Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +14.43% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| DUOT | $183M | — | — | 6.8× | 271% | 29.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 69 |
Peers = companies sharing DUOT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $27.0M 100.0% | $7.3M 100.0% | $7.5M 100.0% | $15.0M 100.0% | $8.3M 100.0% | $8.0M 100.0% | $13.6M 100.0% | $12.0M 100.0% | $3.9M 100.0% | $6.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $19.1M 70.8% | $6.8M 93.6% | $6.2M 82.5% | $10.3M 68.4% | $6.2M 75.3% | $7.8M 97.1% | $7.2M 52.5% | $6.8M 56.8% | $2.3M 59.1% | $2.7M 44.8% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $348K 9.0% | $366K 6.0% |
| Gross Profit | $7.9M 29.2% | $469K 6.4% | $1.3M 17.5% | $4.7M 31.6% | $2.0M 24.7% | $236K 2.9% | $6.5M 47.5% | $5.2M 43.2% | $1.6M 40.9% | $3.4M 55.2% |
| Research & Development | $847K 3.1% | $1.5M 21.0% | $1.8M 24.3% | $1.7M 11.0% | $2.5M 30.5% | $102K 1.3% | $1.5M 10.8% | $489K 4.1% | $310K 8.0% | $272K 4.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $15.6M 57.6% | $7.8M 106.9% | $9.4M 126.5% | $8.6M 57.5% | $5.7M 69.6% | — | $2.2M 16.2% | $1.5M 12.0% | $1.1M 27.1% | $890K 14.6% |
| Operating Income | -$9.8M -36.1% | -$11.0M -150.9% | -$11.4M -153.2% | -$6.9M -45.7% | -$7.5M -90.3% | -$6.6M -82.5% | -$2.4M -17.6% | -$1.6M -13.0% | -$3.4M -88.6% | -$1.7M -28.6% |
| Interest Expense | $439K 1.6% | $286K 3.9% | $7K 0.1% | $9K 0.1% | $20K 0.2% | $150K 1.9% | $69K 0.5% | $17K 0.1% | $4.5M 116.3% | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $447K 1.7% | $37K 0.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$72K -0.3% | $219K 3.0% | $205K 2.7% | $366 0.0% | $1.4M 17.5% | -$113K -1.4% | -$64K -0.5% | -$11K -0.1% | -$1.7M -44.0% | -$818K -13.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | — | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | $10K 0.0% | $11K 0.1% | -$11.2M -150.5% | -$6.9M -45.7% | -$6.0M -72.7% | -$6.7M -83.9% | -$2.5M -18.1% | -$1.6M -13.1% | -$5.2M -132.6% | -$2.6M -42.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.64 | $-1.39 | $-1.56 | $-1.11 | $-1.63 | — | — | $-0.08 | $-1.43 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.64 | $-1.39 | $-1.56 | $-1.11 | $-1.63 | — | — | $-0.08 | $-1.43 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 15.3M | 7.7M | 7.2M | 6.2M | 3.7M | — | — | 20.8M | 3.6M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 15.3M | 7.7M | 7.2M | 6.2M | 3.7M | — | — | 20.8M | 3.6M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$37M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 39th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.8 | 52.5 | 97.1 | 75.3 | 68.4 | 82.5 | 93.6 | 70.8 |
| Gross Profit | 43.2 | 47.5 | 2.9 | 24.7 | 31.6 | 17.5 | 6.4 | 29.2 |
| R&D | 4.1 | 10.8 | 1.3 | 30.5 | 11.0 | 24.3 | 21.0 | 3.1 |
| SG&A | 12.0 | 16.2 | — | 69.6 | 57.5 | 126.5 | 106.9 | 57.6 |
| Operating Income | -13.0 | -17.6 | -82.5 | -90.3 | -45.7 | -153.2 | -150.9 | -36.1 |
| Income Tax | — | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | -13.1 | -18.1 | -83.9 | -72.7 | -45.7 | -150.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DUOT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.