Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +2.04% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $3.04 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -60.0%/yr for a decade (off $14M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.00B shares · net debt -$10M
mean -47.5% · volatility σ 82% · implied rate exceeded in 2/3 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (82%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 6 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 259 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $230.5B | 33.6× | 20.6× | 6.8× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| BHPLF | $220.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| SCCO | $162.8B | 37.6× | 21.0× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.3% | 39.3% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| TX | $107.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $99.7B | — | 12.0× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 1.0× | 1,775 |
| SHW | $91.6B | 36.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| AEM | $82.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| ECL | $80.5B | 39.2× | 23.7× | 5.0× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $68.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| CRH | $66.9B | 18.1× | 10.4× | 1.8× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| APD | $65.7B | — | 92.9× | 5.5× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $63.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| SYAXF | $63.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DD | $61.5B | — | — | 9.0× | 1.9% | 34.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 1,172 |
| WPM | $55.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| AU | $44.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| STLD | $38.5B | 33.3× | 20.7× | 2.1× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| VMC | $37.5B | 35.4× | 17.6× | 4.7× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $33.4B | 29.5× | 18.6× | 5.4× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| TCKRF | $32.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 |
| NTR | $32.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| AMRZ | $29.2B | 24.7× | 12.1× | 2.5× | 0.9% | 25.7% | 10.0% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 1.9× | 433 |
| GFIOF | $28.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| PPG | $26.6B | 17.2× | — | 1.7× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.8% | — | 1,003 |
| GURE | $3M | — | — | 0.4× | -74.5% | — | -782% | -41.9% | -41.9% | — | 6 |
Peers = companies sharing GURE's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2024
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 | FY2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.7M 100.0% | $30.0M 100.0% | $66.1M 100.0% | $55.0M 100.0% | $28.2M 100.0% | $10.6M 100.0% | $2.6M 100.0% | $107.5M 100.0% | $149.3M 100.0% | $162.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | $19.4M 68.8% | $5.4M 51.2% | $1.3M 50.5% | $63.2M 58.7% | $94.8M 63.5% | $109.0M 67.2% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $195K 0.2% | $262K 0.2% | $231K 0.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.2M 81.4% | $4.2M 14.1% | $6.0M 9.1% | $9.5M 17.3% | $10.2M 36.3% | $13.3M 125.3% | $66K 2.5% | $279K 0.3% | $343K 0.2% | $375K 0.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $29.9M 390.4% | $41.9M 139.6% | $49.6M 75.1% | $49.8M 90.5% | $37.9M 134.3% | $33.9M 319.8% | $86.1M 3319.8% | $96.4M 89.6% | $101.6M 68.0% | $117.2M 72.2% |
| Operating Income | -$22.2M -290.4% | -$11.9M -39.6% | $16.5M 24.9% | $5.2M 9.5% | -$9.7M -34.3% | -$23.3M -219.8% | -$83.6M -3219.8% | $11.2M 10.4% | $47.7M 32.0% | $45.2M 27.8% |
| Interest Expense | $92K 1.2% | $105K 0.4% | $121K 0.2% | $137K 0.2% | $136K 0.5% | $145K 1.4% | $160K 6.2% | $164K 0.2% | $175K 0.1% | $194K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $80K 1.0% | $250K 0.8% | $286K 0.4% | $295K 0.5% | $291K 1.0% | $447K 4.2% | $661K 25.5% | $556K 0.5% | $488K 0.3% | $469K 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$62K -0.8% | $145K 0.5% | $165K 0.2% | $163K 0.3% | $155K 0.5% | $301K 2.8% | $501K 19.3% | $392K 0.4% | $313K 0.2% | $275K 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$58.3M -760.4% | -$58.3M -193.9% | $16.6M 25.2% | $5.4M 9.8% | -$9.5M -33.8% | -$23.0M -217.0% | -$83.1M -3200.5% | $11.6M 10.8% | $48.0M 32.2% | $45.4M 28.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $1.6M 21.5% | $3.5M 11.8% | $6.6M 10.0% | $6.3M 11.4% | -$1.1M -3.9% | $2.8M 26.5% | -$13.1M -504.4% | $3.6M 3.4% | $11.8M 7.9% | $11.4M 7.0% |
| Net Income | -$59.9M -781.9% | -$61.8M -205.7% | $10.1M 15.2% | -$925K -1.7% | -$8.4M -29.9% | -$25.8M -243.5% | -$70.0M -2696.2% | $8.0M 7.4% | $36.2M 24.3% | $34.1M 21.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-54.88 | $-58.16 | $1.00 | $-0.09 | — | — | $-1.49 | $0.17 | $0.78 | $0.75 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-54.88 | $-58.16 | — | — | — | — | $-1.49 | $0.17 | $0.78 | $0.74 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 1.1M | 1.1M | 10.0M | 10.5M | — | — | 46.8M | 46.8M | 46.3M | 45.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 1.1M | 1.1M | — | — | — | — | 46.8M | 46.8M | 46.6M | 46.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$28M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -42%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2024 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 58.7 | 50.5 | 51.2 | 68.8 | — | — | — | — |
| R&D | 0.2 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 0.3 | 2.5 | 125.3 | 36.3 | 17.3 | 9.1 | 14.1 | 81.4 |
| Operating Income | 10.4 | -3219.8 | -219.8 | -34.3 | 9.5 | 24.9 | -39.6 | -290.4 |
| Income Tax | 3.4 | -504.4 | 26.5 | -3.9 | 11.4 | 10.0 | 11.8 | 21.5 |
| Net Income | 7.4 | -2696.2 | -243.5 | -29.9 | -1.7 | 15.2 | -205.7 | -781.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GURE: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.