Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 232 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 29%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2019 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $32.21 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 4.8%/yr for a decade (off $165M normalized FCF).
The market's 4.8% is in line with its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.09B shares (market data) · net debt -$350M
mean 8.4% · volatility σ 28% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied 4.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (28%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $673000 buybacks = $673000 returned on $156M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2027 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2026 | FY2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 62.1 | 63.0 | 60.7 | 63.3 | 66.2 | 64.0 | 63.0 | 63.0 |
| Gross Profit | 37.9 | 37.0 | 39.3 | 36.7 | 33.8 | 36.0 | 37.0 | 37.0 |
| SG&A | 20.2 | 20.4 | 18.1 | 18.4 | 17.9 | 17.6 | 17.4 | 17.5 |
| Operating Income | 17.7 | 16.6 | 21.2 | 18.3 | 15.9 | 18.3 | 19.6 | 19.5 |
| Income Tax | 4.2 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Net Income | 13.9 | 13.0 | 16.2 | 13.9 | 12.1 | 14.8 | 15.6 | 15.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FIZZ: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2027
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2027 | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.18B 100.0% | $1.20B 100.0% | $1.19B 100.0% | $1.17B 100.0% | $1.14B 100.0% | $1.07B 100.0% | $1.00B 100.0% | $1.01B 100.0% | $975.7M 100.0% | $826.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $743.3M 63.0% | $757.4M 63.0% | $763.2M 64.0% | $776.1M 66.2% | $720.2M 63.3% | $650.6M 60.7% | $630.3M 63.0% | $629.8M 62.1% | $584.6M 59.9% | $500.8M 60.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $500.8M 60.6% |
| Gross Profit | $437.3M 37.0% | $443.9M 37.0% | $428.5M 36.0% | $396.8M 33.8% | $417.8M 36.7% | $421.6M 39.3% | $370.1M 37.0% | $384.4M 37.9% | $391.1M 40.1% | $326.1M 39.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $207.2M 17.5% | $208.5M 17.4% | $209.9M 17.6% | $210.1M 17.9% | $209.9M 18.4% | $193.8M 18.1% | $204.4M 20.4% | $204.4M 20.2% | $186.9M 19.2% | $163.6M 19.8% |
| Operating Income | $230.1M 19.5% | $235.5M 19.6% | $218.5M 18.3% | $186.7M 15.9% | $207.9M 18.3% | $227.8M 21.2% | $165.7M 16.6% | $179.9M 17.7% | $204.2M 20.9% | — |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $202K 0.0% | $201K 0.0% | $189K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $10.5M 0.9% | $9.1M 0.8% | $11.3M 1.0% | -$242K -0.0% | -$260K -0.0% | $312K 0.0% | $3.7M 0.4% | -$3.9M -0.4% | $1.3M 0.1% | $537K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $240.6M 20.4% | $244.6M 20.4% | $229.8M 19.3% | $186.4M 15.9% | $207.6M 18.2% | $228.1M 21.3% | $169.5M 16.9% | $183.9M 18.1% | $205.5M 21.1% | $162.8M 19.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $56.9M 4.8% | $57.7M 4.8% | $53.1M 4.5% | $44.3M 3.8% | $49.1M 4.3% | $54.0M 5.0% | $39.5M 3.9% | $43.0M 4.2% | $55.7M 5.7% | $55.8M 6.7% |
| Net Income | $183.6M 15.6% | $186.8M 15.6% | $176.7M 14.8% | $142.2M 12.1% | $158.5M 13.9% | $174.1M 16.2% | $130.0M 13.0% | $140.9M 13.9% | $149.8M 15.3% | $107.0M 12.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.96 | $2.00 | $1.89 | $1.52 | $1.70 | $1.87 | $1.39 | $1.51 | $3.21 | $2.30 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.96 | $1.99 | $1.89 | $1.52 | $1.69 | $1.86 | $1.39 | $1.50 | $3.19 | $2.29 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 93.6M | 93.6M | 93.4M | 93.3M | 93.3M | 93.3M | 93K | 93K | 47K | 46.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 93.7M | 93.7M | 93.6M | 93.6M | 93.6M | 93.6M | 94K | 94K | 47K | 46.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| FIZZ | $3.0B | 16.4× | 10.6× | 2.5× | -1.7% | 37.0% | 15.6% | 28.9% | 28.9% | — | 232 |
Peers = companies sharing FIZZ's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.