Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 855 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
No trend data available for this metric.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 243 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC | $673.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 154 |
| XOM | $633.7B | 22.6× | — | 1.9× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| CVX | $344.7B | 28.1× | — | 1.8× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| RYDAF | $253.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| TTE | $187.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $144.0B | 18.1× | — | 2.4× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| STOHF | $99.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| VLO | $93.4B | 40.0× | 17.9× | 0.8× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| CNQ | $93.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 709 |
| MPC | $90.8B | 22.5× | 7.8× | 0.7× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EIPAF | $84.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| PSX | $82.2B | 18.8× | — | 0.6× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 8.9% | — | 2,041 |
| SU | $75.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 724 |
| SLB | $74.6B | 21.2× | — | 2.1× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| EOG | $72.9B | 14.7× | 7.1× | 3.2× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| BKR | $61.2B | — | — | 2.2× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 10.1% | — | 1,095 |
| IMO | $60.7B | 19.3× | — | 1.3× | -8.6% | — | 6.9% | 14.7% | 12.7% | — | 394 |
| LNG | $56.0B | 10.6× | 7.4× | 2.8× | 27.2% | — | 34.0% | 85.8% | 22.1% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| TRGP | $55.8B | 30.6× | 15.1× | 3.3× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| OKE | $54.9B | 16.1× | 11.9× | 1.6× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| FANG | $53.0B | 32.5× | 10.7× | 3.5× | 35.8% | — | 10.3% | 4.2% | 3.0% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| CVE | $52.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 437 |
| WOPEF | $42.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| CCJ | $41.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 970 |
| EXE | $21.6B | 12.0× | 4.8× | 1.8× | 186% | — | 15.0% | 9.8% | 7.7% | 0.9× | 855 |
Peers = companies sharing EXE's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $616M covers the $389M due within a year 1.6× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.7% on $5.0B of debt.
Cash of $616M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $90.82 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 14.3%/yr for a decade (off $799M normalized FCF).
The market's 14.3% is more conservative than its 5-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.24B shares · net debt $4.4B
mean 7571.0% · volatility σ 13265% · implied rate exceeded in 1/3 yrs
Central path = implied 14.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (13265%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 42% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $765M dividends + $100M buybacks = $865M returned on $1.8B FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · -31%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.12B 100.0% | $4.24B 100.0% | $8.72B 100.0% | $11.74B 100.0% | — | $5.24B 100.0% | $8.53B 100.0% | $10.03B 100.0% | $10.04B 100.0% | $8.71B 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $181.0M 1.5% | $186.0M 4.4% | $127.0M 1.5% | $142.0M 1.2% | — | $267.0M 5.1% | $315.0M 3.7% | $335.0M 3.3% | $333.0M 3.3% | $322.0M 3.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $9.65B 79.6% | $5.04B 119.0% | $5.58B 64.0% | $7.96B 67.8% | — | $13.94B 266.1% | $8.56B 100.4% | $9.65B 96.2% | $10.18B 101.4% | $11.96B 137.4% |
| Operating Income | $2.47B 20.4% | -$803.0M -19.0% | $3.14B 36.0% | $3.78B 32.2% | — | -$8.70B -166.1% | -$31.0M -0.4% | $382.0M 3.8% | -$138.0M -1.4% | -$3.26B -37.4% |
| Interest Expense | $235.0M 1.9% | $123.0M 2.9% | $104.0M 1.2% | $160.0M 1.4% | — | $331.0M 6.3% | $651.0M 7.6% | $633.0M 6.3% | $601.0M 6.0% | $528.0M 6.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$189.0M -1.6% | -$38.0M -0.9% | -$25.0M -0.3% | -$129.0M -1.1% | — | -$1.07B -20.3% | -$608.0M -7.1% | -$164.0M -1.6% | -$362.0M -3.6% | -$424.0M -4.9% |
| Pretax Income | $2.28B 18.8% | -$841.0M -19.9% | $3.12B 35.7% | $3.65B 31.1% | — | -$9.77B -186.4% | -$639.0M -7.5% | $218.0M 2.2% | -$500.0M -5.0% | -$3.68B -42.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $463.0M 3.8% | -$127.0M -3.0% | $698.0M 8.0% | -$1.28B -10.9% | — | -$19.0M -0.4% | -$331.0M -3.9% | -$10.0M -0.1% | $2.0M 0.0% | -$190.0M -2.2% |
| Net Income | $1.82B 15.0% | -$714.0M -16.9% | $2.42B 27.7% | $4.94B 42.0% | $6.33B | -$9.73B -185.8% | -$308.0M -3.6% | $226.0M 2.3% | -$505.0M -5.0% | -$3.49B -40.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $7.67 | $-4.55 | $18.21 | $38.71 | — | $-998.26 | $-49.97 | $29.26 | $-139.32 | $-5.26 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $7.57 | $-4.55 | $16.92 | $33.36 | — | $-998.26 | $-49.97 | $29.26 | $-139.32 | $-5.26 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 237.3M | 157.0M | 132.8M | 125.8M | — | 9.8M | 8.3M | 4.5M | 4.5M | 764.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 240.4M | 157.0M | 143.0M | 146.0M | — | 9.8M | 8.3M | 4.5M | 4.5M | 764.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 62th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 3.3 | 3.7 | 5.1 | — | 1.2 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 1.5 |
| Operating Income | 3.8 | -0.4 | -166.1 | — | 32.2 | 36.0 | -19.0 | 20.4 |
| Income Tax | -0.1 | -3.9 | -0.4 | — | -10.9 | 8.0 | -3.0 | 3.8 |
| Net Income | 2.3 | -3.6 | -185.8 | — | 42.0 | 27.7 | -16.9 | 15.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on EXE: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.