Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 628 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.99B 100.0% | $5.78B 100.0% | $5.45B 100.0% | $5.23B 100.0% | $5.11B 100.0% | $4.74B 100.0% | $4.53B 100.0% | $4.30B 100.0% | $4.16B 100.0% | $3.93B 100.0% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | $1.26B 23.1% | $1.18B 22.6% | $1.22B 23.8% | $901.1M 19.0% | $910.7M 20.1% | $865.5M 20.1% | $807.0M 19.4% | $782.9M 19.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | — | — | $302.1M 5.5% | $307.5M 5.9% | $282.0M 5.5% | $254.9M 5.4% | $249.1M 5.5% | $227.5M 5.3% | $210.6M 5.1% | $197.2M 5.0% |
| Operating Income | — | — | $1.27B 23.2% | $1.19B 22.7% | $1.23B 24.0% | $905.4M 19.1% | $920.1M 20.3% | $870.6M 20.2% | $821.2M 19.8% | $787.3M 20.0% |
| Interest Expense | $141.2M 2.4% | $127.1M 2.2% | $102.3M 1.9% | $90.4M 1.7% | $83.5M 1.6% | $86.7M 1.8% | $84.3M 1.9% | $90.1M 2.1% | $84.5M 2.0% | $83.3M 2.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$2.2M -0.0% | -$2.6M -0.0% | -$4.2M -0.1% | $5.3M 0.1% | $11.9M 0.2% | $4.3M 0.1% | $9.4M 0.2% | $5.2M 0.1% | $14.1M 0.3% | $4.3M 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $1.44B 24.0% | $1.33B 23.0% | $1.19B 21.9% | $1.10B 21.1% | $1.27B 24.9% | $896.7M 18.9% | $931.3M 20.6% | $863.7M 20.1% | $830.6M 20.0% | $772.2M 19.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $274.7M 4.6% | $255.9M 4.4% | $223.5M 4.1% | $207.7M 4.0% | $243.5M 4.8% | $164.9M 3.5% | $170.4M 3.8% | $162.2M 3.8% | -$627.6M -15.1% | $232.6M 5.9% |
| Net Income | $1.16B 19.4% | $1.07B 18.5% | $970.8M 17.8% | $894.4M 17.1% | $1.03B 20.2% | $731.8M 15.4% | $760.8M 16.8% | $701.5M 16.3% | $1.45B 35.0% | $549.8M 14.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $14.27 | $11.99 | $10.21 | $9.13 | $10.10 | $6.90 | $6.97 | $6.22 | $12.50 | $4.58 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $14.07 | $11.94 | $10.07 | $9.04 | $9.99 | $6.82 | $6.83 | $6.09 | $12.22 | $4.49 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 81.4M | 89.3M | 95.1M | 97.9M | 102.1M | 106.1M | 109.2M | 112.9M | 116.3M | 120.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 82.5M | 89.7M | 96.4M | 99.0M | 103.2M | 107.2M | 111.4M | 115.2M | 119.0M | 122.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 7% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $86M dividends + $881M buybacks = $967M returned on $1.3B FCF.
7 consecutive years of dividend increases · 6%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 14%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $145M is below the $306M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~5.4% on $2.6B of debt.
Cash of $145M is below short-term debt of $305M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
No current price collected.
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit | 20.1 | 20.1 | 19.0 | 23.8 | 22.6 | 23.1 | — | — |
| SG&A | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 5.5 | — | — |
| Operating Income | 20.2 | 20.3 | 19.1 | 24.0 | 22.7 | 23.2 | — | — |
| Income Tax | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Net Income | 16.3 | 16.8 | 15.4 | 20.2 | 17.1 | 17.8 | 18.5 | 19.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.