Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -19.58% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $318.9M 100.0% | $317.0M 100.0% | $319.0M 100.0% | $308.6M 100.0% | $258.0M 100.0% | $210.2M 100.0% | $173.4M 100.0% | $142.5M 100.0% | $108.5M 100.0% | $74.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $79.7M 25.0% | $81.0M 25.5% | $75.5M 23.7% | $73.1M 23.7% | $67.1M 26.0% | $56.7M 27.0% | $55.9M 32.3% | $49.6M 34.8% | $44.9M 41.4% | $33.2M 44.5% |
| Gross Profit | $239.1M 75.0% | $236.1M 74.5% | $243.5M 76.3% | $235.6M 76.3% | $190.8M 74.0% | $153.4M 73.0% | $117.5M 67.7% | $92.9M 65.2% | $63.6M 58.6% | $41.3M 55.5% |
| Research & Development | $77.2M 24.2% | $87.9M 27.7% | $85.0M 26.7% | $95.1M 30.8% | $81.0M 31.4% | $66.5M 31.6% | $69.2M 39.9% | $75.7M 53.2% | $78.3M 72.1% | $76.2M 102.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $59.2M 18.6% | $55.9M 17.6% | $49.4M 15.5% | $56.0M 18.2% | $54.5M 21.1% | $42.7M 20.3% | $35.9M 20.7% | $30.2M 21.2% | $29.3M 27.0% | $29.1M 39.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $278.2M 87.3% | $295.3M 93.2% | $298.4M 93.5% | $324.4M 105.1% | $279.3M 108.3% | $226.5M 107.8% | $232.7M 134.2% | $237.0M 166.4% | $239.4M 220.6% | $224.2M 300.8% |
| Operating Income | -$39.1M -12.3% | -$59.3M -18.7% | -$54.9M -17.2% | -$88.9M -28.8% | -$88.5M -34.3% | -$73.1M -34.8% | -$115.3M -66.5% | -$144.1M -101.1% | -$175.8M -162.0% | -$182.9M -245.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$18.5M -5.8% | -$21.4M -6.8% | -$19.4M -6.1% | -$15.5M -5.0% | -$14.1M -5.5% | -$11.1M -5.3% | -$9.6M -5.6% | -$9.0M -6.3% | -$396K -0.4% | $513K 0.7% |
| Pretax Income | -$57.6M -18.1% | -$80.7M -25.5% | -$74.3M -23.3% | -$104.4M -33.8% | -$102.6M -39.8% | -$84.2M -40.1% | -$124.9M -72.0% | -$153.1M -107.4% | -$176.2M -162.3% | -$182.3M -244.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $1.8M 0.6% | $1.2M 0.4% | $1.3M 0.4% | $1.2M 0.4% | -$461K -0.2% | $409K 0.2% | $754K 0.4% | $1.2M 0.9% | $385K 0.4% | $773K 1.0% |
| Net Income | -$59.3M -18.6% | -$81.9M -25.8% | -$75.6M -23.7% | -$105.6M -34.2% | -$102.1M -39.6% | -$84.6M -40.3% | -$125.7M -72.5% | -$154.3M -108.3% | -$176.6M -162.7% | -$183.1M -245.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.45 | $-2.13 | $-2.10 | $-3.10 | $-3.19 | $-2.89 | $-4.57 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.45 | $-2.13 | $-2.10 | $-3.10 | $-3.19 | $-2.89 | $-4.57 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 41.0M | 38.5M | 36.0M | 34.1M | 32.0M | 29.3M | 27.5M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 41.0M | 38.5M | 36.0M | 34.1M | 32.0M | 29.3M | 27.5M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 100%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $43M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
Nothing notable to watch.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 34.8 | 32.3 | 27.0 | 26.0 | 23.7 | 23.7 | 25.5 | 25.0 |
| Gross Profit | 65.2 | 67.7 | 73.0 | 74.0 | 76.3 | 76.3 | 74.5 | 75.0 |
| R&D | 53.2 | 39.9 | 31.6 | 31.4 | 30.8 | 26.7 | 27.7 | 24.2 |
| SG&A | 21.2 | 20.7 | 20.3 | 21.1 | 18.2 | 15.5 | 17.6 | 18.6 |
| Operating Income | -101.1 | -66.5 | -34.8 | -34.3 | -28.8 | -17.2 | -18.7 | -12.3 |
| Income Tax | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Net Income | -108.3 | -72.5 | -40.3 | -39.6 | -34.2 | -23.7 | -25.8 | -18.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DOMO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.84T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.13T | 43.0× | 38.5× | 23.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.92T | 44.6× | 34.4× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.75T | 28.2× | 19.9× | 11.3× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.63T | 72.3× | 64.6× | 25.6× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 121.7× | 57.4× | 27.7× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $804.3B | 186.2× | 190.3× | 23.2× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $485.4B | — | 60.6× | 9.2× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $435.8B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $414.4B | 275.1× | 286.8× | 92.6× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $348.4B | 61.5× | 33.0× | 3.1× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $347.0B | 65.9× | 55.4× | 18.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $336.4B | 49.0× | 38.7× | 11.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $316.6B | — | — | 1023.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $275.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $268.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $254.3B | 281.2× | 218.9× | 51.7× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $249.8B | 233.7× | 156.0× | 27.1× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| CRM | $241.0B | 33.3× | 26.0× | 5.8× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| TXN | $239.4B | 48.3× | 31.5× | 13.5× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $236.0B | 68.3× | 59.6× | 26.2× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| IBM | $233.4B | 22.3× | — | 3.5× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $226.6B | — | — | 30.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $193.5B | 36.0× | 14.5× | 4.4× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $185.4B | 71.3× | 121.2× | 22.6× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| DOMO | $184M | — | — | 0.6× | 0.6% | 75.0% | -18.6% | 31.9% | 99.6% | -4.3× | 125 |
Peers = companies sharing DOMO's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.