Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -58.97% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 243 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC | $673.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 154 |
| XOM | $633.7B | 22.6× | — | 1.9× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| CVX | $344.7B | 28.1× | — | 1.8× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| RYDAF | $253.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| TTE | $187.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $144.0B | 18.1× | — | 2.4× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| STOHF | $99.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| VLO | $93.4B | 40.0× | 17.9× | 0.8× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| CNQ | $93.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 709 |
| MPC | $90.8B | 22.5× | 7.8× | 0.7× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EIPAF | $84.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| PSX | $82.2B | 18.8× | — | 0.6× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 8.9% | — | 2,041 |
| SU | $75.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 724 |
| SLB | $74.6B | 21.2× | — | 2.1× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| EOG | $72.9B | 14.7× | 7.1× | 3.2× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| BKR | $61.2B | — | — | 2.2× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 10.1% | — | 1,095 |
| IMO | $60.7B | 19.3× | — | 1.3× | -8.6% | — | 6.9% | 14.7% | 12.7% | — | 394 |
| LNG | $56.0B | 10.6× | 7.4× | 2.8× | 27.2% | — | 34.0% | 85.8% | 22.1% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| TRGP | $55.8B | 30.6× | 15.1× | 3.3× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| OKE | $54.9B | 16.1× | 11.9× | 1.6× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| FANG | $53.0B | 32.5× | 10.7× | 3.5× | 35.8% | — | 10.3% | 4.2% | 3.0% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| CVE | $52.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 437 |
| WOPEF | $42.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| CCJ | $41.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 970 |
| FLOC | $559M | 16.7× | 2.9× | 0.7× | 41.9% | 54.4% | 5.4% | 18.1% | 10.4% | 0.7× | 137 |
Peers = companies sharing FLOC's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $759.7M 100.0% | $535.3M 100.0% | $243.3M 100.0% | $148.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $346.6M 45.6% | $264.4M 49.4% | $104.8M 43.1% | $55.5M 37.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $118.6M 15.6% | $62.5M 11.7% | $15.2M 6.3% | $14.2M 9.5% |
| Operating Income | $149.0M 19.6% | $116.7M 21.8% | $78.3M 32.2% | $42.7M 28.7% |
| Interest Expense | $18.9M 2.5% | $32.3M 6.0% | $19.0M 7.8% | $9.3M 6.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $740K 0.1% | -$35.3M -6.6% | -$19.9M -8.2% | -$9.7M -6.5% |
| Pretax Income | $130.8M 17.2% | $81.4M 15.2% | $58.5M 24.0% | $33.0M 22.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$842K -0.1% | $1.2M 0.2% | $379K 0.2% | $283K 0.2% |
| Net Income | $41.4M 5.4% | $80.2M 15.0% | $58.1M 23.9% | $32.7M 22.0% |
| Per Share | ||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.53 | $10.41 | $11.39 | $32729.00 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.24 | $10.41 | $11.39 | $32729.00 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 27.0M | 7.7M | 5.1M | 1K |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 90.7M | 7.7M | 5.1M | 1K |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $20.72 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -6.3%/yr for a decade (off $98M normalized FCF).
The market's -6.3% is more conservative than its 2-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt $163M
mean 109.9% · volatility σ 31% · implied rate exceeded in 2/2 yrs
Central path = implied -6.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (31%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $15M buybacks = $15M returned on $167M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 4 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 4 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $5M covers the $0 due within a year 4522000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~11.3% on $168M of debt.
Cash of $5M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 37.3 | 43.1 | 49.4 | 45.6 |
| SG&A | 9.5 | 6.3 | 11.7 | 15.6 |
| Operating Income | 28.7 | 32.2 | 21.8 | 19.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.1 |
| Net Income | 22.0 | 23.9 | 15.0 | 5.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FLOC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.