Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 823 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| DECK | $13.9B | 14.2× | 9.0× | 2.5× | 9.8% | 57.7% | 18.7% | 41.0% | 41.0% | — | 823 |
Peers = companies sharing DECK's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $99.31 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 0.7%/yr for a decade (off $1000M normalized FCF).
The market's 0.7% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.14B shares · net debt -$1.9B
mean 57.9% · volatility σ 105% · implied rate exceeded in 7/9 yrs
Central path = implied 0.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (105%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1.1B buybacks = $1.1B returned on $1.1B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 41%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 16d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.47B 100.0% | $4.99B 100.0% | $4.29B 100.0% | $3.63B 100.0% | $3.15B 100.0% | $2.55B 100.0% | $2.13B 100.0% | $2.02B 100.0% | $1.90B 100.0% | $1.79B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.31B 42.3% | $2.10B 42.1% | $1.90B 44.4% | $1.80B 49.7% | $1.54B 49.0% | $1.17B 46.0% | $1.03B 48.2% | $980.2M 48.5% | $971.7M 51.1% | $954.9M 53.3% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $971.7M 51.1% | $954.9M 53.3% |
| Gross Profit | $3.16B 57.7% | $2.89B 57.9% | $2.39B 55.6% | $1.83B 50.3% | $1.61B 51.0% | $1.37B 54.0% | $1.10B 51.8% | $1.04B 51.5% | $931.6M 48.9% | $835.2M 46.7% |
| Research & Development | $68.9M 1.3% | $56.7M 1.1% | $49.2M 1.1% | $38.7M 1.1% | $33.3M 1.1% | $28.6M 1.1% | $27.6M 1.3% | $23.2M 1.1% | $22.4M 1.2% | $21.3M 1.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.89B 34.6% | $1.71B 34.2% | $1.46B 34.0% | $1.17B 32.3% | $1.04B 33.1% | $869.9M 34.2% | $765.5M 35.9% | $712.9M 35.3% | $709.1M 37.3% | $837.2M 46.8% |
| Operating Income | $1.26B 23.1% | $1.18B 23.6% | $927.5M 21.6% | $652.8M 18.0% | $564.7M 17.9% | $504.2M 19.8% | $338.1M 15.9% | $327.3M 16.2% | $222.6M 11.7% | -$1.9M -0.1% |
| Interest Expense | $2.5M 0.0% | $3.5M 0.1% | $2.6M 0.1% | $3.4M 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $63.6M 1.2% | $68.4M 1.4% | $52.2M 1.2% | $15.6M 0.4% | $1.9M 0.1% | $2.6M 0.1% | $7.3M 0.3% | $6.0M 0.3% | $3.1M 0.2% | $778K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $63.5M 1.2% | $64.2M 1.3% | $51.4M 1.2% | $13.3M 0.4% | -$69K -0.0% | -$2.7M -0.1% | $2.7M 0.1% | $1.6M 0.1% | -$1.9M -0.1% | -$5.1M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $220.7M 11.6% | -$7.0M -0.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $302.3M 5.5% | $277.2M 5.6% | $219.4M 5.1% | $149.3M 4.1% | $112.7M 3.6% | $118.9M 4.7% | $64.7M 3.0% | $64.6M 3.2% | $106.3M 5.6% | -$12.7M -0.7% |
| Net Income | $1.02B 18.7% | $966.1M 19.4% | $759.6M 17.7% | $516.8M 14.2% | $451.9M 14.3% | $382.6M 15.0% | $276.1M 12.9% | $264.3M 13.1% | $114.4M 6.0% | $5.7M 0.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $7.04 | $6.36 | $4.89 | $3.25 | $16.43 | $13.64 | $9.73 | $8.92 | $3.60 | $0.18 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $7.02 | $6.33 | $4.86 | $3.23 | $16.26 | $13.47 | $9.62 | $8.84 | $3.58 | $0.18 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 145.5M | 152.0M | 155.2M | 159.0M | 27.5M | 28.1M | 28.4M | 29.6M | 31.8M | 32.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 145.8M | 152.7M | 156.3M | 160.1M | 27.8M | 28.4M | 28.7M | 29.9M | 32.0M | 32.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 72th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 48.5 | 48.2 | 46.0 | 49.0 | 49.7 | 44.4 | 42.1 | 42.3 |
| Gross Profit | 51.5 | 51.8 | 54.0 | 51.0 | 50.3 | 55.6 | 57.9 | 57.7 |
| R&D | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| SG&A | 35.3 | 35.9 | 34.2 | 33.1 | 32.3 | 34.0 | 34.2 | 34.6 |
| Operating Income | 16.2 | 15.9 | 19.8 | 17.9 | 18.0 | 21.6 | 23.6 | 23.1 |
| Income Tax | 3.2 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 5.5 |
| Net Income | 13.1 | 12.9 | 15.0 | 14.3 | 14.2 | 17.7 | 19.4 | 18.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DECK: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.