Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 198 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
No trend data available for this metric.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $161.3M 100.0% | $149.4M 100.0% | $147.6M 100.0% | $149.0M 100.0% | $137.7M 100.0% | $133.2M 100.0% | $114.4M 100.0% | $106.8M 100.0% | $94.8M 100.0% | $86.4M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $4.0M 2.5% | $3.9M 2.6% | $4.4M 3.0% | $3.7M 2.5% | $3.2M 2.3% | $3.3M 2.4% | $3.2M 2.8% | $2.4M 2.2% | $2.4M 2.5% | $2.4M 2.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $101.4M 62.8% | $102.8M 68.8% | $116.1M 78.7% | $116.2M 78.0% | $101.6M 73.8% | $99.9M 75.0% | $80.2M 70.1% | $71.1M 66.6% | $68.3M 72.1% | $55.6M 64.4% |
| Interest Expense | $41.9M 26.0% | $37.4M 25.0% | $37.3M 25.3% | $32.5M 21.8% | $26.9M 19.5% | $26.8M 20.1% | $28.3M 24.7% | $26.2M 24.5% | $24.6M 25.9% | $25.9M 30.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$40.7M -25.2% | -$22.5M -15.1% | -$26.6M -18.0% | -$22.0M -14.7% | -$25.2M -18.3% | -$18.3M -13.8% | -$24.6M -21.5% | -$23.3M -21.9% | -$20.5M -21.7% | -$26.8M -31.1% |
| Net Income | $19.3M 12.0% | $24.0M 16.1% | $5.0M 3.4% | $10.8M 7.3% | $10.9M 7.9% | $14.9M 11.2% | $9.6M 8.4% | $12.3M 11.5% | $5.9M 6.3% | $4.0M 4.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.14 | $0.27 | $-0.19 | $-0.04 | $-0.09 | $0.09 | $-0.16 | $0.03 | $-0.19 | $-0.16 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.14 | $0.27 | $-0.19 | $-0.04 | $-0.09 | $0.09 | $-0.16 | $0.03 | $-0.19 | $-0.16 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 46.5M | 41.8M | 39.9M | 39.0M | 36.5M | 34.0M | 30.7M | 28.7M | 26.4M | 23.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 46.5M | 41.8M | 39.9M | 39.0M | 36.5M | 34.0M | 30.7M | 28.7M | 26.4M | 23.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $68M dividends + $0 buybacks = $68M returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~5.0% on $843M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
No current price collected.
No standout strengths flagged.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 2.2 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| Net Income | 11.5 | 8.4 | 11.2 | 7.9 | 7.3 | 3.4 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GOOD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.