Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 186 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~8.2% on $834M of debt.
Cash of $125M fully covers short-term debt of $3M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| GOGO | $600M | 49.6× | 7.5× | 0.7× | 105% | — | 1.4% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 4.8× | 186 |
Peers = companies sharing GOGO's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $910.5M 100.0% | $444.7M 100.0% | $397.6M 100.0% | $404.1M 100.0% | $335.7M 100.0% | $269.7M 100.0% | $309.0M 100.0% | $290.2M 100.0% | $699.1M 100.0% | $596.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | $67.6M 15.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research & Development | $56.1M 6.2% | $44.8M 10.1% | $36.7M 9.2% | $29.6M 7.3% | $24.9M 7.4% | $25.2M 9.3% | $26.0M 8.4% | $18.5M 6.4% | $78.1M 11.2% | $45.9M 7.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $116.7M 12.8% | $125.1M 28.1% | $57.3M 14.4% | $58.2M 14.4% | $51.6M 15.4% | $54.5M 20.2% | $54.6M 17.7% | $57.9M 20.0% | $93.7M 13.4% | $84.9M 14.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $796.4M 87.5% | $393.4M 88.5% | $273.4M 68.8% | $261.7M 64.8% | $215.1M 64.1% | $193.4M 71.7% | $212.5M 68.8% | $207.7M 71.6% | $763.4M 109.2% | $623.2M 104.5% |
| Operating Income | $114.1M 12.5% | $51.3M 11.5% | $124.2M 31.2% | $142.3M 35.2% | $120.6M 35.9% | $76.4M 28.3% | $96.5M 31.2% | $82.4M 28.4% | -$64.3M -9.2% | -$26.6M -4.5% |
| Interest Expense | $68.2M 7.5% | $38.4M 8.6% | $33.1M 8.3% | $38.9M 9.6% | $67.5M 20.1% | $125.8M 46.6% | $130.5M 42.2% | $122.6M 42.3% | $111.9M 16.0% | $83.6M 14.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $4.7M 0.5% | $8.3M 1.9% | $7.4M 1.9% | $2.4M 0.6% | $191K 0.1% | $722K 0.3% | $4.0M 1.3% | $4.1M 1.4% | $3.0M 0.4% | $1.6M 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$87.3M -9.6% | -$33.1M -7.5% | -$26.6M -6.7% | -$36.6M -9.1% | -$151.3M -45.1% | -$125.1M -46.4% | -$184.5M -59.7% | -$138.2M -47.6% | -$109.7M -15.7% | -$96.6M -16.2% |
| Pretax Income | $26.8M 2.9% | $18.1M 4.1% | $97.6M 24.5% | $105.7M 26.2% | -$30.6M -9.1% | -$48.7M -18.1% | -$87.9M -28.5% | -$55.8M -19.2% | -$174.0M -24.9% | -$123.2M -20.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $13.9M 1.5% | $4.4M 1.0% | -$48.1M -12.1% | $13.7M 3.4% | -$187.2M -55.8% | -$146K -0.1% | $563K 0.2% | -$3.4M -1.2% | -$2.0M -0.3% | $1.3M 0.2% |
| Net Income | $12.9M 1.4% | $13.7M 3.1% | $145.7M 36.6% | $92.1M 22.8% | $152.7M 45.5% | -$250.0M -92.7% | -$146.0M -47.3% | -$162.0M -55.8% | -$172.0M -24.6% | -$124.5M -20.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.10 | $0.11 | $1.12 | $0.75 | $1.46 | $-3.04 | $-1.81 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.09 | $0.10 | $1.09 | $0.71 | $1.28 | $-3.04 | $-1.81 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 134K | 129K | 130K | 123K | 103K | 82K | 81K | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 137K | 131K | 133K | 134K | 127K | 82K | 81K | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $4.46 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 10.9%/yr for a decade (off $52M normalized FCF).
The market's 10.9% is more optimistic than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt $708M
mean 27.7% · volatility σ 96% · implied rate exceeded in 1/3 yrs
Central path = implied 10.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (96%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $65M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 15th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.2 | — |
| R&D | 6.4 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 9.2 | 10.1 | 6.2 |
| SG&A | 20.0 | 17.7 | 20.2 | 15.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 28.1 | 12.8 |
| Operating Income | 28.4 | 31.2 | 28.3 | 35.9 | 35.2 | 31.2 | 11.5 | 12.5 |
| Income Tax | -1.2 | 0.2 | -0.1 | -55.8 | 3.4 | -12.1 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Net Income | -55.8 | -47.3 | -92.7 | 45.5 | 22.8 | 36.6 | 3.1 | 1.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GOGO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.