Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Ranked against 14 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DHI | $41.0B | 12.7× | 8.4× | 1.2× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | -0.7× | 322 |
| PHM | $23.7B | 11.2× | 7.0× | 1.4× | -3.5% | — | 12.8% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -0.6× | 264 |
| NVR | $16.0B | 13.8× | — | 1.6× | -1.9% | — | 13.0% | 34.7% | 34.7% | — | 154 |
| TOL | $13.3B | 10.7× | 6.7× | 1.2× | 1.1% | 25.1% | 12.3% | 16.3% | 16.3% | -0.7× | 190 |
| TMHC | $6.7B | 9.3× | — | 0.8× | -0.6% | 23.0% | 9.6% | 12.4% | 9.1% | — | 1 |
| ECG | $5.5B | 27.4× | 19.8× | 1.5× | 31.5% | 12.1% | 5.4% | 32.0% | 22.1% | 1.0× | 118 |
| MHO | $3.2B | 8.7× | 6.2× | 0.7× | -1.9% | 23.0% | 9.1% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 0.0× | 65 |
| KBH | $2.9B | 7.8× | — | 0.5× | -10.0% | — | 6.9% | 11.0% | 11.0% | — | 66 |
| GRBK | $2.7B | 8.8× | 6.9× | 1.3× | -1.0% | 31.4% | 15.4% | 16.8% | 14.4% | 0.4× | 76 |
| CCS | $1.5B | 11.0× | 6.0× | 0.4× | -6.4% | — | 3.6% | 5.7% | 5.7% | -0.5× | 55 |
| LGIH | $1.0B | 14.0× | 31.8× | 0.6× | -22.6% | 20.7% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 1.9% | 19.7× | 49 |
| DFH | $909M | 4.7× | — | 0.2× | -2.9% | — | 5.0% | 15.2% | 7.2% | — | 36 |
| BZH | $893M | 22.0× | — | 0.4× | 1.8% | 14.2% | 1.9% | 3.7% | 2.0% | — | 32 |
| HOV | $611M | 13.8× | — | 0.2× | -0.9% | — | 2.1% | 7.7% | 3.7% | — | 21 |
| DREM | $1M | 1.2× | 0.2× | 0.1× | 102% | 20.9% | 4.2% | 30.2% | 30.2% | -0.8× | — |
Peers = companies sharing DREM's sector (Operative Builders) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $3.9M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 30%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
Average free cash flow across the last 1 positive fiscal year (FY2025). Smooths the cycle. Stock compensation is NOT charged — it is added back inside operating cash flow.
The answer is outside the range this solves over (-60% to +100%/yr), so it is reported as off the scale rather than as a rate. The price is below what this cash flow is worth even under collapse.
On the basis ($3.9M) the requirement is off the scale. Shares issued to employees are added back in operating cash flow, so this basis treats them as free.
Default is 9.0% — this company's computed cost of capital, the same rate the Analysis tab discounts at.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares (market data) · net debt -$899K
Today's price is outside this grid at every discount rate shown — the assumptions it requires lie beyond the plotted range, which is itself the finding.
mean 161.5% · volatility σ 498% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (498%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.1M 100.0% | $5.0M 100.0% | $5.7M 100.0% | $6.3M 100.0% | $3.9M 100.0% | $3.0M 100.0% | $3.1M 100.0% | $2.6M 100.0% | $3.0M 100.0% | $568K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $8.0M 79.1% | $2.7M 54.5% | $4.6M 80.8% | $5.2M 82.9% | $3.1M 80.0% | $2.2M 72.1% | $2.1M 67.4% | $1.5M 58.5% | $1.9M 65.6% | $415K 73.0% |
| Gross Profit | $2.1M 20.9% | $2.3M 45.5% | $1.1M 19.2% | $1.1M 17.1% | $778K 20.0% | $842K 27.9% | $1.0M 32.6% | $1.1M 41.5% | $1.0M 34.4% | $153K 27.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $974K 9.7% | $760K 15.3% | $1.0M 17.9% | $872K 13.8% | $819K 21.1% | $1.0M 34.3% | $990K 31.9% | $1.0M 40.4% | $1.0M 34.9% | $105K 18.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $998K 9.9% | $763K 15.3% | $1.0M 18.0% | $874K 13.9% | $825K 21.2% | $1.0M 34.5% | $996K 32.1% | $1.0M 40.6% | $1.0M 35.0% | $156K 27.4% |
| Operating Income | $1.1M 11.0% | $1.5M 30.2% | $69K 1.2% | $206K 3.3% | -$48K -1.2% | -$199K -6.6% | $16K 0.5% | $23K 0.9% | -$19K -0.7% | -$3K -0.5% |
| Interest Expense | $89K 0.9% | $82K 1.7% | $166K 2.9% | $103K 1.6% | $123K 3.2% | $25K 0.8% | $8K 0.3% | — | — | $8K 1.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$268K -2.7% | -$280K -5.6% | -$166K -2.9% | -$51K -0.8% | -$123K -3.2% | -$25K -0.8% | $2K 0.1% | — | — | -$9K -1.6% |
| Pretax Income | $837K 8.3% | $1.2M 24.5% | -$97K -1.7% | $154K 2.4% | -$170K -4.4% | -$224K -7.4% | $17K 0.6% | $23K 0.9% | -$19K -0.7% | -$12K -2.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $88K 0.9% | $237K 4.8% | — | — | — | — | $32K 1.0% | $22K 0.8% | $7K 0.2% | — |
| Net Income | $418K 4.2% | $376K 7.6% | -$97K -1.7% | $154K 2.4% | -$170K -4.4% | -$224K -7.4% | -$14K -0.5% | $2K 0.1% | -$19K -0.7% | -$12K -2.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 48.4M | 47.1M | 39.2M | 35.8M | 34.5M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 48.4M | 47.1M | 39.2M | 35.8M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 14th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 30% against ROIC 30% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is 22.2% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 58.5 | 67.4 | 72.1 | 80.0 | 82.9 | 80.8 | 54.5 | 79.1 |
| Gross Profit | 41.5 | 32.6 | 27.9 | 20.0 | 17.1 | 19.2 | 45.5 | 20.9 |
| SG&A | 40.4 | 31.9 | 34.3 | 21.1 | 13.8 | 17.9 | 15.3 | 9.7 |
| Operating Income | 0.9 | 0.5 | -6.6 | -1.2 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 30.2 | 11.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.8 | 1.0 | — | — | — | — | 4.8 | 0.9 |
| Net Income | 0.1 | -0.5 | -7.4 | -4.4 | 2.4 | -1.7 | 7.6 | 4.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DREM: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Earns 89.08pts above its cost of capital, without much margin of safety.
