Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Ranked against 13 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | $176.0B | 32.9× | 13.3× | 4.0× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 0.7× | 1,051 |
| MSI | $81.3B | 38.5× | 26.2× | 7.0× | 8.0% | 51.7% | 18.4% | 89.4% | 18.6% | 2.3× | 450 |
| UI | $34.1B | 35.6× | 27.9× | 10.4× | 27.2% | 46.2% | 29.3% | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.4× | 71 |
| PL | $4.9B | — | — | 15.9× | 25.9% | 56.1% | -80.2% | -131% | -131% | — | 71 |
| ONDS | $3.7B | — | — | 72.5× | 605% | 39.7% | -261% | -30.2% | -30.2% | — | 98 |
| VISN | $1.5B | 0.7× | 118.5× | 0.8× | 39.7% | 49.5% | — | -227% | 36.5% | — | 48 |
| HLIT | $1.1B | — | 43.9× | 3.1× | -26.2% | 48.5% | -12.0% | -11.3% | -8.7% | -0.5× | 48 |
| UMAC | $776M | — | — | 69.3× | 101% | 34.9% | -171% | -11.0% | -11.0% | — | 36 |
| GILT | $599M | 22.9× | 9.2× | 1.3× | 47.9% | 29.5% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 4.1% | -3.5× | 17 |
| AVNW | $259M | 106.2× | 12.6× | 0.6× | 1.2% | 31.5% | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 1.1× | 19 |
| BKTI | $257M | 19.8× | 13.2× | 3.0× | 12.5% | 48.8% | 15.7% | 30.3% | 30.3% | -1.3× | 12 |
| CRNT | $188M | — | 9.3× | 0.6× | -14.1% | 33.8% | -0.6% | -1.2% | -1.1% | -1.1× | 11 |
| VUZI | $179M | — | — | 28.5× | 9.1% | -16.9% | -514% | -131% | -131% | — | 14 |
| GTLL | $1M | — | — | 1.4× | 117% | 100% | -32.8% | 29.7% | 29.7% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing GTLL's sector (Radio & Tv Broadcasting & Communications Equipment) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $117K FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2020 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
The same 1 year as the 3-yr average, with the stock compensation of those years charged as a cost. Shares issued to employees are real dilution, so this asks what the business generates for existing holders.
On the SBC-adjusted basis free cash flow is -$8K — there is nothing left to discount once stock compensation is charged, so no growth rate can be solved for. The 3-yr avg basis gives $117K over those same years — the whole difference is the stock compensation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M 100.0% | $481K 100.0% | $17K 100.0% | $125K 100.0% | $15K 100.0% | $548K 100.0% | — |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.1M 200.2% | $577K 119.9% | — | $13K 10.4% | — | $71K 12.9% | — |
| Gross Profit | $1.0M 100.0% | $481K 100.0% | $17K 100.0% | $112K 89.6% | $15K 100.0% | $478K 87.1% | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $132K 12.6% | $142K 29.6% | $34K 197.6% | $147K 118.4% | $173K 1155.3% | $51K 9.3% | $2K |
| Total Operating Expenses | $874K 83.6% | $693K 144.1% | $540K 3177.7% | $611K 490.6% | $367K 2445.4% | $710K 129.4% | $208K |
| Operating Income | $171K 16.4% | -$212K -44.1% | -$523K -3077.7% | -$499K -401.0% | -$352K -2345.4% | -$232K -42.4% | -$208K |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | $60K 11.0% | $14K |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | $8K 6.0% | — | $2K 0.3% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$514K -49.2% | $477K 99.2% | -$511K -3004.9% | -$779K -625.7% | -$3.9M -25845.7% | -$319K -58.1% | -$562K |
| Pretax Income | -$343K -32.8% | $265K 55.2% | -$1.0M -6082.6% | -$1.3M -1026.7% | -$4.2M -28191.1% | -$551K -100.5% | -$770K |
| Net Income | -$343K -32.8% | $265K 55.2% | -$1.0M -6082.6% | -$1.3M -1026.7% | -$4.2M -28191.1% | -$551K -100.5% | -$770K |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 14.69B | 14.68B | 14.43B | 12.34B | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 30% against ROIC 30% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | 12.9 | — | 10.4 | — | 119.9 | 200.2 |
| Gross Profit | — | 87.1 | 100.0 | 89.6 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| SG&A | — | 9.3 | 1155.3 | 118.4 | 197.6 | 29.6 | 12.6 |
| Operating Income | — | -42.4 | -2345.4 | -401.0 | -3077.7 | -44.1 | 16.4 |
| Net Income | — | -100.5 | -28191.1 | -1026.7 | -6082.6 | 55.2 | -32.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GTLL: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 87.1% | -42.4% | -100.5% |
| FY2021 | 100.0% | -2345.4% | -28191.1% |
| FY2022 | 89.6% | -401.0% | -1026.7% |
| FY2023 | 100.0% | -3077.7% | -6082.6% |
| FY2024 | 100.0% | -44.1% | 55.2% |
| FY2025 | 100.0% | 16.4% | -32.8% |
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
No debt, so there is no leverage path to distress.
Balance sheet at 2025-06-30. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
Once stock compensation is charged, free cash flow averages -$8,177 over the last 1 year — there is nothing left to discount, so no growth rate can be solved for. Before the charge it averages $116,823.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. No TTM point: the four most recent quarters do not form a usable window.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive_free_cash_flow.