Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -0.90% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.25 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.4%/yr for a decade (off $2M normalized FCF).
The market's 3.4% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt $0
mean 529.2% · volatility σ 1460% · implied rate exceeded in 1/5 yrs
Central path = implied 3.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (1460%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| FKWL | $27M | — | — | 0.6× | 49.6% | 17.2% | -0.5% | -0.7% | -0.7% | — | 21 |
Peers = companies sharing FKWL's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.1M 100.0% | $30.8M 100.0% | $45.9M 100.0% | $24.0M 100.0% | $184.1M 100.0% | $75.1M 100.0% | $36.5M 100.0% | $30.1M 100.0% | $48.6M 100.0% | $59.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $38.2M 82.8% | $27.3M 88.6% | $38.9M 84.7% | $20.2M 84.1% | $151.7M 82.4% | $60.5M 80.7% | $30.7M 84.3% | $24.9M 82.7% | $39.3M 81.0% | $49.9M 83.4% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $39.3M 81.0% | $49.9M 83.4% |
| Gross Profit | $7.9M 17.2% | $3.5M 11.4% | $7.0M 15.3% | $3.8M 15.9% | $32.5M 17.6% | $14.5M 19.3% | $5.7M 15.7% | $5.2M 17.3% | $9.2M 19.0% | $9.9M 16.6% |
| Research & Development | $4.1M 8.9% | $3.4M 11.1% | $3.9M 8.5% | $4.3M 17.8% | $4.6M 2.5% | $3.7M 5.0% | $3.0M 8.1% | $3.4M 11.2% | $3.4M 7.1% | $3.0M 5.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.7M 14.5% | $6.0M 19.6% | $5.5M 11.9% | $4.5M 18.8% | $5.1M 2.8% | $3.7M 4.9% | $4.9M 13.4% | $4.5M 15.0% | $4.9M 10.1% | $4.8M 8.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $10.8M 23.4% | $9.4M 30.7% | $9.4M 20.4% | $8.8M 36.6% | $9.6M 5.2% | $7.4M 9.9% | $7.8M 21.5% | $7.9M 26.2% | $8.3M 17.2% | $7.8M 13.1% |
| Operating Income | -$2.9M -6.2% | -$5.9M -19.3% | -$2.3M -5.1% | -$5.0M -20.7% | $22.8M 12.4% | $7.1M 9.4% | -$2.1M -5.8% | -$2.7M -9.0% | $874K 1.8% | $2.1M 3.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.7M 5.8% | $824K 2.7% | -$1.5M -3.2% | $265K 1.1% | $617K 0.3% | $221K 0.3% | $205K 0.6% | $332K 1.1% | $271K 0.6% | $92K 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$186K -0.4% | -$5.1M -16.6% | -$3.8M -8.3% | -$4.7M -19.6% | $23.4M 12.7% | $7.3M 9.7% | -$1.9M -5.2% | -$2.4M -7.8% | $1.1M 2.4% | $2.2M 3.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$45K -0.1% | -$949K -3.1% | -$887K -1.9% | -$1.0M -4.3% | $5.0M 2.7% | $1.4M 1.8% | -$429K -1.2% | -$187K -0.6% | $375K 0.8% | $35K 0.1% |
| Net Income | -$243K -0.5% | -$4.0M -12.9% | -$2.9M -6.2% | -$3.8M -15.7% | $17.7M 9.6% | $5.6M 7.4% | -$1.3M -3.5% | -$2.1M -7.0% | $874K 1.8% | $1.6M 2.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.02 | $-0.34 | $-0.24 | $-0.32 | $1.56 | $0.52 | $-0.12 | $-0.20 | $0.08 | $0.15 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.34 | $-0.24 | $-0.32 | $1.53 | $0.52 | $-0.12 | $-0.20 | $0.08 | $0.15 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 11.8M | 11.8M | 11.7M | 11.6M | 11.4M | 10.6M | 10.6M | 10.5M | 10.5M | 10.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 11.8M | 11.8M | 11.7M | 11.6M | 11.6M | 10.7M | 10.6M | 10.5M | 10.7M | 10.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 22 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 16th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 82.7 | 84.3 | 80.7 | 82.4 | 84.1 | 84.7 | 88.6 | 82.8 |
| Gross Profit | 17.3 | 15.7 | 19.3 | 17.6 | 15.9 | 15.3 | 11.4 | 17.2 |
| R&D | 11.2 | 8.1 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 17.8 | 8.5 | 11.1 | 8.9 |
| SG&A | 15.0 | 13.4 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 18.8 | 11.9 | 19.6 | 14.5 |
| Operating Income | -9.0 | -5.8 | 9.4 | 12.4 | -20.7 | -5.1 | -19.3 | -6.2 |
| Income Tax | -0.6 | -1.2 | 1.8 | 2.7 | -4.3 | -1.9 | -3.1 | -0.1 |
| Net Income | -7.0 | -3.5 | 7.4 | 9.6 | -15.7 | -6.2 | -12.9 | -0.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FKWL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.