| Period | ROIC | Cost of capital | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2019 | 4.1% | 9.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | -5.0pts |
| FY2020 | -35.0% | 9.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | -44.0pts |
| FY2021 | -10.9% | 6.5% | -17.4pts |
| FY2022 | 72.9% | 7.9% | 65.0pts |
| FY2024 | 89.1% | 8.6% | 80.5pts |
| FY2025 | 136.4% | 8.2% | 128.2pts |
| Now | 30.2% | 9.1% | 21.1pts |
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2016 | 27.0% | -0.5% | -2.1% |
| FY2017 | 34.4% | -0.7% | -0.7% |
| FY2018 | 41.5% | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| FY2019 | 32.6% | 0.5% | -0.5% |
| FY2020 | 27.9% | -6.6% | -7.4% |
| FY2021 | 20.0% | -1.2% | -4.4% |
| FY2022 | 17.1% | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| FY2023 | 19.2% | 1.2% | -1.7% |
| FY2024 | 45.5% | 30.2% | 7.6% |
| FY2025 | 20.9% | 11.0% | 4.2% |
Return on equity (30%) and return on invested capital (30%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
The spread was positive in only 3 of the last 5 years.
Converts 3.71x of reported profit into cash — adequate, without much margin.
The cash conversion cycle has lengthened +234 days over 3 years to 201 — that many more days of the company's own cash funding the same volume of business.
No debt, so there is no leverage path to distress.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
No growth rate within the range this model can express reaches the current price, so the requirement cannot be stated as a number.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: implied_growth.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $418,271 | $418,271 |
| Share-based comp | $25,300 | $443,571 |
| Other non-cash & working capital | $4M | $4M |
| Operating cash flow | $4M | $4M |
| Capex | $0 | $4M |
| Free cash flow | $4M | $4M |
| FCF after SBC | $4M | $4M |
| Fiscal year | Revenue growth | Receivables growth | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | -2.9% | -76.5% | -73.6 points |
| FY2021 | 28.9% | 270.4% | 241.5 points |
| FY2022 | 62.4% | -40.4% | -102.8 points |
| FY2023 | -10.4% | -4.9% | 5.4 points |
| FY2024 | -12.1% | -29.6% | -17.5 points |
| FY2025 | 102.5% | 5.1% | -97.4 points |
| Fiscal year | DSO | DIO | DPO | Cash conversion cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2019 | 48.3 days | not reported | 128.9 days | -80.6 days |
| FY2020 | 11.7 days | not reported | 39.5 days | -27.8 days |
| FY2021 | 33.6 days | not reported | 40.3 days | -6.7 days |
| FY2022 | 12.3 days | not reported | 45 days | -32.7 days |
| FY2023 | 13.1 days | 4.2 days | 43 days | -25.7 days |
| FY2024 | 10.5 days | 992.1 days | 149.8 days | 852.8 days |
| FY2025 | 5.4 days | 225 days | 29.4 days | 201.1 days |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | -14.3 percent |
| FY2020 | -14.2 percent |
| FY2021 | -1.6 percent |
| FY2022 | -6.2 percent |
| FY2023 | -5.2 percent |
| FY2024 | 10.0 percent |
| FY2025 | -48.8 percent |
Below the line, the asset base is being consumed faster than it is replaced.
Below the line for 2 consecutive years to the latest.
Depreciation here includes amortisation of acquired intangibles — goodwill written down over time, customer lists, acquired technology. Capex does not replace those and is not meant to, so an acquisitive or asset-light company sits below 1.0 permanently and correctly. The signal is cleanest for capital-intensive businesses, where the two measure the same physical base. For that reason this informs the earnings-quality verdict but never caps it.
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.