Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 240 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $18.22 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 34.8%/yr for a decade (off $16M normalized FCF).
The market's 34.8% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares · net debt $1.3B
mean 344.0% · volatility σ 1312% · implied rate exceeded in 1/7 yrs
Central path = implied 34.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (1312%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $4M buybacks = $4M returned on $20M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -43%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $36M is below the $39M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-09-28 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~2.7% on $1.3B of debt.
Cash of $36M fully covers short-term debt of $35M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.25B 100.0% | $2.11B 100.0% | $1.71B 100.0% | $1.56B 100.0% | $1.43B 100.0% | $1.12B 100.0% | $3.33B 100.0% | $2.19B 100.0% | $1.94B 100.0% | $3.19B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $902.8M 40.2% | $926.9M 44.0% | $716.4M 42.0% | $693.7M 44.4% | $648.5M 45.5% | $517.1M 46.1% | $1.93B 57.9% | $1.46B 66.7% | $1.27B 65.3% | $2.19B 68.8% |
| Gross Profit | $1.35B 59.8% | $1.18B 56.0% | $990.8M 58.0% | $869.4M 55.6% | $777.7M 54.5% | $603.6M 53.9% | $1.40B 42.1% | $729.4M 33.3% | $671.6M 34.7% | $992.4M 31.2% |
| Research & Development | $120.3M 5.4% | $91.3M 4.3% | $75.3M 4.4% | $60.8M 3.9% | $49.1M 3.4% | $34.3M 3.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.07B 47.6% | $1.03B 48.7% | $830.3M 48.6% | $772.9M 49.4% | $665.8M 46.7% | $515.5M 46.0% | $1.13B 34.0% | $548.8M 25.0% | $500.6M 25.8% | $696.8M 21.9% |
| Operating Income | -$1.12B -50.0% | -$775.7M -36.8% | -$65.7M -3.8% | -$71.2M -4.6% | -$62.8M -4.4% | -$66.2M -5.9% | $203.6M 6.1% | $151.5M 6.9% | $135.6M 7.0% | $236.8M 7.4% |
| Interest Expense | $34.8M 1.5% | $57.1M 2.7% | $19.7M 1.2% | $24.1M 1.5% | $29.1M 2.0% | $52.8M 4.7% | $119.5M 3.6% | $49.1M 2.2% | $40.1M 2.1% | $30.3M 1.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$367K -0.0% | $9.9M 0.5% | $25.7M 1.5% | $2.1M 0.1% | $0 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$1.16B -51.6% | -$822.9M -39.0% | -$67.1M -3.9% | -$2.1M -0.1% | -$121.8M -8.5% | -$119.0M -10.6% | $50.5M 1.5% | $92.4M 4.2% | $48.6M 2.5% | $206.5M 6.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $22.3M 1.0% | $4.5M 0.2% | -$13.3M -0.8% | $36.1M 2.3% | -$19.5M -1.4% | -$44.6M -4.0% | $31.6M 1.0% | -$29.5M -1.3% | $2.5M 0.1% | $51.8M 1.6% |
| Net Income | -$1.18B -52.7% | -$825.5M -39.2% | -$33.3M -1.9% | -$13.3M -0.9% | $71.7M 5.0% | $42.6M 3.8% | -$527.6M -15.9% | $140.2M 6.4% | $151.1M 7.8% | $128.1M 4.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-20.75 | $-14.93 | $-0.61 | $-0.25 | $1.40 | $0.93 | $-3.89 | $1.17 | $1.23 | $1.04 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-20.75 | $-14.93 | $-0.61 | $-0.25 | $1.40 | $0.93 | $-3.89 | $1.16 | $1.22 | $1.04 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 57.1M | 55.3M | 54.5M | 54.1M | 51.1M | 45.6M | 135.7M | 120.3M | 123.2M | 122.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 57.1M | 55.3M | 54.5M | 54.1M | 51.1M | 45.6M | 136.7M | 120.8M | 124.0M | 123.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $29.18T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $364.8B | 41.7× | 29.1× | 5.4× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $333.0B | 39.0× | — | 7.3× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $262.2B | 39.4× | 18.6× | 3.0× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $212.8B | 84.8× | 42.4× | 2.4× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $184.3B | 36.8× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $170.8B | 46.1× | 30.5× | 5.3× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $169.1B | 23.8× | 16.2× | 6.9× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $152.5B | 37.6× | — | 5.6× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $127.9B | 27.4× | 15.8× | 3.4× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $121.2B | 24.6× | 15.9× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $119.2B | 34.3× | 26.9× | 6.0× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $110.0B | 25.3× | — | 5.0× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $96.5B | 23.1× | 16.9× | 1.8× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $95.0B | 32.8× | 23.4× | 4.5× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| PWR | $93.0B | 91.5× | 46.1× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| HWM | $91.2B | 61.2× | 40.2× | 11.1× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $91.0B | 31.8× | 14.7× | 6.5× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| VRT | $90.8B | 69.6× | 43.0× | 8.9× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| JCI | $89.8B | 27.4× | — | 3.8× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| WM | $87.9B | 32.5× | 12.3× | 3.5× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $87.0B | 15.6× | 9.7× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| MMM | $85.9B | 27.0× | 16.6× | 3.4× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| EMR | $83.5B | 36.7× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $80.9B | 45.6× | 29.1× | 7.8× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| ENOV | $1.0B | — | 10.5× | 0.5× | 6.7% | 59.8% | -52.7% | -79.5% | -42.5% | 5.9× | 240 |
Peers = companies sharing ENOV's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 6.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 66.7 | 57.9 | 46.1 | 45.5 | 44.4 | 42.0 | 44.0 | 40.2 |
| Gross Profit | 33.3 | 42.1 | 53.9 | 54.5 | 55.6 | 58.0 | 56.0 | 59.8 |
| R&D | — | — | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 5.4 |
| SG&A | 25.0 | 34.0 | 46.0 | 46.7 | 49.4 | 48.6 | 48.7 | 47.6 |
| Operating Income | 6.9 | 6.1 | -5.9 | -4.4 | -4.6 | -3.8 | -36.8 | -50.0 |
| Income Tax | -1.3 | 1.0 | -4.0 | -1.4 | 2.3 | -0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Net Income | 6.4 | -15.9 | 3.8 | 5.0 | -0.9 | -1.9 | -39.2 | -52.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ENOV: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.