Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 377 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| GT | $2.0B | — | — | 0.1× | -3.2% | 18.4% | -9.4% | -53.2% | -18.8% | — | 377 |
Peers = companies sharing GT's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$30M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -19%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $801M is below the $1.2B due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~7.5% on $5.9B of debt.
Cash of $801M is below short-term debt of $870M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.28B 100.0% | $18.88B 100.0% | $20.07B 100.0% | $20.80B 100.0% | $17.48B 100.0% | $12.32B 100.0% | $14.74B 100.0% | $15.47B 100.0% | $15.38B 100.0% | $15.16B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $14.91B 81.6% | $15.19B 80.5% | $16.58B 82.6% | $16.95B 81.5% | $13.69B 78.3% | $10.34B 83.9% | $11.60B 78.7% | $11.96B 77.3% | $11.68B 76.0% | $10.94B 72.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $11.72B 76.2% | $10.97B 72.4% |
| Research & Development | $380.0M 2.1% | $426.0M 2.3% | $461.0M 2.3% | $501.0M 2.4% | $473.0M 2.7% | $390.0M 3.2% | $430.0M 2.9% | $424.0M 2.7% | $406.0M 2.6% | $388.0M 2.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $2.72B 14.9% | $2.78B 14.7% | $2.81B 14.0% | $2.80B 13.4% | $2.70B 15.4% | $2.19B 17.8% | $2.32B 15.8% | $2.31B 14.9% | $2.28B 14.8% | $2.41B 15.9% |
| Interest Expense | $445.0M 2.4% | $522.0M 2.8% | $532.0M 2.7% | $451.0M 2.2% | $387.0M 2.2% | $324.0M 2.6% | $340.0M 2.3% | $321.0M 2.1% | $335.0M 2.2% | $372.0M 2.5% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $37.0M 0.2% | $54.0M 0.3% | $84.0M 0.4% | $34.0M 0.2% | $24.0M 0.1% | $14.0M 0.1% | $18.0M 0.1% | $16.0M 0.1% | $13.0M 0.1% | $15.0M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$288.0M -1.6% | -$134.0M -0.7% | -$231.0M -1.2% | -$209.0M -1.0% | -$94.0M -0.5% | -$119.0M -1.0% | $98.0M 0.7% | $174.0M 1.1% | -$70.0M -0.5% | -$25.0M -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$133.0M -0.7% | $130.0M 0.7% | -$721.0M -3.6% | $399.0M 1.9% | $513.0M 2.9% | -$1.14B -9.3% | $177.0M 1.2% | $1.01B 6.5% | $878.0M 5.7% | $1.21B 8.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $1.57B 8.6% | $95.0M 0.5% | $10.0M 0.0% | $190.0M 0.9% | -$267.0M -1.5% | $110.0M 0.9% | $474.0M 3.2% | $303.0M 2.0% | $513.0M 3.3% | -$77.0M -0.5% |
| Net Income | -$1.72B -9.4% | $46.0M 0.2% | -$729.0M -3.6% | $191.0M 0.9% | $764.0M 4.4% | -$1.25B -10.2% | -$311.0M -2.1% | $693.0M 4.5% | $346.0M 2.3% | $1.26B 8.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-5.99 | $0.16 | $-2.56 | $0.67 | $2.92 | $-5.35 | $-1.33 | $2.92 | $1.39 | $4.81 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-5.99 | $0.16 | $-2.56 | $0.67 | $2.89 | $-5.35 | $-1.33 | $2.89 | $1.37 | $4.74 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 288.0M | 287.0M | 285.0M | 284.0M | 261.0M | 234.0M | 233 | 237.0M | 249.0M | 263.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 288.0M | 288.0M | 285.0M | 286.0M | 264.0M | 234.0M | 233 | 239.0M | 253.0M | 266.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 7th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.3 | 78.7 | 83.9 | 78.3 | 81.5 | 82.6 | 80.5 | 81.6 |
| R&D | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
| SG&A | 14.9 | 15.8 | 17.8 | 15.4 | 13.4 | 14.0 | 14.7 | 14.9 |
| Income Tax | 2.0 | 3.2 | 0.9 | -1.5 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 8.6 |
| Net Income | 4.5 | -2.1 | -10.2 | 4.4 | 0.9 | -3.6 | 0.2 | -9.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.