Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-01 | Carter Ryan Stuart Executive Vice President | Plan purchase | 100 | $13.02 | $1k |
| 2026-08-03 | Carter Ryan Stuart Executive Vice President | Plan purchase | 100 | $12.58 | $1k |
| 2026-07-01 | Carter Ryan Stuart Executive Vice President | Plan purchase | 100 | $12.26 | $1k |
| 2026-06-01 | Carter Ryan Stuart Executive Vice President | Plan purchase | 100 | $12.51 | $1k |
| 2026-05-01 |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
Carter Ryan Stuart Executive Vice President |
| Plan purchase |
| 100 |
| $12.66 |
| $1k |
| 2026-04-01 | Carter Ryan Stuart Executive Vice President | Plan purchase1d late | 100 | $11.48 | $1k |
| 2026-02-25 | Gerson Gary Chief Financial Officer | Open-market buy | 275 | $12.46 | $3k |
| 2025-11-13 | Gerson Gary Chief Financial Officer | Open-market buyindirect | 100 | $11.31 | $1k |
| 2025-11-11 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Open-market buy | 7,600 | $11.05 | $84k |
| 2025-11-11 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Open-market buyindirect | 100 | $11.05 | $1k |
| 2025-11-11 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Open-market buyindirect | 200 | $11.05 | $2k |
| 2025-11-07 | Cooper Arthur S. President | Open-market buyindirect | 7,002 | $10.70 | $75k |
| 2025-11-06 | Gerson Gary Chief Financial Officer | Open-market buy | 500 | $10.65 | $5k |
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 77% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $68.2M dividends + $0 buybacks = $68.2M returned on $88.2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 64th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 11% against ROIC 2% — 9% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 2.2 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| Net Income | 11.5 | 8.4 | 11.2 | 7.9 | 7.3 | 3.4 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GOOD: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~5.0% on $843.5M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it. This year they exceeded net income, so the ribbons are capped at earnings and understate what was actually returned.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $161.3M 100.0% | $149.4M 100.0% | $147.6M 100.0% | $149.0M 100.0% | $137.7M 100.0% | $133.2M 100.0% | $114.4M 100.0% | $106.8M 100.0% | $94.8M 100.0% | $86.4M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $4.0M 2.5% | $3.9M 2.6% | $4.4M 3.0% | $3.7M 2.5% | $3.2M 2.3% | $3.3M 2.4% | $3.2M 2.8% | $2.4M 2.2% | $2.4M 2.5% | $2.4M 2.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $101.4M 62.8% | $102.8M 68.8% | $116.1M 78.7% | $116.2M 78.0% | $101.6M 73.8% | $99.9M 75.0% | $80.2M 70.1% | $71.1M 66.6% | $68.3M 72.1% | $55.6M 64.4% |
| Interest Expense | $41.9M 26.0% | $37.4M 25.0% | $37.3M 25.3% | $32.5M 21.8% | $26.9M 19.5% | $26.8M 20.1% | $28.3M 24.7% | $26.2M 24.5% | $24.6M 25.9% | $25.9M 30.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$40.7M -25.2% | -$22.5M -15.1% | -$26.6M -18.0% | -$22.0M -14.7% | -$25.2M -18.3% | -$18.3M -13.8% | -$24.6M -21.5% | -$23.3M -21.9% | -$20.5M -21.7% | -$26.8M -31.1% |
| Net Income | $19.3M 12.0% | $24.0M 16.1% | $5.0M 3.4% | $10.8M 7.3% | $10.9M 7.9% | $14.9M 11.2% | $9.6M 8.4% | $12.3M 11.5% | $5.9M 6.3% | $4.0M 4.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.14 | $0.27 | -$0.19 | -$0.04 | -$0.09 | $0.09 | -$0.16 | $0.03 | -$0.19 | -$0.16 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.14 | $0.27 | -$0.19 | -$0.04 | -$0.09 | $0.09 | -$0.16 | $0.03 | -$0.19 | -$0.16 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 46.5M | 41.8M | 39.9M | 39.0M | 36.5M | 34.0M | 30.7M | 28.7M | 26.4M | 23.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 46.5M | 41.8M | 39.9M | 39.0M | 36.5M | 34.0M | 30.7M | 28.7M | 26.4M | 23.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 15 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMRK | $2.1B | 16.9× | 9.0× | 0.6× | 20.3% | — | 3.8% | 8.6% | 5.9% | 1.6× | 58 |
| GTY | $1.9B | 20.7× | — | 8.5× | 9.0% | — | 35.7% | 7.4% | 3.8% | — | 66 |
