Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 196 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| DDD | $461M | 18.8× | — | 1.2× | -12.1% | 33.9% | 7.7% | 12.4% | 9.2% | -1.1× | 196 |
Peers = companies sharing DDD's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $386.9M 100.0% | $440.1M 100.0% | $488.1M 100.0% | $538.0M 100.0% | $615.6M 100.0% | $557.2M 100.0% | $636.4M 100.0% | $691.5M 100.0% | $646.1M 100.0% | $633.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $255.9M 66.1% | $275.9M 62.7% | $291.6M 59.8% | $323.8M 60.2% | $351.9M 57.2% | $333.9M 59.9% | $355.8M 55.9% | $367.2M 53.1% | $341.2M 52.8% | $323.2M 51.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $203.5M 31.5% | $195.4M 30.9% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $137.7M 21.3% | $127.8M 20.2% |
| Gross Profit | $131.0M 33.9% | $164.2M 37.3% | $196.4M 40.2% | $214.2M 39.8% | $263.8M 42.8% | $223.4M 40.1% | $280.5M 44.1% | $324.4M 46.9% | $304.8M 47.2% | $309.8M 48.9% |
| Research & Development | $65.0M 16.8% | $86.5M 19.6% | $89.5M 18.3% | $87.1M 16.2% | $69.2M 11.2% | $74.1M 13.3% | $83.3M 13.1% | $95.3M 13.8% | $94.6M 14.6% | $88.4M 14.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $161.3M 41.7% | $210.1M 47.7% | $210.2M 43.1% | $244.2M 45.4% | $227.7M 37.0% | $219.9M 39.5% | $254.4M 40.0% | $272.3M 39.4% | $264.2M 40.9% | $259.8M 41.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $227.1M 58.7% | $441.6M 100.3% | $602.4M 123.4% | $331.3M 61.6% | $296.8M 48.2% | $342.3M 61.4% | $337.6M 53.1% | $367.6M 53.2% | $358.8M 55.5% | $348.2M 55.0% |
| Operating Income | -$96.1M -24.8% | -$277.4M -63.0% | -$406.0M -83.2% | -$117.0M -21.7% | -$33.1M -5.4% | -$119.0M -21.3% | -$57.1M -9.0% | -$43.2M -6.2% | -$54.0M -8.4% | -$38.4M -6.1% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | $2.3M 0.4% | $4.4M 0.8% | $4.4M 0.7% | $1.2M 0.2% | $919K 0.1% | $1.3M 0.2% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $4.0M 1.0% | $7.3M 1.7% | $19.5M 4.0% | $9.4M 1.7% | $438K 0.1% | $400K 0.1% | $1.2M 0.2% | $789K 0.1% | $784K 0.1% | $807K 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $145.7M 37.7% | $27.4M 6.2% | $43.7M 9.0% | -$3.8M -0.7% | $352.6M 57.3% | -$24.4M -4.4% | -$8.0M -1.3% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $49.6M 12.8% | -$250.0M -56.8% | -$362.3M -74.2% | -$120.8M -22.5% | $319.5M 51.9% | -$143.4M -25.7% | -$65.1M -10.2% | -$43.2M -6.3% | -$57.5M -8.9% | -$39.8M -6.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $14.9M 3.8% | $2.2M 0.5% | -$641K -0.1% | $2.1M 0.4% | -$2.5M -0.4% | $6.2M 1.1% | $4.5M 0.7% | $2.0M 0.3% | $7.8M 1.2% | -$547K -0.1% |
| Net Income | $29.9M 7.7% | -$256.9M -58.4% | -$362.7M -74.3% | -$121.7M -22.6% | $322.1M 52.3% | -$149.6M -26.8% | -$69.9M -11.0% | -$45.5M -6.6% | -$66.2M -10.2% | -$38.4M -6.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.23 | $-1.94 | $-2.79 | $-0.96 | $2.62 | $-1.27 | $-0.61 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.19 | $-1.94 | $-2.79 | $-0.96 | $2.55 | $-1.27 | $-0.61 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 129.2M | 131.9M | 129.9M | 127.8M | 122.9M | 117.6M | 113.8M | 112.3M | 111.6M | 111.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 175.5M | 131.9M | 129.9M | 127.8M | 126.3M | 117.6M | 113.8M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $15M buybacks = $15M returned on -$98M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~0.5% on $447M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2021 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $96M fully covers short-term debt of $4M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 39th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.4× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 53.1 | 55.9 | 59.9 | 57.2 | 60.2 | 59.8 | 62.7 | 66.1 |
| Gross Profit | 46.9 | 44.1 | 40.1 | 42.8 | 39.8 | 40.2 | 37.3 | 33.9 |
| R&D | 13.8 | 13.1 | 13.3 | 11.2 | 16.2 | 18.3 | 19.6 | 16.8 |
| SG&A | 39.4 | 40.0 | 39.5 | 37.0 | 45.4 | 43.1 | 47.7 | 41.7 |
| Operating Income | -6.2 | -9.0 | -21.3 | -5.4 | -21.7 | -83.2 | -63.0 | -24.8 |
| Income Tax | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.1 | -0.4 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 0.5 | 3.8 |
| Net Income | -6.6 | -11.0 | -26.8 | 52.3 | -22.6 | -74.3 | -58.4 | 7.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DDD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.