Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 402 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $35.00 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -1.9%/yr for a decade (off $854M normalized FCF).
The market's -1.9% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.27B shares · net debt -$891M
mean 27.5% · volatility σ 38% · implied rate exceeded in 9/9 yrs
Central path = implied -1.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (38%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.52B 100.0% | $2.55B 100.0% | $2.50B 100.0% | $2.32B 100.0% | $2.16B 100.0% | $1.91B 100.0% | $1.66B 100.0% | $1.39B 100.0% | $1.11B 100.0% | $844.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $500.8M 19.9% | $445.1M 17.5% | $478.5M 19.1% | $444.2M 19.1% | $444.2M 20.6% | $414.6M 21.7% | $411.0M 24.7% | $394.7M 28.4% | $368.9M 33.3% | $390.6M 46.2% |
| Gross Profit | $2.02B 80.1% | $2.10B 82.5% | $2.02B 80.9% | $1.88B 80.9% | $1.71B 79.4% | $1.50B 78.3% | $1.25B 75.3% | $997.0M 71.6% | $737.9M 66.7% | $454.2M 53.8% |
| Research & Development | $732.0M 29.0% | $914.9M 35.9% | $936.5M 37.4% | $891.9M 38.4% | $755.9M 35.0% | $727.5M 38.0% | $662.1M 39.9% | $768.2M 55.2% | $380.3M 34.4% | $289.7M 34.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $230.5M 9.1% | $241.2M 9.5% | $237.1M 9.5% | $222.9M 9.6% | $224.6M 10.4% | $227.8M 11.9% | $245.4M 14.8% | $283.2M 20.3% | $157.3M 14.2% | $107.4M 12.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.33B 52.8% | $1.62B 63.5% | $1.48B 59.3% | $1.70B 73.1% | $1.44B 66.7% | $1.78B 92.8% | $1.33B 80.1% | $1.49B 107.1% | $851.6M 76.9% | $647.7M 76.7% |
| Operating Income | $689.1M 27.3% | $486.2M 19.1% | $538.7M 21.5% | $181.3M 7.8% | $274.4M 12.7% | -$277.0M -14.5% | -$80.5M -4.8% | -$494.0M -35.5% | -$113.7M -10.3% | -$193.5M -22.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $7.1M 0.3% | $9.7M 0.4% | -$3.7M -0.1% | $8.1M 0.3% | $30.1M 1.4% | $25.1M 1.3% | $16.0M 1.0% | $6.8M 0.5% | $13.2M 1.2% | $4.9M 0.6% |
| Pretax Income | $617.6M 24.5% | $509.8M 20.0% | $554.4M 22.2% | $192.7M 8.3% | $299.3M 13.9% | -$250.2M -13.1% | -$52.0M -3.1% | -$480.1M -34.5% | -$111.5M -10.1% | -$205.0M -24.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $109.2M 4.3% | $57.5M 2.3% | $100.8M 4.0% | -$360.5M -15.5% | -$36.5M -1.7% | $6.1M 0.3% | $700K 0.0% | $4.8M 0.3% | $200K 0.0% | $5.2M 0.6% |
| Net Income | $508.4M 20.2% | $452.3M 17.7% | $453.6M 18.1% | $553.2M 23.8% | $335.8M 15.6% | -$256.3M -13.4% | -$52.7M -3.2% | -$484.9M -34.8% | -$111.7M -10.1% | -$210.2M -24.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.89 | $1.42 | $1.33 | $1.53 | $0.87 | $-0.62 | $-0.13 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.86 | $1.40 | $1.31 | $1.52 | $0.85 | $-0.62 | $-0.13 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 268.3M | 318.2M | 341.2M | 361.2M | 388.0M | 414.3M | 411.6M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 272.8M | 323.4M | 345.6M | 363.3M | 395.8M | 414.3M | 411.6M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1.7B buybacks = $1.7B returned on $931M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -28%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $891M covers the $0 due within a year 891300000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 29th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 28.4 | 24.7 | 21.7 | 20.6 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 17.5 | 19.9 |
| Gross Profit | 71.6 | 75.3 | 78.3 | 79.4 | 80.9 | 80.9 | 82.5 | 80.1 |
| R&D | 55.2 | 39.9 | 38.0 | 35.0 | 38.4 | 37.4 | 35.9 | 29.0 |
| SG&A | 20.3 | 14.8 | 11.9 | 10.4 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.1 |
| Operating Income | -35.5 | -4.8 | -14.5 | 12.7 | 7.8 | 21.5 | 19.1 | 27.3 |
| Income Tax | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | -1.7 | -15.5 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 4.3 |
| Net Income | -34.8 | -3.2 | -13.4 | 15.6 | 23.8 | 18.1 | 17.7 | 20.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DBX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| DBX | $9.4B | 18.8× | 10.4× | 3.7× | -1.1% | 80.1% | 20.2% | -28.3% | -28.3% | — | 402 |
Peers = companies sharing DBX's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.