| OPEN | $1.7B | — | — | 0.4× | -15.2% | 8.0% | -29.7% | -129% | -129% | — | 66 |
| IIPR | $1.4B | 13.2× | 9.0× | 5.4× | -13.8% | — | 44.5% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 1.8× | 68 |
| FOR | $1.2B | 7.3× | — | 0.7× | 10.1% | 21.9% | 10.1% | 9.5% | 6.5% | — | 29 |
| AGNT | $648M | — | — | 0.1× | 4.5% | 7.0% | -0.5% | -9.4% | -9.4% | — | — |
| HPP | $572M | — | 1.3× | 0.7× | -1.3% | 48.5% | -71.3% | -19.9% | -19.9% | -0.4× | 32 |
| GOOD | $553M | 81.6× | — | 3.4× | 8.0% | — | 12.0% | 11.2% | 1.9% | — | 47 |
| REAX | $508M | — | — | 0.3× | 55.7% | 8.4% | -0.4% | -15.7% | -15.7% | — | — |
| AHRT | $454M | — | 14.0× | 2.2× | 2.7% | — | 2.7% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 10.3× | 43 |
| TRC | $443M | — | — | 8.9× | 18.4% | 29.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 26 |
| SKYH | $391M | 109.9× | — | 14.2× | 86.6% | — | 68.3% | 10.9% | 5.2% | — | 17 |
| BOC | $369M | — | 30.7× | 3.2× | 5.6% | 65.8% | -10.9% | -2.4% | -2.2% | 2.5× | 21 |
| FRPH | $360M | 104.2× | 30.0× | 8.4× | 2.6% | — | 7.8% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 10.5× | 22 |
| ARL | $298M | 19.0× | 80.3× | 6.0× | 5.7% | — | 31.4% | 2.5% | 1.9% | — | 10 |
| NTPIF | $268M | — | — | 5.6× | 64.5% | 25.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing GOOD's sector (Lessors of Real Property, NEC) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2016 | not reported | not reported | 4.6% |
| FY2017 | not reported | not reported | 6.3% |
| FY2018 | not reported | not reported | 11.5% |
| FY2019 | not reported | not reported | 8.4% |
| FY2020 | not reported | not reported | 11.2% |
| FY2021 | not reported | not reported | 7.9% |
| FY2022 | not reported | not reported | 7.3% |
| FY2023 | not reported | not reported | 3.4% |
| FY2024 | not reported | not reported | 16.1% |
| FY2025 | not reported | not reported | 12.0% |
Leverage and buybacks account for 9 points of the 11% return on equity in FY2025. The business earns 2% on the capital it employs; the rest is balance sheet.
ROE is on average equity; ROIC is NOPAT over average invested capital (debt plus equity less excess cash). The gap is not a single adjustment.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Converts 6.37x of reported profit into free cash flow over 5 years, with accruals negative.
Shares outstanding are up 49% since FY2019 — per-share cash flow has grown more slowly than the totals above, and the gap is the owners'.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: share_based_compensation.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a reit.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
At $11.43, free cash flow must compound 7.87%/yr for 10 years. It has done 6.56%/yr over 6 years, though across a reporting-basis change.
| Fiscal year | FCF growth | Price requires |
|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 8.8% | 7.9% |
| FY2021 | 7.1% | 7.9% |
| FY2022 | −1.4% | 7.9% |
| FY2023 | −12.7% | 7.9% |
| FY2024 | −5.7% | 7.9% |
| FY2025 | 54.8% | 7.9% |
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM.
The achieved growth rate spans a reporting-basis change in FY2021, so part of it measures the restatement rather than the business.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $19M | $19M |
| Share-based comp | not reported | not reported |
| Other non-cash & working capital | $69M | $88M |
| Operating cash flow | $88M | $88M |
| Capex | $0 | $88M |
| Free cash flow | $88M | $88M |
| Fiscal year | Revenue growth | Receivables growth | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 16.4% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2021 | 3.4% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2022 | 8.2% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2023 | -0.9% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2024 | 1.2% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2025 | 8.0% | not reported | not reported |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | -4.9 percent |
| FY2020 | -4.6 percent |
| FY2021 | -5.2 percent |
| FY2022 | -4.8 percent |
| FY2023 | -4.9 percent |
| FY2024 | -3.0 percent |
| FY2025 | -5.5 percent |