Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 260 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $669.5M 100.0% | $510.9M 100.0% | $413.0M 100.0% | $341.0M 100.0% | $262.7M 100.0% | $149.7M 100.0% | $114.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $515.6M 77.0% | $382.2M 74.8% | $344.0M 83.3% | $338.2M 99.2% | $476.2M 181.2% | $114.1M 76.2% | $89.3M 77.9% |
| Gross Profit | $153.8M 23.0% | $128.7M 25.2% | $69.0M 16.7% | $2.9M 0.8% | -$213.4M -81.2% | $35.7M 23.8% | $25.3M 22.1% |
| Research & Development | $31.1M 4.6% | $24.6M 4.8% | $26.1M 6.3% | $29.9M 8.8% | $26.5M 10.1% | $11.2M 7.5% | $13.3M 11.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $208.0M 31.1% | $123.0M 24.1% | $85.2M 20.6% | $122.8M 36.0% | $293.2M 111.6% | $31.6M 21.1% | $29.5M 25.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $305.2M 45.6% | $187.2M 36.7% | $143.2M 34.7% | $185.7M 54.5% | $359.9M 137.0% | $56.7M 37.9% | $61.5M 53.7% |
| Operating Income | -$151.3M -22.6% | -$58.5M -11.5% | -$74.2M -18.0% | -$182.9M -53.6% | -$573.3M -218.2% | -$21.0M -14.0% | -$36.2M -31.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $33.6M 5.0% | -$7.7M -1.5% | -$9.1M -2.2% | -$408K -0.1% | -$31.2M -11.9% | -$7.5M -5.0% | -$9.4M -8.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$117.7M -17.6% | -$66.3M -13.0% | -$83.3M -20.2% | -$183.3M -53.7% | -$604.5M -230.1% | -$28.5M -19.1% | -$45.6M -39.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$2.5M -0.4% | $509K 0.1% | $5.3M 1.3% | $1.7M 0.5% | -$11.7M -4.5% | $1.8M 1.2% | -$5.4M -4.7% |
| Net Income | -$111.6M -16.7% | -$63.0M -12.3% | -$85.5M -20.7% | -$181.6M -53.3% | -$592.8M -225.6% | -$30.3M -20.3% | -$40.2M -35.1% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.44 | $-0.27 | $-0.38 | $-0.85 | $-3.79 | $-0.89 | $-1.00 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.44 | $-0.27 | $-0.38 | $-0.85 | $-3.79 | $-0.89 | $-1.00 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 254.8M | 229.5M | 225.9M | 198.9M | 150.9M | 70.0M | 68.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 254.8M | 229.5M | 225.9M | 198.9M | 150.9M | 70.0M | 68.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $8.33 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -60.0%/yr for a decade (off $48M normalized FCF).
The market's -60.0% is more conservative than its 5-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$281M
mean -12.9% · volatility σ 531% · implied rate exceeded in 2/3 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (531%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $65M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -15%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $281M covers all $93M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-12-31 (20-F).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| GENI | $83M | — | — | 0.1× | 31.0% | 23.0% | -16.7% | -15.4% | -15.4% | — | 260 |
Peers = companies sharing GENI's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 8th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.9 | 76.2 | 181.2 | 99.2 | 83.3 | 74.8 | 77.0 |
| Gross Profit | 22.1 | 23.8 | -81.2 | 0.8 | 16.7 | 25.2 | 23.0 |
| R&D | 11.6 | 7.5 | 10.1 | 8.8 | 6.3 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| SG&A | 25.7 | 21.1 | 111.6 | 36.0 | 20.6 | 24.1 | 31.1 |
| Operating Income | -31.6 | -14.0 | -218.2 | -53.6 | -18.0 | -11.5 | -22.6 |
| Income Tax | -4.7 | 1.2 | -4.5 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.1 | -0.4 |
| Net Income | -35.1 | -20.3 | -225.6 | -53.3 | -20.7 | -12.3 | -16.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GENI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.