Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 345 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| EEFT | $3.1B | 10.9× | 6.1× | 0.7× | 6.4% | — | 7.3% | 23.7% | 9.3% | 3.0× | 345 |
Peers = companies sharing EEFT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.0B covers the $6M due within a year 170.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2019-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.2% on $2.0B of debt.
Cash of $1.0B fully covers short-term debt of $983M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $74.27 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -5.7%/yr for a decade (off $533M normalized FCF).
The market's -5.7% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt $981M
mean 17.8% · volatility σ 59% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied -5.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (59%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $434M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.24B 100.0% | $3.99B 100.0% | $3.69B 100.0% | $3.36B 100.0% | $3.00B 100.0% | $2.48B 100.0% | $2.75B 100.0% | $2.54B 100.0% | $2.25B 100.0% | $1.96B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | $1.58B 63.5% | $1.56B 56.6% | $1.49B 58.7% | $1.36B 60.2% | $1.17B 60.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $372.2M 8.8% | $315.3M 7.9% | $296.8M 8.0% | $285.1M 8.5% | $252.0M 8.4% | $221.6M 8.9% | $211.9M 7.7% | $216.8M 8.5% | $190.3M 8.4% | $165.3M 8.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $3.71B 87.5% | $3.49B 87.4% | $3.26B 88.3% | $2.97B 88.5% | $2.81B 93.9% | $2.44B 98.1% | $2.27B 82.7% | $2.18B 85.9% | $1.99B 88.2% | $1.71B 87.2% |
| Operating Income | $529.8M 12.5% | $503.2M 12.6% | $432.6M 11.7% | $385.4M 11.5% | $184.0M 6.1% | $46.6M 1.9% | $475.2M 17.3% | $357.9M 14.1% | $266.0M 11.8% | $249.8M 12.8% |
| Interest Expense | $84.5M 2.0% | $80.5M 2.0% | $55.6M 1.5% | $37.5M 1.1% | $38.3M 1.3% | $36.6M 1.5% | $36.2M 1.3% | $37.6M 1.5% | $32.6M 1.4% | $28.3M 1.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $23.2M 0.5% | $23.8M 0.6% | $15.2M 0.4% | $2.0M 0.1% | $700K 0.0% | $1.0M 0.0% | $2.0M 0.1% | $1.3M 0.1% | $2.4M 0.1% | $1.7M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$81.6M -1.9% | -$54.3M -1.4% | -$32.2M -0.9% | -$62.8M -1.9% | -$48.4M -1.6% | -$38.5M -1.5% | -$41.4M -1.5% | -$63.0M -2.5% | -$9.7M -0.4% | -$16.9M -0.9% |
| Pretax Income | $448.2M 10.6% | $448.9M 11.3% | $400.4M 10.9% | $322.6M 9.6% | $135.6M 4.5% | $8.2M 0.3% | $433.8M 15.8% | $294.9M 11.6% | $256.3M 11.4% | $232.9M 11.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $135.2M 3.2% | $142.6M 3.6% | $120.9M 3.3% | $91.9M 2.7% | $65.1M 2.2% | $11.5M 0.5% | $87.1M 3.2% | $62.8M 2.5% | $99.4M 4.4% | $58.8M 3.0% |
| Net Income | $309.5M 7.3% | $306 0.0% | $280 0.0% | $231 0.0% | $71 0.0% | -$3.4M -0.1% | $346.7M 12.6% | $232.9M 9.2% | $156.8M 7.0% | $174.4M 8.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $7.40 | $6.82 | $5.77 | $4.60 | $1.34 | $-0.06 | $6.49 | $4.52 | $2.99 | $3.34 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.84 | $6.45 | $5.50 | $4.41 | $1.32 | $-0.06 | $6.31 | $4.26 | $2.85 | $3.23 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 41.8M | 44.9M | 48.5M | 50.2M | 52.6M | 52.7M | 53.4M | 51.5M | 52.5M | 52.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 45.8M | 48.1M | 51.6M | 53.5M | 53.5M | 52.7M | 54.9M | 54.6M | 55.1M | 54.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 2th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 58.7 | 56.6 | 63.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 8.5 | 7.7 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Operating Income | 14.1 | 17.3 | 1.9 | 6.1 | 11.5 | 11.7 | 12.6 | 12.5 |
| Income Tax | 2.5 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Net Income | 9.2 | 12.6 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on EEFT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.