Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 38 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVS | $115.5B | 65.0× | 11.6× | 0.3× | 7.8% | 45.0% | 0.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | -0.9× | 656 |
| JD | $34.6B | 27.9× | 9.0× | 0.2× | 17.9% | 16.0% | 1.8% | 10.3% | 9.9% | -10.3× | 77 |
| ULTA | $27.9B | 25.3× | 15.0× | 2.3× | 9.7% | 39.1% | 9.3% | 41.1% | 40.3% | -0.2× | 291 |
| CPNG | $26.2B | 132.4× | 21.7× | 0.8× | 14.1% | 29.4% | 0.6% | 4.5% | 3.3% | -4.8× | 108 |
| CDW | $20.7B | 20.4× | 13.2× | 0.9× | 6.8% | 21.7% | 4.8% | 40.9% | 13.0% | 2.6× | 201 |
| W | $16.5B | — | 56.7× | 1.3× | 5.1% | 30.2% | -2.5% | 11.3% | -63.9% | 5.6× | 91 |
| DKS | $14.0B | 14.2× | 8.0× | 0.8× | 28.1% | 32.9% | 4.9% | 15.3% | 15.3% | -0.9× | 199 |
| CHWY | $8.4B | 40.1× | 19.6× | 0.7× | 6.2% | 29.8% | 1.8% | 44.7% | 44.7% | -2.2× | 130 |
| FCFS | $8.1B | 25.3× | — | 2.2× | 8.0% | 50.3% | 9.0% | 14.5% | 7.4% | — | 110 |
| VIPS | $6.1B | 1.3× | 2.6× | 0.4× | 2.0% | 23.1% | 6.8% | 17.7% | 15.5% | -1.8× | 45 |
| NSIT | $5.2B | 36.7× | 11.1× | 0.6× | -5.2% | 21.4% | 1.9% | 9.5% | 9.5% | -0.8× | 66 |
| BBWI | $4.6B | 7.3× | 5.5× | 0.6× | -0.2% | 43.7% | 8.9% | -50.7% | 24.9% | 2.1× | 91 |
| SIG | $4.6B | 16.8× | 6.8× | 0.7× | 1.6% | 39.5% | 4.3% | 15.0% | 15.0% | -1.6× | 65 |
| ASO | $3.7B | 10.9× | 6.1× | 0.6× | 2.0% | 34.8% | 6.2% | 17.4% | 14.2% | 0.2× | 73 |
| PTRN | $3.0B | — | 64.1× | 1.2× | 39.3% | 43.6% | 0.6% | 2.8% | 2.8% | -6.8× | 13 |
| GRDN | $2.6B | — | 26.3× | 1.8× | 17.9% | 20.2% | 3.4% | 22.6% | 22.6% | -0.7× | 19 |
| GCT | $2.2B | 16.9× | 11.6× | 1.7× | 11.1% | 23.3% | 10.6% | 28.3% | 28.3% | -2.5× | 41 |
| EZPW | $1.8B | 20.5× | 10.1× | 1.4× | 9.7% | 58.5% | 8.6% | 10.7% | 7.1% | 0.3× | 63 |
| SBH | $1.7B | 9.7× | 5.7× | 0.5× | -0.4% | 51.6% | 5.3% | 24.7% | 11.7% | 1.7× | 51 |
| RVLV | $1.6B | 26.9× | 17.1× | 1.3× | 8.5% | 53.5% | 5.0% | 12.0% | 12.0% | -3.7× | 31 |
| SVV | $1.4B | 67.6× | 10.2× | 0.9× | 9.2% | — | 1.3% | 5.2% | 2.0% | 3.1× | 24 |
| REAL | $1.4B | — | 135.6× | 2.0× | 15.4% | 74.6% | -6.0% | 10.1% | 10.1% | -16.7× | 31 |
| SPH | $1.2B | 11.0× | 8.6× | 0.8× | 7.9% | 60.6% | 7.4% | — | — | 4.3× | 31 |
| WINA | $1.0B | 25.4× | 18.3× | 11.9× | 5.9% | 96.4% | 48.4% | -77.6% | -77.6% | -0.2× | 37 |
| WOOF | $742M | 86.3× | 6.2× | 0.1× | -2.5% | 38.7% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 3.9× | 29 |
| HERE | $83M | 5.1× | — | 0.2× | -27.1% | 81.5% | 13.2% | 44.3% | 43.7% | -2.0× | 1 |
Peers = companies sharing HERE's sector (Retail-Hobby, Toy & Game Shops) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 2 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 43% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $10.9M dividends + $20K buybacks = $10.9M returned on $25.2M FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 3 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 44%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 3 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $380.5M 100.0% | $3.80B 100.0% | $3.08B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $70.3M 18.5% | $550.3M 14.5% | $391.5M 12.7% |
| Gross Profit | $310.2M 81.5% | $3.25B 85.5% | $2.69B 87.3% |
| Research & Development | $13.8M 3.6% | $144.9M 3.8% | $219.8M 7.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $16.1M 4.2% | $125.8M 3.3% | $175.2M 5.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $254.8M 67.0% | $2.87B 75.6% | $2.80B 91.0% |
| Operating Income | $55.4M 14.6% | $377.4M 9.9% | -$113.6M -3.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $698K 0.2% | $10.5M 0.3% | $5.3M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $59.5M 15.6% | $29.0M 0.8% | $21.3M 0.7% |
