Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 385 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $26.20 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 6.3%/yr for a decade (off $347M normalized FCF).
The market's 6.3% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.19B shares · net debt $1.2B
mean -46.4% · volatility σ 69% · implied rate exceeded in 2/6 yrs
Central path = implied 6.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (69%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 15% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $52M dividends + $208M buybacks = $260M returned on $341M FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · -40%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 50%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $177M covers the $7M due within a year 25.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~9.6% on $1.6B of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $177M fully covers short-term debt of $7M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.0 | 78.7 | 82.2 | 80.5 | 81.0 | 80.5 | 79.7 | 79.6 |
| Gross Profit | 23.0 | 21.3 | 17.8 | 19.5 | 19.0 | 19.5 | 20.3 | 20.4 |
| SG&A | 7.4 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Income Tax | -24.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| Net Income | 35.7 | 9.6 | 2.6 | 13.6 | 10.8 | 6.7 | 8.1 | 8.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GTX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.58B 100.0% | $3.48B 100.0% | $3.89B 100.0% | $3.60B 100.0% | $3.63B 100.0% | $3.03B 100.0% | $3.25B 100.0% | $3.38B 100.0% | $3.10B 100.0% | $3.00B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.85B 79.6% | $2.77B 79.7% | $3.13B 80.5% | $2.92B 81.0% | $2.93B 80.5% | $2.50B 82.2% | $2.56B 78.7% | $2.60B 77.0% | $2.36B 76.3% | $2.37B 78.9% |
| Gross Profit | $731.0M 20.4% | $705.0M 20.3% | $756.0M 19.5% | $683.0M 19.0% | $707.0M 19.5% | $539.0M 17.8% | $693.0M 21.3% | $776.0M 23.0% | $735.0M 23.7% | $632.0M 21.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $240.0M 6.7% | $240.0M 6.9% | $247.0M 6.4% | $216.0M 6.0% | $216.0M 5.9% | $260.0M 8.6% | $231.0M 7.1% | $249.0M 7.4% | $249.0M 8.0% | $197.0M 6.6% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $159.0M 4.1% | $8.0M 0.2% | $83.0M 2.3% | $79.0M 2.6% | $68.0M 2.1% | $19.0M 0.6% | $8.0M 0.3% | $7.0M 0.2% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $4.0M 0.1% | $3.0M 0.1% | $7.0M 0.2% | $2.0M 0.1% | $1.0M 0.0% | $3.0M 0.1% | $7.0M 0.2% | $7.0M 0.2% | $14.0M 0.5% | $16.0M 0.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $19.0M 0.5% | $13.0M 0.4% | $2.0M 0.1% | $47.0M 1.3% | $6.0M 0.2% | $38.0M 1.3% | -$8.0M -0.2% | $8.0M 0.2% | $18.0M 0.6% | $5.0M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $392.0M 10.9% | $343.0M 9.9% | $347.0M 8.9% | $496.0M 13.8% | $538.0M 14.8% | $119.0M 3.9% | $346.0M 10.7% | $396.0M 11.7% | $366.0M 11.8% | $250.0M 8.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $82.0M 2.3% | $61.0M 1.8% | $86.0M 2.2% | $106.0M 2.9% | $43.0M 1.2% | $39.0M 1.3% | $33.0M 1.0% | -$810.0M -24.0% | $1.35B 43.6% | $51.0M 1.7% |
| Net Income | $310.0M 8.6% | $282.0M 8.1% | $261.0M 6.7% | $390.0M 10.8% | $495.0M 13.6% | $80.0M 2.6% | $313.0M 9.6% | $1.21B 35.7% | -$983.0M -31.8% | $199.0M 6.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.55 | $1.27 | $-0.31 | $0.75 | $1.69 | $1.06 | $4.20 | $16.28 | $-13.27 | $2.69 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.52 | $1.26 | $-0.31 | $0.75 | $1.56 | $1.05 | $4.12 | $16.21 | $-13.27 | $2.69 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 199.8M | 222.3M | 166.6M | 64.7M | 69.7M | 75.5M | 74.6M | 74.1M | 74.1M | 74.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 203.6M | 224.1M | 166.6M | 65.1M | 317.5M | 76.1M | 75.9M | 74.4M | 74.1M | 74.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.73T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.35T | 332.4× | 142.6× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $625.8B | 61.2× | 25.2× | 2.7× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $452.0B | 33.6× | 32.6× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $309.6B | 21.9× | 14.7× | 1.9× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $203.0B | 136.5× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $139.5B | 25.9× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.4B | 187.5× | 114.1× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $112.6B | 60.8× | 27.3× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $111.2B | 16.7× | 12.2× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $104.6B | — | 39.1× | 8.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $96.3B | 48.2× | — | 3.3× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $90.5B | 35.8× | 21.0× | 3.5× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $89.4B | 174.3× | 94.2× | 12.7× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.8B | 26.6× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.1B | 34.8× | 22.1× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $73.4B | 29.4× | 19.9× | 4.1× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $71.6B | 50.8× | 24.6× | 6.0× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $69.2B | 16.4× | — | 3.9× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $66.6B | 43.1× | 26.5× | 2.9× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $55.1B | — | 4.7× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $55.0B | 17.6× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $49.8B | 20.5× | 13.8× | 2.6× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $49.5B | 32.5× | 21.4× | 4.2× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| EBAY | $48.9B | 25.1× | 17.7× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| GTX | $5.0B | 17.2× | — | 1.4× | 3.1% | 20.4% | 8.6% | -38.7% | 50.3% | — | 385 |
Peers = companies sharing GTX's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.