Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q2 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 12 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow on any basis, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $2.0M buybacks = $2.0M returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 2 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -66%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 2 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-16
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -96% against ROIC -66% — -30% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 86.3 | 81.5 |
| Gross Profit | 13.7 | 18.5 |
| R&D | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| SG&A | 50.6 | 34.8 |
| Operating Income | -37.9 | -17.1 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | — |
| Net Income | -40.9 | -19.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ELWT: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $6.2M covers all $2.0M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $6.2M fully covers short-term debt of $1.0M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-16
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.6M 100.0% | $8.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $17.6M 81.5% | $7.3M 86.3% |
| Gross Profit | $4.0M 18.5% | $1.2M 13.7% |
| Research & Development | $19K 0.1% | $1K 0.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $7.5M 34.8% | $4.3M 50.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $7.7M 35.7% | $4.4M 51.6% |
| Operating Income | -$3.7M -17.1% | -$3.2M -37.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$522K -2.4% | -$255K -3.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$4.2M -19.6% | -$3.5M -40.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | — | $1K 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$4.2M -19.6% | -$3.5M -40.9% |
| Per Share | ||
| EPS (Basic) | -$0.80 | -$0.98 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -$0.80 | -$0.98 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 5.3M | 3.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 5.3M | 3.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 37 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-06-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCZ | $243.0B | 12.2× | 9.0× | 2.0× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 10.2% | 2.4× | 1 |
| VZ | $184.5B | 10.9× | 6.8× | 1.3× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 7.0% | 2.7× | 3,043 |
| TMUS | $168.4B | 16.2× | 7.8× | 1.9× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.5× | 1,605 |
| T | $161.0B | 7.7× | 6.4× | 1.3× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 2.8× | 2,601 |
| WBD | $77.6B | 106.7× | 16.5× | 2.1× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 4.4× | 1,284 |
| ROKU | $23.0B | 262.1× | — | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 759 |
| CHTR | $12.6B | 3.0× | 5.1× | 0.2× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 774 |
| GSAT | $10.7B | — | 115.3× | 39.4× | 9.0% | — | -3.2% | -2.4% | -1.0% | 0.4× | 314 |
| SIRI | $9.2B | 12.2× | 9.9× | 1.1× | -1.6% | 52.4% | 9.4% | 7.0% | 3.8% | 5.1× | 597 |
| VSAT | $8.5B | — | 5.9× | 1.8× | 2.7% | — | -0.7% | -0.7% | -0.7% | -1.5× | 480 |
| NXST | $5.1B | 54.9× | 8.4× | 1.0× | -8.5% | — | 2.2% | 5.3% | 1.3% | 4.6× | 473 |
| LUMN | $5.0B | — | 2.1× | 0.4× | -5.4% | 46.5% | -14.0% | 156% | 156% | -0.5× | 613 |
| IRDM | $4.8B | 42.4× | 14.4× | 5.5× | 4.9% | — | 13.1% | 24.7% | 5.1% | 3.7× | 472 |
| TDS | $3.9B | — | 15.3× | 3.2× | -5.3% | — | -0.5% | -0.1% | -0.1% | -3.7× | 340 |
| AD | $2.9B | 59.8× | — | 17.8× | 58.3% | 51.2% | 29.9% | 1.9% | 1.9% | — | 140 |
| LBTYA | $2.7B | — | — | 0.6× | 12.4% | 65.8% | -146% | -73.3% | -39.0% | — | — |
| ADEA | $2.4B | 22.0× | 15.5× | 5.4× | 17.9% | — | 25.1% | 23.1% | 12.4% | 1.9× | 290 |
| CALX | $2.3B | 143.0× | 56.8× | 2.3× | 20.3% | 56.8% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.1% | -3.7× | 274 |
| IDT | $2.0B | 27.3× | 15.1× | 1.7× | 2.1% | 36.2% | 6.2% | 24.9% | 24.9% | -1.9× | 195 |
| ZD | $2.0B | 50.8× | 5.6× | 1.4× | 3.5% | 85.8% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 1.8% | 0.7× | 258 |
| LILA | $1.6B | — | 9.4× | 0.4× | -0.1% | 78.0% | -13.8% | -110% | -6.6% | 7.8× | — |
| UNIT | $1.5B | 1.2× | 13.9× | 0.7× | 91.5% | — | 58.4% | 343% | 13.2% | 12.1× | 276 |
| NMAX | $1.2B | — | — | 6.3× | 10.7% | 39.3% | -52.6% | -93.8% | -93.8% | — | 232 |
| SBGI | $918M | — | 10.5× | 0.3× | -10.7% | — | -3.5% | -25.3% | -2.3% | 8.3× | 178 |
| EVC | $616M | — | — | 1.4× | 22.6% | 58.9% | -17.7% | -143% | -35.6% | — | 144 |
| ELWT | $37M | — | — | 1.7× | 154% | 18.5% | -19.6% | -95.7% | -65.9% | — | 11 |
Peers = companies sharing ELWT's sector (Communications Services, NEC) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 13.7% | -37.9% | -40.9% |
| FY2025 | 18.5% | -17.1% | -19.6% |
Return on equity is 30 points BELOW the return on invested capital, which means the equity base is carrying capital the operations are not earning on — usually cash, goodwill, or a recent raise.
ROE is on average equity; ROIC is NOPAT over average invested capital (debt plus equity less excess cash). The gap is not a single adjustment.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Debt is present but there is no positive EBITDA or no reported interest expense, so coverage cannot be measured.
Ladder as of 2025-12-31 (10-K); cash from the 2025-12-31 balance sheet; FCF from FY2025.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: ebitda, interest_expense.
No positive free cash flow to discount, so the price cannot be expressed as a growth requirement.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: free_cash_flow.