Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 1,199 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $50.99 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -8.2%/yr for a decade (off $4.4B normalized FCF).
The market's -8.2% is more conservative than its 7-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.55B shares · net debt $441M
mean 23.9% · volatility σ 33% · implied rate exceeded in 5/7 yrs
Central path = implied -8.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (33%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $4.3B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 13%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $798M is below the $1.2B due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~123.6% on $1.2B of debt.
Cash of $798M is below short-term debt of $1.2B — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.19B 100.0% | $20.46B 100.0% | $19.09B 100.0% | $17.74B 100.0% | $16.23B 100.0% | $14.85B 100.0% | $10.19B 100.0% | $5.82B 100.0% | $5.70B 100.0% | $5.50B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $745.0M 12.8% | $733.0M 12.9% | $747.0M 13.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $745.0M 12.8% | $733.0M 12.9% | $747.0M 13.6% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.32B 39.9% | $2.29B 40.2% | $2.21B 40.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.88B 32.5% | $6.56B 32.1% | $6.58B 34.4% | $6.06B 34.2% | $5.81B 35.8% | $5.65B 38.1% | $3.28B 32.2% | $1.23B 21.1% | $1.15B 20.2% | $1.10B 20.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $15.38B 72.5% | $14.58B 71.3% | $14.08B 73.7% | $14.00B 78.9% | $13.94B 85.9% | $13.00B 87.5% | $8.58B 84.2% | $4.07B 69.9% | $4.16B 73.1% | $4.06B 73.8% |
| Operating Income | $5.82B 27.5% | $5.88B 28.7% | $5.01B 26.3% | $3.74B 21.1% | $2.29B 14.1% | $1.85B 12.5% | $1.61B 15.8% | $1.75B 30.1% | $1.53B 26.9% | $1.45B 26.2% |
| Interest Expense | $1.53B 7.2% | $1.24B 6.1% | $1.00B 5.3% | $746.0M 4.2% | $696.0M 4.3% | $716.0M 4.8% | $507.0M 5.0% | $193.0M 3.3% | $176.0M 3.1% | $163.0M 3.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $38.0M 0.2% | $43.0M 0.2% | $28.0M 0.1% | $13.0M 0.1% | $3.0M 0.0% | $7.0M 0.0% | $34.0M 0.3% | $4.0M 0.1% | $1.0M 0.0% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$61.0M -0.3% | -$178.0M -0.9% | -$140.0M -0.7% | -$94.0M -0.5% | $71.0M 0.4% | $28.0M 0.2% | -$6.0M -0.1% | $9.0M 0.2% | $1.0M 0.0% | — |
| Pretax Income | $4.26B 20.1% | $4.51B 22.0% | $3.90B 20.4% | $2.91B 16.4% | $1.67B 10.3% | $1.17B 7.9% | $1.08B 10.6% | $1.55B 26.7% | $1.36B 23.8% | $1.27B 23.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $811.0M 3.8% | $641.0M 3.1% | $754.0M 3.9% | $551.0M 3.1% | $363.0M 2.2% | $196.0M 1.3% | $198.0M 1.9% | $378.0M 6.5% | $158.0M 2.8% | $492.0M 8.9% |
| Net Income | $3.48B 16.4% | $3.13B 15.3% | $3.07B 16.1% | $2.53B 14.3% | $1.33B 8.2% | $958.0M 6.5% | $893.0M 8.8% | $1.19B 20.4% | $1.25B 21.9% | $930.0M 16.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.36 | $5.41 | $5.02 | $3.94 | $2.01 | $1.42 | $1.74 | $2.93 | $2.95 | $2.11 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.34 | $5.38 | $4.98 | $3.91 | $1.99 | $1.40 | $1.71 | $2.87 | $2.89 | $2.08 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 547.1M | 578.7M | 611.7M | 642.3M | 662.6M | 672.1M | 512.3M | 405.5M | 422.3M | 440.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 549.0M | 582.1M | 615.9M | 647.9M | 671.6M | 683.4M | 522.6M | 413.7M | 431.3M | 447.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 2th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 12.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 21.1 | 32.2 | 38.1 | 35.8 | 34.2 | 34.4 | 32.1 | 32.5 |
| Operating Income | 30.1 | 15.8 | 12.5 | 14.1 | 21.1 | 26.3 | 28.7 | 27.5 |
| Income Tax | 6.5 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 3.8 |
| Net Income | 20.4 | 8.8 | 6.5 | 8.2 | 14.3 | 16.1 | 15.3 | 16.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FISV: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.84T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.13T | 43.0× | 38.5× | 23.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.92T | 44.6× | 34.4× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.75T | 28.2× | 19.9× | 11.3× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.63T | 72.3× | 64.6× | 25.6× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 121.7× | 57.4× | 27.7× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $804.3B | 186.2× | 190.3× | 23.2× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $485.4B | — | 60.6× | 9.2× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $435.8B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $414.4B | 275.1× | 286.8× | 92.6× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $348.4B | 61.5× | 33.0× | 3.1× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $347.0B | 65.9× | 55.4× | 18.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $336.4B | 49.0× | 38.7× | 11.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $316.6B | — | — | 1023.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $275.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $268.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $254.3B | 281.2× | 218.9× | 51.7× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $249.8B | 233.7× | 156.0× | 27.1× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| CRM | $241.0B | 33.3× | 26.0× | 5.8× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| TXN | $239.4B | 48.3× | 31.5× | 13.5× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $236.0B | 68.3× | 59.6× | 26.2× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| IBM | $233.4B | 22.3× | — | 3.5× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $226.6B | — | — | 30.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $193.5B | 36.0× | 14.5× | 4.4× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $185.4B | 71.3× | 121.2× | 22.6× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| FISV | $27.9B | 8.0× | 4.4× | 1.3× | 3.6% | — | 16.4% | 13.5% | 12.9% | 0.2× | 1,199 |
Peers = companies sharing FISV's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.