Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 998 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $209.70 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 10.0%/yr for a decade (off $2.1B normalized FCF).
The market's 10.0% is more optimistic than its 7-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.25B shares · net debt -$2.9B
mean 9.8% · volatility σ 27% · implied rate exceeded in 3/7 yrs
Central path = implied 10.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (27%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 8% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $191M dividends + $769M buybacks = $960M returned on $2.3B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 13%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04 · 43d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.53B 100.0% | $7.46B 100.0% | $7.56B 100.0% | $7.43B 100.0% | $6.99B 100.0% | $5.63B 100.0% | $5.54B 100.0% | $4.95B 100.0% | $5.15B 100.0% | $4.84B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.58B 21.0% | $1.54B 20.7% | $1.71B 22.6% | $1.79B 24.1% | $1.86B 26.6% | $1.49B 26.5% | $1.37B 24.7% | $1.32B 26.7% | $1.28B 24.8% | $1.30B 26.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $822.0M 16.0% | $893.0M 18.4% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $455.0M 8.8% | $405.0M 8.4% |
| Gross Profit | $5.95B 79.0% | $5.92B 79.3% | $5.85B 77.4% | $5.63B 75.9% | $5.13B 73.4% | $4.13B 73.5% | $4.17B 75.3% | $3.63B 73.3% | $3.87B 75.2% | $3.55B 73.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $763.0M 10.1% | $745.0M 10.0% | $691.0M 9.1% | $727.0M 9.8% | $673.0M 9.6% | $592.0M 10.5% | $506.0M 9.1% | $460.0M 9.3% | $469.0M 9.1% | $439.0M 9.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $4.79B 63.5% | $4.40B 59.0% | $4.33B 57.3% | $4.30B 57.9% | $4.00B 57.3% | $3.09B 54.9% | $2.72B 49.2% | $2.63B 53.2% | $2.44B 47.4% | $2.32B 47.9% |
| Operating Income | $1.16B 15.4% | $1.52B 20.4% | $1.52B 20.1% | $1.33B 17.9% | $1.13B 16.1% | $1.05B 18.6% | $1.45B 26.1% | $996.0M 20.1% | $1.43B 27.8% | $1.22B 25.3% |
| Interest Expense | $53.0M 0.7% | $58.0M 0.8% | $58.0M 0.8% | $58.0M 0.8% | $58.0M 0.8% | $45.0M 0.8% | $44.0M 0.8% | $45.0M 0.9% | $44.0M 0.9% | $47.0M 1.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $18.0M 0.2% | $85.0M 1.1% | $71.0M 0.9% | -$6.0M -0.1% | -$48.0M -0.7% | -$29.0M -0.5% | $63.0M 1.1% | $83.0M 1.7% | $15.0M 0.3% | -$14.0M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $1.18B 15.7% | $1.60B 21.5% | $1.59B 21.0% | $1.33B 17.9% | $1.08B 15.5% | $1.02B 18.1% | $1.51B 27.2% | $1.08B 21.8% | $1.45B 28.1% | $1.21B 25.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $293.0M 3.9% | $484.0M 6.5% | $316.0M 4.2% | $524.0M 7.1% | $292.0M 4.2% | $180.0M 3.2% | -$1.53B -27.7% | $60.0M 1.2% | $406.0M 7.9% | $243.0M 5.0% |
| Net Income | $887.0M 11.8% | $1.12B 15.0% | $1.27B 16.8% | $802.0M 10.8% | $789.0M 11.3% | $837.0M 14.9% | $3.04B 54.9% | $1.02B 20.6% | $1.04B 20.3% | $967.0M 20.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.55 | $4.28 | $4.71 | $2.90 | $2.78 | $2.90 | $10.37 | $3.36 | $3.39 | $3.19 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.51 | $4.25 | $4.68 | $2.88 | $2.76 | $2.87 | $10.30 | $3.33 | $3.34 | $3.08 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 250.0M | 262.0M | 270.0M | 277.0M | 284.0M | 289.0M | 293.0M | 303.0M | 308.0M | 303.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 253.0M | 264.0M | 272.0M | 278.0M | 286.0M | 292.0M | 295.0M | 306.0M | 312.0M | 314.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.18T | 32.0× | 27.9× | 10.4× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.68T | 28.3× | 16.7× | 8.3× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.41T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $351.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $339.1B | 31.8× | 25.2× | 7.5× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $216.8B | 12.6× | 4.4× | 1.6× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $206.3B | 15.8× | 10.6× | 2.2× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $202.5B | 18.8× | 8.9× | 2.3× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $190.1B | 8.7× | 7.0× | 1.5× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $86.9B | 95.6× | 56.1× | 6.3× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $69.7B | 96.9× | 15.2× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| TTWO | $41.3B | — | 448.6× | 6.2× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $40.4B | — | 25.5× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TWLO | $35.3B | 1104.2× | 100.9× | 7.0× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $30.3B | 62.0× | 64.0× | 13.7× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $28.2B | 12.4× | — | 1.7× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $25.4B | — | 58.9× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $23.3B | 266.9× | 542.6× | 4.9× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.9B | — | 40.1× | 4.9× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| CHTR | $19.4B | 4.0× | 5.4× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| NWS | $19.2B | 16.4× | — | 2.3× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| TKO | $15.7B | 85.7× | 14.1× | 3.3× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
Peers = companies sharing EA's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 15-yr range · 92th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 15-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 26.7 | 24.7 | 26.5 | 26.6 | 24.1 | 22.6 | 20.7 | 21.0 |
| Gross Profit | 73.3 | 75.3 | 73.5 | 73.4 | 75.9 | 77.4 | 79.3 | 79.0 |
| SG&A | 9.3 | 9.1 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 9.8 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Operating Income | 20.1 | 26.1 | 18.6 | 16.1 | 17.9 | 20.1 | 20.4 | 15.4 |
| Income Tax | 1.2 | -27.7 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 7.1 | 4.2 | 6.5 | 3.9 |
| Net Income | 20.6 | 54.9 | 14.9 | 11.3 | 10.8 | 16.8 | 15.0 | 11.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on EA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.