| Pretax Income | $65.5M 17.2% | $416.9M 11.0% | -$87.0M -2.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $15.8M 4.1% | $31.3M 0.8% | $21.7M 0.7% |
| Net Income | $50.1M 13.2% | $385.5M 10.2% | -$108.5M -3.5% |
| Per Share | |||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.31 | $2.34 | -$1.26 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.30 | $2.27 | -$1.26 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 161.3M | 165.0M | 103.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 165.2M | 170.0M | 103.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
Average free cash flow across the last 3 positive fiscal years (FY2023, FY2024, FY2025). Smooths the cycle. Stock compensation is NOT charged — it is added back inside operating cash flow.
A reverse DCF cannot be solved for HERE: its net cash ($114.3M) exceeds its market value, so enterprise value is negative. Discounting a positive cash-flow stream always gives a positive number, so no growth rate reaches that target. This is common for banks, brokers and payment companies, where customer balances sit in the cash line and are not the company's to spend.
On the basis ($20.7M) the requirement is off the scale. Shares issued to employees are added back in operating cash flow, so this basis treats them as free.
Default is 10.8% — this company's computed cost of capital, the same rate the Analysis tab discounts at.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares (market data) · net debt -$114.3M
Today's price is outside this grid at every discount rate shown — the assumptions it requires lie beyond the plotted range, which is itself the finding.
mean -6.6% · volatility σ 39% · implied rate exceeded in 2/2 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (39%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $115.9M fully covers short-term debt of $1.6M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
Where each multiple sits in its own 3-yr range · 16th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 3-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 44% against ROIC 44% — 1% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is 54.4% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 12.7 | 14.5 | 18.5 |
| Gross Profit | 87.3 | 85.5 | 81.5 |
| R&D | 7.1 | 3.8 | 3.6 |
| SG&A | 5.7 | 3.3 | 4.2 |
| Operating Income | -3.7 | 9.9 | 14.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.7 | 0.8 | 4.1 |
| Net Income | -3.5 | 10.2 | 13.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on HERE: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Earns 481.6pts above its cost of capital, but margins are compressing.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | 87.3% | -3.7% | -3.5% |
| FY2024 | 85.5% | 9.9% | 10.2% |
| FY2025 | 81.5% | 14.6% | 13.2% |
Return on equity (44%) and return on invested capital (44%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
Margins have compressed 2 years running even as the spread stayed positive.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Debt is present but there is no positive EBITDA or no reported interest expense, so coverage cannot be measured.
Balance sheet at 2025-06-30. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: interest_expense.
No growth rate within the range this model can express reaches the current price, so the requirement cannot be stated as a number.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. No TTM point: the four most recent quarters do not form a usable window.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: implied_growth.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.