.3% | $853K 5.9% | $801K 6.7% | $750K 7.4% | $826K 9.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $14.7M 21.6% | $13.8M 22.7% | $13.8M 25.9% | $12.9M 34.4% | $10.6M 37.7% | $5.1M 31.2% | $4.2M 29.3% | $4.1M 34.4% | $4.1M 40.0% | $4.9M 53.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $63.5M 93.1% | $59.0M 97.0% | $54.9M 103.2% | $74.9M 199.6% | $30.9M 110.0% | $15.4M 94.0% | $13.3M 92.1% | $12.1M 101.7% | $10.9M 107.2% | $11.9M 130.3% |
| Operating Income | $4.7M 6.9% | $1.8M 3.0% | -$1.7M -3.2% | -$37.4M -99.6% | -$2.8M -10.0% | $991K 6.0% | $1.1M 7.9% | -$206K -1.7% | -$734K -7.2% | -$2.8M -30.3% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $115K 0.2% | $78K 0.2% | $84K 0.3% | $76K 0.5% | $12K 0.1% | $12K 0.1% | $209K 2.1% | $138K 1.5% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $637K 0.9% | $191K 0.3% | $2K 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $1K 0.0% | $3K 0.0% | $6K 0.0% | $7K 0.1% | $10K 0.1% | $15K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $681K 1.0% | $65K 0.1% | $1.4M 2.7% | $1.2M 3.2% | -$100K -0.4% | $908K 5.5% | $10K 0.1% | -$2K -0.0% | -$188K -1.8% | -$17K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $5.4M 7.9% | $1.9M 3.1% | -$264K -0.5% | -$36.2M -96.3% | -$2.9M -10.4% | $1.9M 11.6% | $1.1M 7.9% | -$208K -1.7% | -$1.0M -9.9% | -$2.8M -30.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $300K 0.4% | $212K 0.3% | $98K 0.2% | -$762K -2.0% | -$465K -1.7% | $6.0M 36.9% | $6K 0.0% | $15K 0.1% | $7K 0.1% | $12K 0.1% |
| Net Income | $5.1M 7.4% | $1.7M 2.8% | -$362K -0.7% | -$35.4M -94.3% | -$2.4M -8.7% | $7.9M 48.5% | $1.1M 7.9% | -$223K -1.9% | -$929K -9.1% | -$2.8M -30.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.17 | $0.06 | $-0.01 | $-1.54 | $-0.12 | $0.50 | $0.08 | $-0.02 | $-0.07 | $-0.21 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.16 | $0.06 | $-0.01 | $-1.54 | $-0.12 | $0.46 | $0.07 | $-0.02 | $-0.07 | $-0.21 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 29.7M | 26.8M | 25.9M | 22.9M | 20.28B | 15.8M | 14.6M | 14.3M | 13.9M | 13.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 31.6M | 30.0M | 25.9M | 22.9M | 20.28B | 17.4M | 15.6M | 14.3M | 13.9M | 13.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 52th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 13.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | 30.1 | 30.2 | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D | 6.7 | 5.9 | 7.3 | 5.0 | 10.5 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 8.4 |
| SG&A | 34.4 | 29.3 | 31.2 | 37.7 | 34.4 | 25.9 | 22.7 | 21.6 |
| Operating Income | -1.7 | 7.9 | 6.0 | -10.0 | -99.6 | -3.2 | 3.0 | 6.9 |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | 0.0 | 36.9 | -1.7 | -2.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Net Income | -1.9 | 7.9 | 48.5 | -8.7 | -94.3 | -0.7 | 2.8 | 7.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CXDO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.