Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 241 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| DLX | $1.2B | 14.8× | 7.0× | 0.6× | 0.5% | 53.0% | 3.8% | 12.1% | 3.9% | 3.8× | 241 |
Peers = companies sharing DLX's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $26.62 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.2%/yr for a decade (off $124M normalized FCF).
The market's 8.2% is more conservative than its 2-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt $1.4B
mean 38.8% · volatility σ 52% · implied rate exceeded in 1/2 yrs
Central path = implied 8.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (52%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 31% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $55M dividends + $0 buybacks = $55M returned on $175M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · 0%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $37M is below the $87M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2023-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~8.6% on $1.4B of debt.
Cash of $37M fully covers short-term debt of $16M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.13B 100.0% | $2.12B 100.0% | $2.19B 100.0% | $2.24B 100.0% | $2.02B 100.0% | $1.79B 100.0% | $2.01B 100.0% | $2.00B 100.0% | $1.97B 100.0% | $1.85B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.00B 47.0% | $995.3M 46.9% | $1.03B 47.0% | $1.03B 46.1% | $884.3M 43.7% | $730.8M 40.8% | $812.9M 40.5% | $791.7M 39.6% | $742.7M 37.8% | $667.8M 36.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $529.1M 26.9% | $534.4M 28.9% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $213.0M 10.8% | $132.9M 7.2% |
| Gross Profit | — | $1.13B 53.1% | $1.16B 53.0% | $1.21B 53.9% | $1.14B 56.3% | $1.06B 59.2% | $1.20B 59.5% | $1.21B 60.4% | $1.22B 62.2% | $1.18B 63.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $873.3M 40.9% | $909.2M 42.9% | $956.1M 43.6% | $993.3M 44.4% | $941.0M 46.5% | $839.8M 46.9% | $891.7M 44.4% | $854.0M 42.7% | $830.2M 42.2% | $807.2M 43.7% |
| Operating Income | $232.4M 10.9% | $192.2M 9.1% | $160.8M 7.3% | $169.4M 7.6% | $142.2M 7.0% | $40.7M 2.3% | -$188.3M -9.4% | $231.2M 11.6% | $329.2M 16.7% | $366.9M 19.8% |
| Interest Expense | $122.0M 5.7% | $123.3M 5.8% | $125.6M 5.7% | $94.5M 4.2% | $55.6M 2.7% | $23.1M 1.3% | $34.7M 1.7% | $27.1M 1.4% | $21.4M 1.1% | $22.3M 1.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $8.7M 0.4% | $7.6M 0.4% | $4.6M 0.2% | $9.4M 0.4% | $7.2M 0.4% | $9.2M 0.5% | $7.2M 0.4% | $8.5M 0.4% | $5.0M 0.3% | $3.7M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $119.1M 5.6% | $76.5M 3.6% | $39.8M 1.8% | $84.4M 3.8% | $93.8M 4.6% | $26.8M 1.5% | -$215.7M -10.7% | $212.6M 10.6% | $312.8M 15.9% | $340.4M 18.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $36.9M 1.7% | $23.6M 1.1% | $13.6M 0.6% | $18.8M 0.8% | $31.0M 1.5% | $21.5M 1.2% | $8.0M 0.4% | $63.0M 3.2% | $82.7M 4.2% | $111.0M 6.0% |
| Net Income | $82.1M 3.8% | $52.8M 2.5% | $26.1M 1.2% | $65.4M 2.9% | $62.6M 3.1% | $5.2M 0.3% | -$223.8M -11.1% | $149.6M 7.5% | $230.2M 11.7% | $229.4M 12.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.83 | $1.20 | $0.60 | $1.52 | $1.48 | $0.12 | $-5.20 | $3.18 | $4.75 | $4.68 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.80 | $1.18 | $0.59 | $1.50 | $1.45 | $0.11 | $-5.20 | $3.16 | $4.72 | $4.65 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 44.8M | 44.1M | 43.5M | 43.0M | 42.4M | 41.9M | 43.0M | 46.8M | 48.1M | 48.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 45.5M | 44.7M | 43.8M | 43.3M | 42.8M | 42.1M | 43.0M | 47.0M | 48.4M | 49.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 56th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 38.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 39.6 | 40.5 | 40.8 | 43.7 | 46.1 | 47.0 | 46.9 | 47.0 |
| Gross Profit | 60.4 | 59.5 | 59.2 | 56.3 | 53.9 | 53.0 | 53.1 | — |
| SG&A | 42.7 | 44.4 | 46.9 | 46.5 | 44.4 | 43.6 | 42.9 | 40.9 |
| Operating Income | 11.6 | -9.4 | 2.3 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 9.1 | 10.9 |
| Income Tax | 3.2 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.7 |
| Net Income | 7.5 | -11.1 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 3.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DLX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.